Skip to main content
Log in

Negotiated versus Cost-Based Transfer Pricing

  • Published:
Review of Accounting Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper studies an incomplete contracting model to compare the effectiveness of alternative transfer pricing mechanisms. Transfer pricing serves the dual purpose of guiding intracompany transfers and providing incentives for upfront investments at the divisional level. When transfer prices are determined through negotiation, divisional managers will have insufficient investment incentives due to “hold-up” problems. While cost-based transfer pricing can avoid such “hold-ups”, it does suffer from distortions in intracompany transfers. Our analysis shows that negotiation frequently performs better than a cost-based pricing system, though we identify circumstances under which cost-based transfer pricing emerges as the superior alternative.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amershi, A., and P. Cheng. (1990). “Intrafirm Resource Allocation: The Economics of Transfer Pricing and Cost Allocation in Accounting.” Contemporary Accounting Research 7, 61–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anctil, R., and S. Dutta. (1999). “Transfer Pricing, Decision Rights, and Divisional versus Firm-Wide Performance Evaluation.” The Accounting Review, forthcoming.

  • Baldenius, T. (1999). “Intrafirm Trade, Bargaining Power, and Specific Investments.” Working paper, U.C. Berkeley.

  • Baldenius, T., and S. Reichelstein. (1998). “Alternative Verfahren zur Bestimmung innerbetrieblicher Verrechnungspreise.” Zeitschrift f¨ur Betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung 50, 236–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • — and —. (1997). “Comparative Statics of Monopoly Pricing: ANote.” Working paper, U.C. Berkeley.

  • Che, Y., and D. Hausch. (1999). “Specific Investments and the Value of Contracting.” American Economic Review 89, 125–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, J., and J. Demski. (1998). “Profit Allocation Under Ancillary Trade.” Journal of Accounting Research 36, 71–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung, T. (1991). “Incomplete Contracts, Specific Investments, and Risk Sharing.” Review of Economic Studies 58, 1031–1042.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, R. (1985). The Transfer Pricing Problem: A Theory for Practice. Lexington: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, R., and H. White. (1988). “Price and Authority in Inter-Profit Center Transactions.” American Journal of Sociology 94(Supplement), 17–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edlin, A., and S. Reichelstein. (1995). “Specific Investment under Negotiated Transfer Pricing: An Efficiency Result.” The Accounting Review 70, 275–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edlin, A., and C. Shannon. (1998). “Strict Monotonicity in Comparative Statics.” Journal of Economic Theory 81, 201–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, S., and O. Hart. (1986). “The Costs and Benefits of Ownership: A Theory of Vertical and Lateral Integration.” Journal of Political Economy, 94, 691–719.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, D., and M. Mowen. (1994). Management Accounting. 3d ed. Cincinnati: South-Western.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, M., C. Kriebel, and A. Raviv. (1982). “Asymmetric Information, Incentives, and Intrafirm Resource Allocation.” Management Science 28, 604–620.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmstr¨om, B., and J. Tirole. (1991). “Transfer Pricing and Organizational Form.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 7, 201–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horngren, C., G. Foster, and S. Datar. (1997). Cost Accounting: A Managerial Emphasis. Annotated Instructor's Edition. 9th ed. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merchant, K. (1989). Rewarding Results: Motivating Profit Center Managers. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom, P., and J. Roberts. (1990). “Rationalizability, Learning, and Equilibrium in Games with Strategic Complementarities.” Econometrica 58, 1255–1278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mookherjee, D., and S. Reichelstein. (1992). “An Analysis of Alternative Transfer Pricing Mechanisms.” Seminar notes, U.C. Berkeley.

  • Price Waterhouse. (1984). Transfer Pricing Practices of American Industry. New York: Price Waterhouse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahay, S. (1997). “Studies in the Theory of Transfer Pricing.” Unpublished dissertation, U.C. Berkeley.

  • Schiller, U. (1997). “Information Management and Transfer Pricing with Divisional Autonomy.” Working paper, University of Cologne.

  • Shelanski, H. (1993). “Transfer Pricing and the Organization of Intrafirm Exchange.” Unpublished dissertation, U.C. Berkeley.

  • Tang, R. (1993). Transfer Pricing in the 1990s: Tax and Management Perspectives. Westport: Quorum Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tirole, J. (1988). The Theory of Industrial Organization. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Topkis, D. (1978). “Minimizing a Submodular Function on a Lattice.” Operations Research 26, 305–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaysman, I. (1996). “A Model of Cost-based Transfer Pricing.” Review of Accounting Studies 1, 73–08.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. (1998). “A Model of Negotiated Transfer Pricing.” Journal of Accounting and Economics 25, 349–384.

  • Wagenhofer, A. (1994). “Transfer Pricing under Asymmetric Information: AnEvaluation of Alternative Methods.” European Accounting Review 1, 71–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. (1985). The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baldenius, T., Reichelstein, S. & Sahay, S.A. Negotiated versus Cost-Based Transfer Pricing. Review of Accounting Studies 4, 67–91 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009638001487

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009638001487

Keywords

Navigation