Skip to main content
Log in

Valuation of a Credit Swap of the Basket Type

  • Published:
Review of Derivatives Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article provides a simple model to value a credit swap ofthe basket type. Unlike the previous literature, we considerthe joint survival probability of occurrence times of creditevents in terms of stochastic intensity processes under the assumptionof conditional independence. Based on the joint survival probability,such a credit swap can be valued under the risk-neutral valuationframework. Assuming that the default intensity processes followthe extended Vasicek model with a correlation structure, an analyticexpression of the valuation formula is derived. Some numericalexample is given to demonstrate the usefulness of our model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Das, S. R., and P. Tufano. (1996). “Pricing Credit-Sensitive Debt when Interest Rates, Credit Ratings and Credit Spreads are Stochastic,” Journal of Financial Engineering 5, 161–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffie, D. (1998). “First-to-Default Valuation.” Working paper, Stanford University.

  • Duffie, D. (1999). “Credit Swap Valuation,” Financial Analyst Journal (January/February), 73–87.

  • Duffie, D., and K. Singleton. (1997). “An Econometric Model of the Term Structure of Interest Rate SwapYields,” Journal of Finance 52, 1287–1321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffie, D., and K. Singleton. (1999). “Modeling Term Structures of Defaultable Bonds,” Review of Financial Studies 12, 687–720.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, J., and A. White. (1990). “Pricing Interest-Rate-Derivative Securities,” Review of Financial Studies 3, 573–592.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inui, K., and M. Kijima. (1998). “A Markovian Framework in Multi-Factor Heath-Jarrow-Morton Models,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 33, 423–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarrow, R. A., D. Lando, and S. M. Turnbull. (1997). “A Markov Model for the Term Structure of Credit Risk Spread,” Review of Financial Studies 10, 481–523.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarrow, R. A., and S. M. Turnbull. (1995). “Pricing Options on Financial Securities Subject to Default Risk,” Journal of Finance 50, 53–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlin, S., and H. M. Taylor. (1981). A Second Course in Stochastic Processes. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kijima, M. (1999). “A Gaussian Term Structure Model of Credit Risk Spreads and Valuation of Yield-Spread Options.” Working paper, Tokyo Metropolitan University.

  • Kijima, M., and K. Komoribayashi. (1998). “A Markov Chain Model for Valuing Credit Risk Derivatives,” Journal of Derivatives 6, Fall, 97–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kijima, M., H. Li, and M. Shaked. (2000). “Stochastic Processes in Reliability.” In C. R. Rao and D. N. Shanbhag (eds.), Stochastic Processes: Theory and Methods.

  • Kijima, M., and Y. Muromachi. (2000). “Credit Events and the Valuation of Credit Derivatives of Basket Type,” Review of Derivatives Research 4, 53–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lando, D. (1994). “Three Essays on Contingent Claims Pricing.” Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Statistics, Cornell University.

  • Madan, D., and H. Unal. (1998). “Pricing the Risks of Default,” Review of Derivatives Research 2, 121–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madan, D., and H. Unal. (2000). “ATwo-Factor Hazard Rate Model for Pricing Risky Debt and the Term Structure of Credit Spreads,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 35, 43–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoyanov, J. (1987). Counterexamples in Probability. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kijima, M. Valuation of a Credit Swap of the Basket Type. Review of Derivatives Research 4, 81–97 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009628513231

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009628513231

Navigation