Skip to main content
Log in

Genetic analysis of post-flowering drought tolerance and components of grain development in Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench

  • Published:
Molecular Breeding Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Drought is a serious agronomic problem and the single greatest factor contributing to crop yield loss in the world today. This problem may be alleviated by developing crops that are well adapted to dry-land environments. Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) is one of the most drought-tolerant grain crops and is an excellent crop model for evaluating mechanisms of drought tolerance. In this study, a set of 98 recombinant inbred (RI) sorghum lines was developed from a cross between two genotypes with contrasting drought reactions, TX7078 (pre-flowering-tolerant, post-flowering susceptible) and B35 (pre-flowering susceptible, post-flowering-tolerant). The RI population was characterized under drought and non-drought conditions for the inheritance of traits associated with post-flowering drought tolerance and for potentially related components of grain development. Quantitative trait loci (QTL) analysis identified 13 regions of the genome associated with one or more measures of post-flowering drought tolerance. Two QTL were identified with major effects on yield and 'staygreen’ under post-flowering drought. These loci were also associated with yield under fully irrigated conditions suggesting that these tolerance loci have pleiotropic effects on yield under non-drought conditions. Loci associated with rate and/or duration of grain development were also identified. QTL analysis indicated many loci that were associated with both rate and duration of grain development. High rate and short duration of grain development were generally associated with larger seed size, but only two of these loci were associated with differences in stability of performance under drought.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bernatzky R, Tanksley SD: Towards a saturated linkage map in tomato based on isozymes and random cDNA sequences. Genetics 112: 887–898 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Doggett H: Sorghum, 2nd ed. Longman Scientific and Technical, London (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Duncan RR, Bockholt AJ, Miller FR: Descriptive comparison of senescent and non-senescent sorghum genotypes. Agron J 73: 849–853 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Duncan RR: The association of plant senescence with root and stalk diseases in sorghum. In: Mughogho LK, Rosenberg G (eds) Sorghum Root and Stalk Rots: A Critical Review. Proceedings of the Consultative Group Discussion on Research Needs and Strategies for Control of Sorghum Root and Stalk Rot Diseases, 27 Nov.–2 Dec. 1983, Bellagio, Italy, pp. 99–110. ICRISAT, Patancheru, India (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jordan WR, Monk RL: Enhancement of drought resistance of sorghum: progress and limitations. In: Proceedings of the 35th Annual Corn and Sorghum Research conference, pp. 185–204. American Seed Trade Association, Washington, DC (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jordan WR, Clark RB, Seetharama N: The role of edaphic factors in disease development. In: Mughogho LK, Rosenberg G (eds) Sorghum Root and Stalk Rots: A Critical Review. Proceedings of the Consultative Group Discussion on Research Needs and Strategies for Control of Sorghum Root and Stalk Rot Diseases, 27 Nov.–2 Dec. 1983, Bellagio, Italy, pp. 81–97. ICRISAT, Patancheru, India (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lander E, Green P, Abrahamson J, Barlow A, Daley M, Lincoln S, Newburg L: MAPMAKER: an interactive computer package for constructing primary genetic linkage maps of experimental and natural populations. Genomics 1: 174–181 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ludlow MM, Muchow RC: A critical evaluation of traits for improving crop yields in water-limited environments. Adv Agron 43: 107–153 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mughogho LK, Pande S: Charcoal rot of Sorghum. In: Mughogho LK, Rosenberg G (eds) Sorghum Root and Stalk Rots: A Critical Review. Proceedings of the Consultative Group Discussion on Research Needs and Strategies for Control of Sorghum Root and Stalk Rot Diseases, 27 Nov.–2 Dec. 1983, Bellagio, Italy, pp. 99–110. ICRISAT, Patancheru, India (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rosenow DT: Breeding for resistance to root and stalk rots in Texas. In Mughogho LK, Rosenberg G (eds) Sorghum Root and Stalk Rots: A Critical Review. Proceedings of the Consultative Group Discussion on Research Needs and Strategies for Control of Sorghum Root and Stalk Rot Diseases, 27 Nov.–2 Dec. 1983, Bellagio, Italy, pp. 99–110. ICRISAT, Patancheru, India (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rosenow DT, Clark LE: Drought tolerance in sorghum. In: Proceedings of the 36th Annual Corn and Sorghum Research Conference, pp. 18–30. American Seed Trade Association, Washington, DC (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rosielle AA, Hamblin J: Theoretical aspects of selection for yield in stress and non-stress environments. Crop Sci 21: 943–946 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Saghai-Maroof MA, Soliman KM, Jorgensen RA, Allard RW: Ribosomal DNA spacer-length polymorphisms in barley: Mendelian inheritance, chromosomal location, and population dynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 81: 8014–8018 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sayed HI, Gadallah AM: Variation in dry matter and grain filling characteristics in wheat cultivars. Field Crops Res 7: 61–71 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tenkouano A, Miller FR, Fredriksen RA, Rosenow DT: Genetics of non-senescence and charcoal rot resistance in sorghum. Theor Appl Genet 85: 644–648 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tuinstra MR, Grote E, Goldsbrough PB, Ejeta G: Identification of quantitative trait loci associated with pre-flowering drought tolerance in sorghum. Crop Sci 36: 1337–1344 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Turner NC: Drought resistance and adaptation to water deficits in crop plants. In: Mussell H, Staples RC (eds) Stress Physiology in Crop Plants, pp. 343–372. Wiley-Interscience, New York (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wanous MK, Miller FR, Rosenow DT: Evaluation of visual rating scales for green leaf retention in sorghum. Crop Sci 31: 1691–1694 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Welsh J, McClelland M: Fingerprinting genomes using PCR with arbitrary primers. Nucl Acids Res 18: 7213–7218 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Williams JGK, Hanafey MK, Rafalski JA, Tingey SV: Genetic analysis using random amplified polymorphic DNA markers. Meth Enzymol 218: 704–740 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wittwer CT, Garling DJ: Rapid cycle DNA amplification: Time and temperature optimization. BioTechniques 10: 76–83 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tuinstra, M.R., Grote, E.M., Goldsbrough, P.B. et al. Genetic analysis of post-flowering drought tolerance and components of grain development in Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench. Molecular Breeding 3, 439–448 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009673126345

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009673126345

Navigation