Abstract
This paper presents a view of social intelligence as a multiple and inter-agent property. On one hand, some fundamental requisites for a theory of mind in society are presented in the paper. On the other, the role of objective social consequences of social action are argued to multiply agents&2018; mental properties. Starting from the problems posed by social situatedness the main mental ingredients necessary for solving these problems are identified. After an operational definition of a socially situated agent, a variety of tasks or demands will be shown to impinge on socially situated agents. The specific cognitive requirements needed for individual agents to accomplish these tasks will be identified. However, these cognitive requirements are shown insufficient to answer the social demands previously identified. In particular, the effective execution of individual social action seems to produce a number of interesting social consequences which extend to and empower the individual action. The follow-up hypothesis is that further cognitive properties consequently arise at the individual level, and contribute to reproduce and reinforce multiple agents&2018; intelligence.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alterman, R. (1988), "Adaptive Planning," Cognitive Science, 12, 393–421.
Axelrod, R. (1984), The Evolution of Cooperation, Basic Books, New York.
Axelrod, R. (1990), "The Emergence of Cooperation Among Egoists," in P.K. Moser (Ed.) Rationality in Action. Contemporary Approaches, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Axelrod, R. (1997), The Complexity of Cooperation. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Bandura, A. (1977), Social Learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice Hall.
Binmore, K. (1994), Game Theory and the Social Contract. Playing Fair. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Carley, K.M. and A. Newell (1994), "The Nature of the Social Agent," Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 19(4), 221–262.
Carley, K.M. and M. Prietula (1994), "ACTS Theory: Extending the Model of Bounded Rationality, in Computational Organizaton Theory," in K.M. Carley and M. Prietula (Eds.), Computational Organization Theory, Hillsdale, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Castelfranchi, C. (1995), "Commitments: From Individual Intentions to Groups and Organizations," Proc. of the 1st International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems, ICMAS-95, June 12–14, AAAI Press/The MIT Press, San Francisco, CA/Menlo Park, CA.
Castelfranchi, C. (1996), "Reasons: Belief Support and Goal-Dynamics," Journal of Mathware & Soft Computing, 3(1/2), 233–247.
Castelfranchi, C. (1998), "Modelling Social Action for AI Agents," Artificial Intelligence, 103, 157–182.
Castelfranchi, C. and R. Conte (1996), "Distributed Artificial Intelligence and Social Science: Critical Issues," in G.M.P. O'Hare and N.R. Jennings (Eds.), Distributed Artificial Intelligence: An Introduction, Wiley, Sixth Generation Computer Technology Series.
Castelfranchi, C. and R. Conte (1998), "Limits of Economic Rationality for Agents and MA Systems," Robotics and Autonomous Systems, Special issue on Multi-Agent Rationality, 24, 127–139.
Castelfranchi, C. and R. Falcone (1998), "Principles of Trust for MAS: Cognitive Anatomy, Social Importance, and Quantification," Proceedings of the Third International Conference of Multi-Agent Systems (ICMAS'98), Paris, pp. 72–79.
Cavedon, L. and L. Sonenberg (1998), "On Social Commitment, Roles, and Preferred Goals," Proc. of Third International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems (ICMAS'98), Paris, pp. 80–88.
Cohen, P.R. and H.J. Levesque (1990), Intention is Choice with Commitmentitment, Artificial Intelligence, 42: 213–261.
Conte, R. and C. Castelfranchi (1995), Cognitive and Social Action. UCL Press, London.
Conte, R., M. Miceli and C. Castelfranchi (1991), "Limits and Levels of Cooperation. Disentangling Various Types of Prosocial Interaction," in Y. Demazeau, J.P. Mueller (Eds.), Decentralized AI-2, Armsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 147–157.
Conte, R. (1996), "Foundations of Rational Interaction in Cognitive Agents: A Computational Approach," in W. Liebrand and D. Messick (Eds.) Frontiers in Social Dilemmas Research, Berlin: Springer.
Conte, R., C. Castelfranchi and F. Dignum (1998), "Autonomous Norm Acceptance," in J. Mueller (Ed.), Intelligent Agents V, Berlin: Springer.
Cook, K.S. and R.M. Emerson (1978), Power, Equity and Commitment in Exchange Networks American Sociological Review, 43, 721–739.
Dignum, F. and R. e Conte (1997), "Intentional Agents and Goal Formation," in M. Singh et al. (Ed.). Proceedings of the 4th International workshop on Agent Theories Architectures and Languages, Providence, USA.
Edney, J.J. (1980). The commons problem: Alternative perspectives. American Psychologist, 35, 131–150.
Epstein, J.M. and R.L. Axtell (1996), Growing Artificial Societies: Social Science from the Bottom Up. The Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC & The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Flache, A. (1996), "The Double Edge of Networks: An Analysis of the Effect of Informal Networks on Cooperation in Social Dilemmas," PhD Thesis, Thesis Publishers, Amsterdam.
Hardin, G. (1968), "The Tragedy of the Commons," Science, 162, 1243–1248.
Hardin, R. (1982), Collective action, Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore.
Hegselmann, R. (1996), "Modelling Social Dynamics by Cellular Automata," in K.G. Troitzsch, U. Mueller, N. Gilbert, and J. Doran (Eds.), Social Sience Microsimulation, Springer: Heidelberg.
Holland, J.H. (1992), "Complex Adaptive Systems," Daedalus, 121, 17–30.
Holland, J.H. (1995), Hidden Order: How Adaptation Builds Complexity, MIT Press, Reading, MA.
Homans, G.C. (1951), The Human Group, Harcourt, NY.
Homans, G.C. (1974), Social Behavior. Its Elementary Forms. Harcourt, NY.
Jennings, N. (1995), "Commitment and Conventions: The Foundation of Coordination in Multi-Agent Systems," The Knowledge Engineering Review, 8.
Kramer, R.M. and M.B. Brewer (1986), "Social Group Identity and the Emergence of Cooperation in Resource Conservation Dilemmas," in H. Wilke, C. Rutter and D.M. Messick (Eds.), Experimental Studies of Social Dilemmas, Frankfurt: Peter Lang Publishing Co.
Kramer, R.M. and L. Goldman (1995), "Helping the Group or Helping Yourself? Social Motives and Group Identity in Resource Dilemmas," in D.A. Schroeder (Ed.), Social Dilemmas. Perspectives on Individuals and Groups, Prager: London.
Liebrand, W. and D. Messick (Eds.) (1996), Frontiers in Social Dilemmas Research, Berlin: Springer.
Macy, M. and A. Flache (1995), "Beyond Rationality in Models of Choice," Annual Review of Sociology, 21, 73–91.
Margolis, H. (1982), Selfishness, Altruism and Rationality, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Messick, D.M. (1974), "When a Little “Group Interest” Goes a Long Way: Social Motives and Union Joining," Orgaizational Behavior and Human Performance, 12, 331–334.
Miceli, M., A. Cesta, and P. Rizzo (1995), "Distributed Artificial Intelligence from a Socio-Cognitive Standpoint: Looking at Reasons for Interaction," AI and Society, 9, 287–320.
Olson, M. (1965), The Logic of Collective Action. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Pfeffer, J. (1981), Power in Organizations, Pitman, London.
Rao, A.S. and M.P. Georgeff (1991), "Modelling Rational Agents within a BDI Architecture," Proceedings of the International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, Kaufmann, San Mateo, pp. 473–485.
Schroeder, D.A. (Ed.) (1995), Social Dilemmas. Perspectives on Individuals and Groups. Praeger, London.
Searle, J.R. (1990), "Collective Intentions and Actions," in P.R Cohen, J. Morgan and M.A. Pollack (Eds.) Intentions in Communication, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 401–415.
Taylor, M. (1987), The Possibility of Cooperation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Tuomela, R. (1992), "Group Beliefs," Synthese, 91, 285–318.
Watkins, C. (1989), "Learning from Delayed Rewards," PhD Dissertation, Dept. of Psychology, Cambridge Univ., UK.
Weibull, J.W. (1996), Evolutionary Game Theory. The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.
Yamagishi, T. and K.S. Cook (1993), "Generalized Exchange and Social Dilemmas," Social Psychology Quarterly, 56, 235–249.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Conte, R. Social Intelligence Among Autonomous Agents. Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory 5, 203–228 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009634206383
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009634206383