Abstract
Observations were made of the surface breaking behaviour of a population of captive rays Raja. The behaviour was found to have a temporal link with a scheduled feeding event, and to be most common in animals assumed to be hungry. It is suggested that the behaviour is appetitive and is a method of foraging appropriate to the captive situation.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Appleby, M.C. and Lawrence, A.B. (1987) Food restriction as a cause of stereotypic behaviour in tethered gilts. Animal Production 45, 103-110.
Broom, D.M. and Johnson, K.G. (1993) Stress and Animal Welfare.London: Chapman and Hall. viii+ 211 pp.
Dantzer, R. (1986) Behavioural, physiological and functional aspects of stereotyped behaviour: a review and a re-interpretation. Journal of Animal Science 62, 1776-1786.
de Jonge, G. and Carlstead, K. (1987) Abnormal behaviour in farmed mink. Abstract. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 17, 375.
Martin P. and Bateson, P. (1986) Measuring behaviour: An Introductory Guide.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. xii + 200 pp.
Mason, G.J. (1991) Stereotypies: a critical review. Animal Behaviour 41(6), 1015-1037.
MINITAB (1996) MINITAB release 11. Minitab Inc., State College, PA, USA.
Ödberg, F. (1984) The altering of stereotypy levels: an example with captive fennecs (F. zerda). In Proceedings of the International Congress on Applied Ethology in Farm Animals(J. Unshelm, G. van Putten and K. Zeeb, ed.). Dalmstadt: KTBL. pp. 299-301.
Sokal, R.R. and Rholf, F.J. (1991) Biometry. Second edition. New York: Freeman. xix + 887 pp.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Scott, G., Hull, S. & Rollinson, D. Surface Breaking Behaviour in a Population of Captive Rays Raja: The Expression of a Need to Forage?. Aquarium Sciences and Conservation 2, 161–169 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009640022791
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009640022791