Skip to main content
Log in

Conservation strategies for poorly surveyed taxa: a dung beetle (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae) case study from southern Africa

  • Published:
Journal of Insect Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite being the focus of an international research effort spanning decades, the spatial distribution of southern African scarab beetles remains poorly documented. As well as reinforcing the magnitude of the challenge facing biodiversity scientists, this raises real concerns about best practice conservation strategies in the absence of detailed distribution information. However, dung beetles appear to be well represented in established conservation areas. This apparent contradiction could be ascribed to anthropogenic transformation, successful conservation efforts, the presence of dung generalists and reserve-biased or mesic-biased dung beetle collection efforts. It is suggested that all of the above contribute to the observed pattern to varying degrees. The implications of selecting areas that are either rich in species, contain rare species or contain taxonomically distinct species from a group whose taxonomy is well known but for which inadequate distribution data exist are explored. Best practice, in the face of inadequate data, appears to revolve around a subtle interplay between advantages and disadvantages associated with data interpolation techniques, reserve selection algorithms that use criteria more robust than database rarity (such as taxonomic distinctiveness) and the long-term economic costs of proceeding with the data at hand versus investing in biological surveys.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Balmford, A. and Gaston, K.J.C. (1999) Why biodiversity surveys are good value. Nature 398, 204-5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bornemissza, G.F. (1976) The Australian dung beetle project 1965-1975. Aust. Meat Res. Comm. Rev. 30, 1-30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, A.L.V. (1986) Three new Afrotropical dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeinae) in the genera Kheper Janssens, Gymnopleurus Illiger and Onitis Fabricius, with notes on related species. J. ent. Soc. sth. Afr. 49, 373-87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, A.L.V. (1994) Associations of Afrotropical Coleoptera (Scarabaeidae: Aphodiidae: Staphylinidae: Hydrophilidae: Histeridae) with dung and decaying matter: implications for selection of fly-control agents for Australia. J. Nat. Hist. 28, 383-99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, A.L. (1997) Climatic and biogeographical associations of southern African dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae s. str.). Afr. J. Ecol. 35, 10-38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, A.J., Jenkinson, L.S., Lawton, J.H., Shorrocks, B. and Wood, S. (1998) Making mistakes when predicting shifts in species range in response to global warming. Nature 391, 783-6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Doube, B.M. (1991) Dung beetles of southern Africa. In Dung Beetle Ecology (I. Hanski and Y. Cambefort, eds), pp. 133-55. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drinkrow, D.R. and Cherry, M.I. (1995) Anuran distribution, diversity and conservation in South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. S. Afr. J. Zool. 30, 82-90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, P.B. (1991) Seasonal variation in the dung of African grazing mammals, and its consequences for coprophagous insects. Funct. Ecol. 5, 617-28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich, P.R. (1992) Population biology of checkerspot butterflies and the preservation of global biodiversity. Oikos 63, 6-12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faith, D.P. and Walker, P.A. (1996) Environmental diversity: on the best-possible use of surrogate data for assessing the relative biodiversity of sets of areas. Biodiv. Conserv. 5, 399-415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira, M.C. (1978) The genus Onitis F. of Africa south of the Sahara (Scarabaeidae, Coleoptera). Mem. Natl Mus. 10, 1-410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freitag, S., Hobson, C., Biggs, H.C. and van Jaarsveld, A.S. (1998) Testing for potential survey bias: the effect of roads, urban areas and nature reserves on a southern African mammal data set. Anim. Conserv. 1, 119-27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freitag, S. and van Jaarsveld, A.S. (1997) Relative occupancy, endemism, taxonomic distinctiveness and vulnerability: prioritising regional conservation actions. Biodiv. Conserv. 6, 211-32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freitag, S., van Jaarsveld, A.S. and Biggs, H.C. (1997) Ranking priority biodiversity areas: an iterative conservation value-based approach. Biol. Cons. 82, 263-72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fry, R. and Lonsdale, D. (1991) Introduction. In Habitat Conservation for Insects-a Neglected Green Issue (R. Fry and D. Lonsdale, eds), pp. 1-14. England: The Amateur Entomologist's Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaston, K.J. (1994) Rarity. London: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelderblom, C.M., Bronner, G.N., Lombard, A.T. and Taylor, P.J. (1995) Patterns of distribution and current protection status of the Carnivora, Chiroptera and Insectivora in South Africa. S. Afr. J. Zool. 30, 103-14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gotelli, N.J. and Graves, G.R. (1996) Null Models In Ecology. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heywood, V.H. (1994) The measurement of biodiversity and the politics of implementation. In Systematics and Conservation Evaluation (P.L. Forey, C.J. Humphries and R.I. Vane-Wright, eds), pp. 15-22. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holm, E. and Scholtz, C.H. (1979) A revision of the genus Pachysoma M'Leay with an evaluation of the subtribe Pachysomina Ferreira and its genera (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). J. ent. Soc. sth. Afr. 42, 225-44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howden, H.F. and Scholtz, C.H. (1987) A revision of the African genus Odontoloma Boheman (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae). J. ent. Soc. sth. Afr. 50, 155-92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, M.L. and Hutchinson, A. (1994) The virtues and shortcomings of parochialism: conserving species that are locally rare, but globally common. Conserv. Biol. 8, 1163-65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Infield, M. (1988) Attitudes of a rural community towards conservation and a local conservation area in Natal, South Africa. Biol. Cons. 45, 21-46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leathwick, J.R., Burns, B.R. and Clarkson, B.D. (1998) Environmental correlates of tree alpha-diversity in New Zealand primary forests. Ecography 21, 235-46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lombard, A.T. (1995) The problems with multi-species conservation: do hotspots, ideal reserves and existing reserves coincide? S. Afr. J. Zool. 30, 145-63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lombard, A.T., Nicholls, A.O. and August, P.V. (1995) Where should nature reserves be located in South Africa? A snake's perspective. Conserv. Biol. 9, 363-72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Low, A.B. and Rebelo, A.G. (1996) Vegetation of South Africa, Lesotho, and Swaziland. Pretoria: Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margules, C.R., Cresswell, I.D. and Nicholls, A.O. (1994) A scientific basis for establishing networks of protected areas. In Systematics and Conservation Evaluation (P.L. Forey, C.J. Humphries and R.I. Vane-Wright, eds), pp. 327-50. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margules, C.R. and Redhead, T.D. (1995) BioRap: Guidelines for Using the BioRap Methodology and Tools. Australia: CSIRO.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGeoch, M.A. (1998) The selection, testing and application of terrestrial insects as bioindicators. Biol. Rev. 73, 181-201.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeely, J.A. (1992) The sinking ark: pollution and the worldwide loss of biodiversity. Biodiv. Conserv. 1, 2-18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mostert, L.E. and Holm, E. (1982) Notes on the flightless Scarabaeina (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) with a description of a new species. Cimbebasia (A) 5, 273-84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mostert, L.E. and Scholtz, C.H. (1986) Systematics of the subtribe Scarabaeina (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Entomol. Mem. 65, 1-25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, A.O. and Margules, C.R. (1993) An upgraded reserve selection algorithm. Biol. Conserv. 50, 51-75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paschalidis, K.M. (1974) The genus Sisyphus Latr. (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) in southern Africa. MSc thesis, University of Rhodes, Grahamstown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimm, S.L. and Lawton, J.H. (1998) Planning for biodiversity. Science 279, 2068-9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prendergast, J.R., Quinn, R.M., Lawton, J.H., Eversham, B.C. and Gibbons, D.W. (1993) Rare species, the coincidence of diversity hotspots and conservation strategies. Nature 365, 335-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pressey, R.L., Humphries, C.J., Margules, C.R., Vane-Wright, R.I. and Williams, P.H. (1993) Beyond opportunism: key principles for systematic reserve selection. TREE 8, 124-8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressey, R.L. and Nicholls, A.O. (1989) Efficiency in conservation evaluation: scoring versus iterative processes. Biol. Conserv. 50, 199-218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressey, R.L., Possingham, H.P. and Day, J.R. (1997) Effectiveness of alternative heuristic algorithms for identifying indicative minimum requirements for conservation reserves. Biol. Conserv. 80, 207-19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, D. and Cowling, R. (1993) Biodiversity of ecosystem processes: opportunities in Mediterranean-type ecosystems. TREE 8, 79-80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samways, M.J. (1994) Insect Conservation Biology. London: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholtz, C.H. and Chown, S.L. (1993) Insect conservation and extensive agriculture: the savanna of southern Africa. In Perspectives on Insect Conservation (K.J. Gaston, T.R. New and M.J. Samways, eds), pp. 75-95. Andover: Intercept.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholtz, C.H. and Evans, A.V. (1987) A revision of the African Ochodaeidae (Coleoptera: Scarabaeoidea). J. ent. Soc. sth. Afr. 50, 399-426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholtz, C.H. and Holm, E. (1996) Order Coleoptera. In Insects of Southern Africa (C.H. Scholtz and E. Holm, eds), pp. 188-280. Pretoria: University of Pretoria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholtz, C.H. and Howden, H.F. (1987a) A revision of the southern African genus Epirinus Reiche (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae). J. ent. Soc. sth. Afr. 50, 121-54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholtz, C.H. and Howden, H.F. (1987b) A revision of the African Canthonina (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae). J. ent. Soc. sth. Afr. 50, 75-119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegfried, W.R. (1991) Conservation status of terrestrial ecosystems and their biota. In Biotic Diversity in Southern Africa: Concepts and Conservation (B.J. Huntley, ed.), pp. 186-201. Cape Town: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegfried, W.R. and Brown, C.A. (1992) The distribution and protection of mammals endemic to southern Africa. S. Afr. J. Wildl. Res. 22, 11-16.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Jaarsveld, A.S., Freitag, S., Chown, S.L., Muller, C., Koch, S.O., Hull, H., Bellamy, C., Krüger, M., Endrödy-Younga, S., Mansell, M.W. and Scholtz, C.H. (1998a) Biodiversity assessment and conservation strategies. Science 279, 2106-8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van Jaarsveld, A.S., Gaston, K.J., Chown, S.L. and Freitag, S. (1998b) Throwing biodiversity out with the binary data? S. Afr. J. Sci. 94, 210-214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vane-Wright, R.I., Humphries, C.J. and Williams, P.H. (1991) What to protect?-Systematics and the agony of choice. Biol. Conserv. 55, 235-54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waterhouse, D.F. (1977) The biological control of dung. In The Insects (T. Eisner and E.O. Wilson, eds), pp. 314-322. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wessels, K.J., van Jaarsveld, A.S., Grimbeek, J.D. and van der Linde, M.J. (1998) An evaluation of the gradsect biological survey method. Biodiv. Conserv. 7, 1093-121.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Koch, S., Chown, S., Davis, A. et al. Conservation strategies for poorly surveyed taxa: a dung beetle (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae) case study from southern Africa. Journal of Insect Conservation 4, 45–56 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009634318926

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009634318926

Navigation