Skip to main content
Log in

Self-Organized Criticality: Self-Organized Complexity? The Disorder and "Simple Complexities" of Power Law Distributions

  • Published:
Open Systems & Information Dynamics

Abstract

Simple measures of complexity, showing either a monotonic or a convex dependence on disorder, are studied for rank ordered power law distributions, indicative of criticality, in the case where the total number of ranks is large. It is found that a pwoer law distribution may produce a high level of complexity only for a restricted range of system size (as measured by the total number of ranks), with the range depending on the exponent of the distribution. Self-organized criticality thus does not guarantee a high level of complexity, and when complexity does arise, it is self-organized itself only if self-organized criticality is reached at an appropriate system size.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliography

  1. P. Bak, C. Tank, and K. Wiesenfeld, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 381 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  2. P. Bak, How Nature Works: the Science of Self-organized Criticality, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  3. N. Gutenberg and C. F. Richter, Seismicity of the Earth, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. C. Johnston and S. Nava, J. Geophys. Res. 90, 6737 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  5. B. Mandelbrot, J. Bus. (Chicago) 36, 307 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  6. B. Mandelbrot, J. Bus. (Chicago) 37, 393 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  7. D. M. Raup and J. J. Sepkoski, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (USA) 81, 801 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  8. D. M. Raup, Science 231, 1528 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. E. J. Newman, Proc. R. Soc. London B 263, 1605 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  10. G.K. Zipf, Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort, Addison-Wesley, Cambridge, 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  11. S. Glassman, Comp. Networks ISDN Systems 27, 165 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  12. B. A. Huberman and L. A. Adamic, Nature 401, 131 (1999); see also http://www.parc.xerox.com/istl/groups/iea/www/growth.html.

    Google Scholar 

  13. R. Wackerbauer, A. Witt, H. Atmanspacher, J. Kurths and H. Scheingraber, Chaos, Solitons Fractals 4, 133 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  14. H. Atmanspacher, J. Consciousness Studies 1, 168 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  15. H. Atmanspacher, C. Räth and G. Wiedenmann, Physica A 234, 819 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  16. This classication scheme may not encompass all proposed complexity measures, however;see [28].

  17. J. S. Shiner, M. Davison and P. T. Landsberg, in Dynamics, Synergetics, Autonomous AgentsNonlinear Systems Approaches to Cognitive Psychology and Cognitive Science, edited by W. Tschacher and J.-P. Dauwalder, World Scientific, Singapore, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  18. J. S. Shiner, M. Davison and P. T. Landsberg, Phys. Rev. E 59, 145 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  19. P. T. Landsberg, Phys. Lett. A 102, 171 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  20. P. T. Landsberg, Int. J. Quantum Chem., Symp 11A, 55 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  21. P. T. Landsberg, in On Self-Organization, edited by R.K. Mishra, D. Maass, and E. Zwierlein, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  22. When referring to specic measures of disorder, order or complexity, we enclose these words in quotation marks to distinguish the measures from the general concepts.

  23. J. S. Shiner, in: Self-Organization of Complex Structures: From Individual to Collective Dynamics, edited by F. Schweitzer, Gordon and Breach, London, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  24. A. Rényi, Probability Theory North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  25. P. Grassberger, Phys. Lett. A 97, 227 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  26. H. G. E. Hentschel and I. Procaccia, Physica D 8, 435 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  27. P. T. Landsberg and J. S. Shiner, Phys. Lett. A 245, 228 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  28. J. S. Shiner, M. Davison, and P.T. Landsberg, “Reply to comments on 'simple Measure for Complexity'”, accepted in Phys. Rev. E (2000).

  29. J. P. Crutchéld, D.P. Feldman, and C. R. Shalizi, “Comment on 'simple Measure for Complexity'”, to be published, Phys. Rev. E (2000).

  30. P.-M. Binder and N. Perry, “Comment on 'simple measure for complexity'”, to be published, Phys. Rev. E (2000).

  31. B. Mandelbrot, in: Structures of Language and Its Mathematical Aspects, edited by R. Jacobson, American Mathematical Society, New York, 1961. (See also [34])

    Google Scholar 

  32. R. Dawkins, The Blind Watchmaker, Penguin, London, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  33. M. Schroeder, Fractals, Chaos, Power Laws: Minutes from an Infinite Paradise, W. H. Freeman, New York, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shiner, J.S. Self-Organized Criticality: Self-Organized Complexity? The Disorder and "Simple Complexities" of Power Law Distributions. Open Systems & Information Dynamics 7, 131–138 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009652708715

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009652708715

Keywords

Navigation