Abstract
Despite being the focus of an international research effort spanning decades, the spatial distribution of southern African scarab beetles remains poorly documented. As well as reinforcing the magnitude of the challenge facing biodiversity scientists, this raises real concerns about best practice conservation strategies in the absence of detailed distribution information. However, dung beetles appear to be well represented in established conservation areas. This apparent contradiction could be ascribed to anthropogenic transformation, successful conservation efforts, the presence of dung generalists and reserve-biased or mesic-biased dung beetle collection efforts. It is suggested that all of the above contribute to the observed pattern to varying degrees. The implications of selecting areas that are either rich in species, contain rare species or contain taxonomically distinct species from a group whose taxonomy is well known but for which inadequate distribution data exist are explored. Best practice, in the face of inadequate data, appears to revolve around a subtle interplay between advantages and disadvantages associated with data interpolation techniques, reserve selection algorithms that use criteria more robust than database rarity (such as taxonomic distinctiveness) and the long-term economic costs of proceeding with the data at hand versus investing in biological surveys.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Balmford, A. and Gaston, K.J.C. (1999) Why biodiversity surveys are good value. Nature 398, 204-5.
Bornemissza, G.F. (1976) The Australian dung beetle project 1965-1975. Aust. Meat Res. Comm. Rev. 30, 1-30.
Davis, A.L.V. (1986) Three new Afrotropical dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeinae) in the genera Kheper Janssens, Gymnopleurus Illiger and Onitis Fabricius, with notes on related species. J. ent. Soc. sth. Afr. 49, 373-87.
Davis, A.L.V. (1994) Associations of Afrotropical Coleoptera (Scarabaeidae: Aphodiidae: Staphylinidae: Hydrophilidae: Histeridae) with dung and decaying matter: implications for selection of fly-control agents for Australia. J. Nat. Hist. 28, 383-99.
Davis, A.L. (1997) Climatic and biogeographical associations of southern African dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae s. str.). Afr. J. Ecol. 35, 10-38.
Davis, A.J., Jenkinson, L.S., Lawton, J.H., Shorrocks, B. and Wood, S. (1998) Making mistakes when predicting shifts in species range in response to global warming. Nature 391, 783-6.
Doube, B.M. (1991) Dung beetles of southern Africa. In Dung Beetle Ecology (I. Hanski and Y. Cambefort, eds), pp. 133-55. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Drinkrow, D.R. and Cherry, M.I. (1995) Anuran distribution, diversity and conservation in South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. S. Afr. J. Zool. 30, 82-90.
Edwards, P.B. (1991) Seasonal variation in the dung of African grazing mammals, and its consequences for coprophagous insects. Funct. Ecol. 5, 617-28.
Ehrlich, P.R. (1992) Population biology of checkerspot butterflies and the preservation of global biodiversity. Oikos 63, 6-12.
Faith, D.P. and Walker, P.A. (1996) Environmental diversity: on the best-possible use of surrogate data for assessing the relative biodiversity of sets of areas. Biodiv. Conserv. 5, 399-415.
Ferreira, M.C. (1978) The genus Onitis F. of Africa south of the Sahara (Scarabaeidae, Coleoptera). Mem. Natl Mus. 10, 1-410.
Freitag, S., Hobson, C., Biggs, H.C. and van Jaarsveld, A.S. (1998) Testing for potential survey bias: the effect of roads, urban areas and nature reserves on a southern African mammal data set. Anim. Conserv. 1, 119-27.
Freitag, S. and van Jaarsveld, A.S. (1997) Relative occupancy, endemism, taxonomic distinctiveness and vulnerability: prioritising regional conservation actions. Biodiv. Conserv. 6, 211-32.
Freitag, S., van Jaarsveld, A.S. and Biggs, H.C. (1997) Ranking priority biodiversity areas: an iterative conservation value-based approach. Biol. Cons. 82, 263-72.
Fry, R. and Lonsdale, D. (1991) Introduction. In Habitat Conservation for Insects-a Neglected Green Issue (R. Fry and D. Lonsdale, eds), pp. 1-14. England: The Amateur Entomologist's Society.
Gaston, K.J. (1994) Rarity. London: Chapman & Hall.
Gelderblom, C.M., Bronner, G.N., Lombard, A.T. and Taylor, P.J. (1995) Patterns of distribution and current protection status of the Carnivora, Chiroptera and Insectivora in South Africa. S. Afr. J. Zool. 30, 103-14.
Gotelli, N.J. and Graves, G.R. (1996) Null Models In Ecology. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press.
Heywood, V.H. (1994) The measurement of biodiversity and the politics of implementation. In Systematics and Conservation Evaluation (P.L. Forey, C.J. Humphries and R.I. Vane-Wright, eds), pp. 15-22. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Holm, E. and Scholtz, C.H. (1979) A revision of the genus Pachysoma M'Leay with an evaluation of the subtribe Pachysomina Ferreira and its genera (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). J. ent. Soc. sth. Afr. 42, 225-44.
Howden, H.F. and Scholtz, C.H. (1987) A revision of the African genus Odontoloma Boheman (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae). J. ent. Soc. sth. Afr. 50, 155-92.
Hunter, M.L. and Hutchinson, A. (1994) The virtues and shortcomings of parochialism: conserving species that are locally rare, but globally common. Conserv. Biol. 8, 1163-65.
Infield, M. (1988) Attitudes of a rural community towards conservation and a local conservation area in Natal, South Africa. Biol. Cons. 45, 21-46.
Leathwick, J.R., Burns, B.R. and Clarkson, B.D. (1998) Environmental correlates of tree alpha-diversity in New Zealand primary forests. Ecography 21, 235-46.
Lombard, A.T. (1995) The problems with multi-species conservation: do hotspots, ideal reserves and existing reserves coincide? S. Afr. J. Zool. 30, 145-63.
Lombard, A.T., Nicholls, A.O. and August, P.V. (1995) Where should nature reserves be located in South Africa? A snake's perspective. Conserv. Biol. 9, 363-72.
Low, A.B. and Rebelo, A.G. (1996) Vegetation of South Africa, Lesotho, and Swaziland. Pretoria: Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism.
Margules, C.R., Cresswell, I.D. and Nicholls, A.O. (1994) A scientific basis for establishing networks of protected areas. In Systematics and Conservation Evaluation (P.L. Forey, C.J. Humphries and R.I. Vane-Wright, eds), pp. 327-50. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Margules, C.R. and Redhead, T.D. (1995) BioRap: Guidelines for Using the BioRap Methodology and Tools. Australia: CSIRO.
McGeoch, M.A. (1998) The selection, testing and application of terrestrial insects as bioindicators. Biol. Rev. 73, 181-201.
McNeely, J.A. (1992) The sinking ark: pollution and the worldwide loss of biodiversity. Biodiv. Conserv. 1, 2-18.
Mostert, L.E. and Holm, E. (1982) Notes on the flightless Scarabaeina (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) with a description of a new species. Cimbebasia (A) 5, 273-84.
Mostert, L.E. and Scholtz, C.H. (1986) Systematics of the subtribe Scarabaeina (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Entomol. Mem. 65, 1-25.
Nicholls, A.O. and Margules, C.R. (1993) An upgraded reserve selection algorithm. Biol. Conserv. 50, 51-75.
Paschalidis, K.M. (1974) The genus Sisyphus Latr. (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) in southern Africa. MSc thesis, University of Rhodes, Grahamstown.
Pimm, S.L. and Lawton, J.H. (1998) Planning for biodiversity. Science 279, 2068-9.
Prendergast, J.R., Quinn, R.M., Lawton, J.H., Eversham, B.C. and Gibbons, D.W. (1993) Rare species, the coincidence of diversity hotspots and conservation strategies. Nature 365, 335-7.
Pressey, R.L., Humphries, C.J., Margules, C.R., Vane-Wright, R.I. and Williams, P.H. (1993) Beyond opportunism: key principles for systematic reserve selection. TREE 8, 124-8.
Pressey, R.L. and Nicholls, A.O. (1989) Efficiency in conservation evaluation: scoring versus iterative processes. Biol. Conserv. 50, 199-218.
Pressey, R.L., Possingham, H.P. and Day, J.R. (1997) Effectiveness of alternative heuristic algorithms for identifying indicative minimum requirements for conservation reserves. Biol. Conserv. 80, 207-19.
Richardson, D. and Cowling, R. (1993) Biodiversity of ecosystem processes: opportunities in Mediterranean-type ecosystems. TREE 8, 79-80.
Samways, M.J. (1994) Insect Conservation Biology. London: Chapman & Hall.
Scholtz, C.H. and Chown, S.L. (1993) Insect conservation and extensive agriculture: the savanna of southern Africa. In Perspectives on Insect Conservation (K.J. Gaston, T.R. New and M.J. Samways, eds), pp. 75-95. Andover: Intercept.
Scholtz, C.H. and Evans, A.V. (1987) A revision of the African Ochodaeidae (Coleoptera: Scarabaeoidea). J. ent. Soc. sth. Afr. 50, 399-426.
Scholtz, C.H. and Holm, E. (1996) Order Coleoptera. In Insects of Southern Africa (C.H. Scholtz and E. Holm, eds), pp. 188-280. Pretoria: University of Pretoria.
Scholtz, C.H. and Howden, H.F. (1987a) A revision of the southern African genus Epirinus Reiche (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae). J. ent. Soc. sth. Afr. 50, 121-54.
Scholtz, C.H. and Howden, H.F. (1987b) A revision of the African Canthonina (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae). J. ent. Soc. sth. Afr. 50, 75-119.
Siegfried, W.R. (1991) Conservation status of terrestrial ecosystems and their biota. In Biotic Diversity in Southern Africa: Concepts and Conservation (B.J. Huntley, ed.), pp. 186-201. Cape Town: Oxford University Press.
Siegfried, W.R. and Brown, C.A. (1992) The distribution and protection of mammals endemic to southern Africa. S. Afr. J. Wildl. Res. 22, 11-16.
van Jaarsveld, A.S., Freitag, S., Chown, S.L., Muller, C., Koch, S.O., Hull, H., Bellamy, C., Krüger, M., Endrödy-Younga, S., Mansell, M.W. and Scholtz, C.H. (1998a) Biodiversity assessment and conservation strategies. Science 279, 2106-8.
van Jaarsveld, A.S., Gaston, K.J., Chown, S.L. and Freitag, S. (1998b) Throwing biodiversity out with the binary data? S. Afr. J. Sci. 94, 210-214.
Vane-Wright, R.I., Humphries, C.J. and Williams, P.H. (1991) What to protect?-Systematics and the agony of choice. Biol. Conserv. 55, 235-54.
Waterhouse, D.F. (1977) The biological control of dung. In The Insects (T. Eisner and E.O. Wilson, eds), pp. 314-322. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman and Company.
Wessels, K.J., van Jaarsveld, A.S., Grimbeek, J.D. and van der Linde, M.J. (1998) An evaluation of the gradsect biological survey method. Biodiv. Conserv. 7, 1093-121.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Koch, S., Chown, S., Davis, A. et al. Conservation strategies for poorly surveyed taxa: a dung beetle (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae) case study from southern Africa. Journal of Insect Conservation 4, 45–56 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009634318926
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009634318926