Skip to main content
Log in

The Stock Price Impact of Mandated Accounting Charges on Rate-Regulated Firms

  • Published:
Review of Accounting Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study seeks to determine ifmore highly leveraged rate-regulated firms are positively affectedby accounting standards that increase recognized expenses. Itfinds a positive relation between leverage and market reactionsto SFAS 106 for rate-regulated firms. Further, results indicatethat this positive relation is an increasing function of thelevel of financial leverage and the extent to which the regulatoryclimate is favorable.

The study makes severalcontributions to the accounting literature. It documents thatfor rate-regulated firms, the relation between financial leverageand the market impact of an accounting standard that increasesrecognized expenses is contrary to that documented for the generalpopulation of firms. It identifies factors that affect the strengthof the positive relation between financial leverage and rate-regulatedfirms' price reactions to accounting standards that increaserecognized expenses. It also has potential implications for futureresearch on the incremental informativeness of cash flows becauseit helps to identify settings in which cash flow informationis likely to be particularly important.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beaver, W., C. Eger, S. Ryan, and M. Wolfson. (1989). “Financial Reporting, Supplemental Disclosures, and Bank Share Prices.” Journal of Accounting Research 27, 157–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beneish, M., and E. Press. (1993). “Costs of Technical Violation of Accounting-Based Debt Covenants.” The Accounting Review 68, 233–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, V. L. (1989). “Capital Markets Research During the 1980s: A Critical Review.” In T. Frecka (ed.), University of Illinois Golden Jubilee Symposium, pp. 72–120.

  • Bernard, V. L., and T. Stober. (1989). “The Nature and Amount of Information in Cash Flows and Accruals.” The Accounting Review 64, 624–652.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, R. (1981). “Valuation of Earnings Components in the Electric Utility Industry.” The Accounting Review 56, 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, D. W., M. Rozeff, and D. Dhaliwal. (1981). “The Economic Determinants of the Market Reaction to Proposed Mandatory Accounting Changes in the Oil and Gas Industry: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.” Journal of Accounting and Economics 3, 37–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, W., and P. R. Chandy. (1983). “The Regulatory Environment for Public Utilities: Indications of the Importance of the Political Process.” Financial Analysts Journal, 50–53.

  • Dhaliwal, D., and S. R. Reynolds. (1994). “The Effect of Default Risk of Debt on the Earnings Response Coefficient.” The Accounting Review 69, 412–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • D'souza, Julia. (1998). “Rate-Regulated Enterprises and Mandated Accounting Changes: The Case of Electric Utilities and SFAS 106.” The Accounting Review 73, 387–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duke, J., and H. Hunt. (1990). “An Empirical Examination of Debt Covenant Restrictions and Accounting Related Debt Proxies.” Journal of Accounting and Economics 12, 45–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Espahbodi, H., E. Strock, and H. Tehranian. (1991). “Impact on Equity Prices of Pronouncements Related to Nonpension Postretirement Benefits.” Journal of Accounting and Economics 14, 323–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fazzari, S., R. Hubbard, and B. Petersen. (1988). “Financing Constraints and Corporate Investments.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 141–195.

  • Hortwitz, B., and R. Kolodny. (1980). “The Economic Effect of Involuntary Uniformity in Financial Reporting and R&D Expenditures.” Journal of Accounting Research 18 (Supplement), 38–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imhoff, E., and J. Thomas. (1988). “Economic Consequences of Accounting Standards: The Lease Disclosure Rule Change.” Journal of Accounting and Economics 10, 277–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khurana, I., and M. Loudder. (1994). “The Economic Consequences of SFAS 106 in Rate-Regulated Enterprises.” The Accounting Review 69, 364–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lev, B. (1979). “The Impact of Accounting Regulation on the Stock Market: The Case of Oil and Gas Companies.” The Accounting Review 54, 485–503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lys, T. (1984). “Mandated Accounting Changes and Debt Covenants: The Case of Oil and Gas Accounting.” Journal of Accounting and Economics 6, 39–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, M. (1984). “The Capital Structure Puzzle.” Journal of Finance 39, 575–592.

    Google Scholar 

  • Press, E., and J. Weintrop. (1990). “Accounting-Based Constraints in Public and Private Debt Agreements: Their Association with Leverage and Impact on Accounting Choice.” Journal of Accounting and Economics 12, 65–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sefcik, S., and R. Thompson. (1986). “An Approach to Statistical Inference in Cross-Sectional Models with Security Abnormal Returns as Dependent Variable.” Journal of Accounting Research 24, 316–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schipper, K., and R. Thompson. (1983). “The Impact of Merger Related Regulations on the Shareholders of Acquiring Firms.” Journal of Accounting Research 21, 184–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwert, G. W. (1981). “Using Financial Data to Measure the Effects of Regulation.” Journal of Law and Economics 24, 121–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, H. (1980). “A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity.” Econometrica 48, 817–838.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

D'Souza, J. The Stock Price Impact of Mandated Accounting Charges on Rate-Regulated Firms. Review of Accounting Studies 5, 235–257 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009616727227

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009616727227

Keywords

Navigation