Reproducibility testing of RAPD, AFLP and SSR markers in plants by a network of European laboratories


A number of PCR-based techniques can be used to detect polymorphisms in plants. For their wide-scale usage in germplasm characterisation and breeding it is important that these marker technologies can be exchanged between laboratories, which in turn requires that they can be standardised to yield reproducible results, so that direct collation and comparison of the data are possible. This article describes a network experiment involving several European laboratories, in which the reproducibility of three popular molecular marker techniques was examined: random-amplified fragment length polymorphism (RAPD), amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) and sequence-tagged microsatellites (SSR). For each technique, an optimal system was chosen, which had been standardised and routinely used by one laboratory. This system (genetic screening package) was distributed to different participating laboratories in the network and the results obtained compared with those of the original sender. Different experiences were gained in this exchange experiment with the different techniques. RAPDs proved difficult to reproduce. For AFLPs, a single-band difference was observed in one track, whilst SSR alleles were amplified by all laboratories, but small differences in their sizing were obtained.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.


  1. 1.

    Williams JGK, Kubelik AR, Livak KJ, Raflaski JA, Tingey SV: DNA polymorphism amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers. Nucl Acids Res 18: 6531–6535 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Welsh J, McClelland M: Fingerprinting genomes using PCR with arbitrary primers. Nucl Acids Res 18:7213–7218 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Büuscher N, Zyprian E, Blaich R: Identification of grapevine cultivars by DNA analyses: Pitfalls of random amplified polymorphic DNA techniques using 10 mer primers. Vitis 32: 187–188 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Devos KM, Gale MD: The use of random amplified polymorphic DNA markers in wheat. Theor Appl Genet 84: 567–572 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    He Q, Viljanen MK, Mertsola J: Effects of thermocyclers and primers on the reproducibility of banding patterns in randomly amplified polymorphic DNAanalysis. Mol Cell Probes 8: 155–160 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    MacPherson JM, Eckstein PE, Scoles GJ, Gajadhar AA: Variability of the random amplified polymorphic DNA assay among thermal cyclers, and effects of primer and DNA concentration. Mol Cell Probes 7: 293–299 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Meunier JR, Grimont PA: Factors affecting reproducibility of random amplified polymorphic DNA fingerprinting. Res Microbiol 144: 373–379 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Yu K, Pauls KP: Optimization of the PCR program for RAPD analysis. Nucl Acids Res 20: 2606 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Zabeau M, Vos P: Selective restriction fragment amplification: a general method for DNA fingerprinting. European Patent Application, publication EP 0534858-A1, No. 92402629.7 (1993).

  10. 10.

    Vos P, Hogers R, Bleeker M, Reijans M, van de Lee T, Hornes M, Frijters A, Pot J, Peleman J, Kuiper M, Zabeau M: AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucl Acids Res 23: 4407–4414 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Tautz D: Hypervariability of simple sequences as a general source for polymorphic DNA. Nucl Acids Res 17: 6463–6471 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Morgante M, Olivieri AM: PCR-amplified microsatellites as markers in plant genetics. Plant J 3: 175–182 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Koreth J, O'Leary JJ, McGee JO: Microsatellites and PCR genome analysis. J Path 178: 239–248 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Castiglione S, Wand G, Damiani G, Bandi C, Bisoffi S, Sala F: RAPD fingerprints for identification and for taxonomic studies of elite poplar (Populus spp.) clones. Theor Appl Genet 87: 54–59 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Smulders MJM, Bredemeijer G, Rus-Kortekaas W, Arens P, Vosman B: Use of short microsatellites from database sequences to generate polymorphisms among Lycopersicon esculentum cultivars and accessions of other Lycopersicon species. Theor Appl Genet 97: 264–272 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Penner GA, Bush A, Wise R, Kim W, Domier L, Kasha K, Laroche A, Scoles G, Molner SJ, Fedak G: Reproducibility of random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis among laboratories. PCR Meth Appl 2: 341–345 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Skroch P, Nienhuis J: Impact of scoring error and reproducibility of RAPD data on RAPD based estimates of genetic distance. Theor Appl Genet 91: 1086–1091 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Lin J-J, Kuo J, Ma J, Saunders JA, Beard HS, Macdonald MH, Kenworthy W, Ude N, Matthews F: Identification of molecular markers in soybean comparing RFLP, RAPD and AFLP DNA mapping techniques. Plant Mol Biol Rep 14: 156–159 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Janssen P, Coopman R, Huys G, Swings J, Bleeker M, Vos P, Zabeau M, Kersters K: Evaluation of the DNA fingerprinting method AFLP as a new tool in bacterial taxonomy. Microbiology 142: 1881–1893 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Becker J, Vos P, Kuiper M, Salamini F, Heun M: Combined mapping of AFLP and RFLPmarkers in barley. Mol GenGenet 249: 65–73 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Huys G, Coopman R, Janssen P, Kersters K: High-resolution genotypic analysis of the genus Aeromonas by AFLP fingerprinting. Int J Syst Bact 46: 572–580 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Thomas MR, Cain P, Scott NS: DNA typing of grapevines: a universal methodology and database for describing cultivars and evaluating genetic distances. Plant Mol Biol 25: 939–949 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Powell W, Machray GC, Provan J: Polymorphism revealed by simple sequence repeats. Trends Plant Sci 1: 215–222 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Schwengel DA, Jedlicka AE, Nanthakamur EJ, Weber, JL, Levitt RC: Comparison of fluorescence-based semi-automated genotyping of multiple microsatellite lociwith autoradiographic techniques. Genomics 22: 46–54 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Bowers JE, Dangi GS, Vignani R, Meredith CP: Isolation and characterisation of new polymorphic simple sequence repeat loci in grape (Vitis vinifera L.) Genome 39: 628–633 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Weber JL: Informativeness of human (dC-dA)n(dG-dT)n polymorphisms. Genomics 7: 524–530 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Karp.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jones, C., Edwards, K., Castaglione, S. et al. Reproducibility testing of RAPD, AFLP and SSR markers in plants by a network of European laboratories. Molecular Breeding 3, 381–390 (1997).

Download citation

  • DNA markers
  • RAPD
  • AFLP
  • SSR
  • microsatellite
  • network
  • reproducibility