Commercial production of aprotinin in transgenic maize seeds

Abstract

The development of genetic transformation technology for plants has stimulated an interest in using transgenic plants as a novel manufacturing system for producing different classes of proteins of industrial and pharmaceutical value. In this regard, we report the generation and characterization of transgenic maize lines producing recombinant aprotinin. The transgenic aprotinin lines recovered were transformed with the aprotinin gene using the bar gene as a selectable marker. The bar and aprotinin genes were introduced into immature maize embryos via particle bombardment. Aprotinin gene expression was driven by the maize ubiquitin promoter and protein accumulation was targeted to the extracellular matrix. One line that showed a high level of aprotinin expression was characterized in detail. The protein accumulates primarily in the embryo of the seed. Southern blot analysis showed that the line had at least 20 copies of the bar and aprotinin genes. Further genetic analysis revealed that numerous plants derived from this transgenic line had a large range of levels of expression of the aprotinin gene (0–0.069%) of water-soluble protein in T2 seeds. One plant lineage that showed stable expression after 4 selfing generations was recovered from the parental transgenic line. This line showed an accumulation of the protein in seeds that was comparable to the best T2 lines, and the recombinant aprotinin could be effectively recovered and purified from seeds. Biochemical analysis of the purified aprotinin from seeds revealed that the recombinant aprotinin had the same molecular weight, N-terminal amino acid sequence, isoelectric point, and trypsin inhibition activity as native aprotinin. The demonstration that the recombinant aprotinin protein purified from transgenic maize seeds has biochemical and functional properties identical to its native counterpart provides a proof-of-concept example for producing new generation products for the pharmaceutical industry.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. 1.

    An G, Mitra A, Choi HK, Costa MA, An K, Thomburg RW, Ryan CA: Functional analysis of the 30 control region of the potato wound-inducible proteinase inhibitor II gene. Plant Cell 1: 115–122 (1989).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Anderson S, Kingston IB: Isolation of a genomic clone for bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor by using a unique sequence synthetic DNA probe. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 80: 6838–6842 (1983).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Armstrong CL, Green CE, Phillips RL: Development and availability of germplasm with high Type II culture formation response. Maize Genet Coop Newsl. 65: 92–93 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Austin S, Bingham ET, Koegel RG, Mathews DE, Shahan NW, Straub RJ, Burgess RR: An overview of a feasibility study for the production of industrial enzymes in transgenic alfalfa. Ann NY Acad Sci 721: 234–244 (1994).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Balabushevitch NG, Kildeyeva NR, Moroz NA, Trusova SP, Vimik AD, Khromov GL, Larionova NL: Regulating aspects of biosoluble and insoluble film release systems containing protein proteinase inhibitor. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 61: 129–138 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Benfey PN, Chua N-H: Regulated genes in transgenic plants. Science 244: 174–181 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Bradford M: A rapid and sensitive method for the quantification of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72: 248–254 (1976).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Davies MJ, Allen A, Kort H, Weerasena NA, Rocco D, Paul CL, Hunt BJ, Elliott MJ: Prospective, randomized, doubleblind study of high-dose aprotinin in pediatric cardiac operations. Ann Thoracic Surg 63: 497–503 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Finnegan J, McElroy D: Transgene inactivation: plants fight back! Bio/technology 12: 883–888 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Fisk HJ, Dandekar AM: The introduction and expression of transgenes in plants. Scient Hort 55: 5–36 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Flavell RB: Inactivation of gene expression in plants as a consequence of novel sequence duplications. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91: 3490–3496 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Franken E, Teuschel U, Hain R: Recombinant proteins from transgenic plants. Curr Opin Biotechonol 8: 411–416 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Gallie DR, Sleat DE, Watts JW, Turner PC, Wilson TMA: The 50-leader sequence of tobacco mosaic virus RNA enhances the expression of foreign gene transcripts in vitro and in vivo. Nucl Acids Res 15: 3257–3273 (1987).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Hood EE, Witcher D, Maddock S, Meyer T, Baszczynski C, Bailey M, Flynn P, Register J, Marshall L. Bond D, Kulisek E, Kusnadi A, Kusnadi A, Evangelista R, Nikolov Z, Wooge C, Mehigh R, Hennan R, Heman R, Kappel W, Ritland D, Li C-P, Howard J: Commercial production of avidin from transgenic maize: characterization of transformant, production, processing, extracting and purification. Mol Breed 3: 291–306 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Iglesias VA, Moscone EA, Papp I, Neuhuber F, Michalowski S, Phelan T, Spiker S, Matzke M, Matzke AJM: Molecu-lar and cytogenctic analysis of stable and unstably expressed transgene loci in tobacco. Plant Cell 9: 1251–1264 (1997).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Jefferey M, Goodbrand JM, Goodsir CM: Pathology of the transmissible spongiform encephalopathies with special emphasis on ultrastructure. Micron 26: 277–298 (1995).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Krebbers E, Bosch D, Vandekekerckhove J: Prospects and progress in the production of foreign proteins and peptides in plants. In: Shewry PR, Gutteridge S (eds) Plant Protein Engineering, pp. 315–325. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Laskowski M, Kato I: Protein inhibitors of proteinases. Ann Rev Biochem 49: 593--626 (1980).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Matzke MA, Matzke AJM: How and why do plants inactivate homologous (trans)genes? Plant Physiol 107: 679–685 (1995).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Meyer P: Repeat-induced gene silencing: common mechanisms in plants and fungi. Biol Chem Hoppe-Seyler 377: 87–95 (1996).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Miele L: Plants as bioreactors for biopharmaceuticals: regulatory considerations. Trends Biotechnol 15: 45–50 (1997).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Nagy F, Odell JT, Morelli, G, Chua NH: Properties of expression of the 35S promoter from CAMV in transgenic tobacco plants. In: Zaitlin M, Day P, Hollaender A (eds) Biotechnology in Plant Science: Relevance to Agriculture in the Eighties, pp. 227–235. Academic Press, Orlando, FL (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Pen J, Sijmons PC, van Ooijen AJJ, Hockema A: Protein production in transgenic crops: analysis of plant molecular farming. In: Industrial Crops Production, pp. 241–250. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Register JC, Peterson DJ, Bell PJ, Bullock WP, Evans IJ, Frame B, Greenland AJ, Higgs NS, Jepson I, Jiao S: Structure and function of selectable and nonselectable transgenes in maize after introduction by particle bombardment. Plant Mol Biol 25: 951–961 (1994).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Rogers JC: Two barley _-amylase gene families are regulated differently in aleurone cells. J Biol Chem 260: 3731–3738 (1985).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T: Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Schaegger and von Jagow: Tricine- sodium dodecyl sulfate- polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis for the separation of proteins in the range from 1 to 100 kDa. Anal Biochem 166: 368–379 (1987).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Smith C, Collings J: Molecular pathology of prion disease. Essays Biochem 29: 157–174 (1995).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Stam M, Mol JNM, Kooter JM: The silencing of genes in transgenic plants. Ann Bot 79: 3–12 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Tomes DT, Ross MC, Songstad DD: Direct DNA transfer into intact plant cells via microprojectile bombardment. In: Gamborg OL, Phillips GC (eds) Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture: Fundamental Methods, pp. 197–213. Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    White J, Chang S-YP, Bibb MJ, Bibb MJ: A cassette containing the bar gene of Streptomyces hygroscopicus: a selectable marker for plant transformation. Nucl Acids Res 18: 1062 (1990).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Whitelam GC, Cockbum W: Antibody expression in transgenic plants. Trends Plant Sci 1: 268–272 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Whitelam GC, Cockbum B, Gandecha AR, Owen MRL: Heterologous protein production in transgenic plants. Biotechnol Genet Engng Rev 11: 1–29 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Witcher DR, DeWaard M, Liu H, Pragnell M, Campbell KP: Association of native Ca2 +C channel β subunits with the α 1 subunit interaction domain. J Biol Chem 270: 18088–18093 (1995).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Witcher DR, Hood EE, Peterson D, Bailey M, Marshall L, Bond D, Ritland D, Kusnadi A, Evangelista R, Nikolov Z, Wooge C, Mehigh R, Kappel B, Register J, Howard J: Commercial production of β-glucuronidase (GUS): amodel system for the production of proteins in plants. Mol Breed 4: 301–312 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John A. Howard.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhong, GY., Peterson, D., Delaney, D.E. et al. Commercial production of aprotinin in transgenic maize seeds. Molecular Breeding 5, 345–356 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009677809492

Download citation

  • aprotinin
  • heterologous protein
  • transgenic maize
  • pharmaceutical protein
  • transgene genetics
  • transgene stability