A number of PCR-based techniques can be used to detect polymorphisms in plants. For their wide-scale usage in germplasm characterisation and breeding it is important that these marker technologies can be exchanged between laboratories, which in turn requires that they can be standardised to yield reproducible results, so that direct collation and comparison of the data are possible. This article describes a network experiment involving several European laboratories, in which the reproducibility of three popular molecular marker techniques was examined: random-amplified fragment length polymorphism (RAPD), amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) and sequence-tagged microsatellites (SSR). For each technique, an optimal system was chosen, which had been standardised and routinely used by one laboratory. This system (genetic screening package) was distributed to different participating laboratories in the network and the results obtained compared with those of the original sender. Different experiences were gained in this exchange experiment with the different techniques. RAPDs proved difficult to reproduce. For AFLPs, a single-band difference was observed in one track, whilst SSR alleles were amplified by all laboratories, but small differences in their sizing were obtained.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Williams JGK, Kubelik AR, Livak KJ, Raflaski JA, Tingey SV: DNA polymorphism amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers. Nucl Acids Res 18: 6531–6535 (1990).
Welsh J, McClelland M: Fingerprinting genomes using PCR with arbitrary primers. Nucl Acids Res 18:7213–7218 (1990).
Büuscher N, Zyprian E, Blaich R: Identification of grapevine cultivars by DNA analyses: Pitfalls of random amplified polymorphic DNA techniques using 10 mer primers. Vitis 32: 187–188 (1993).
Devos KM, Gale MD: The use of random amplified polymorphic DNA markers in wheat. Theor Appl Genet 84: 567–572 (1992).
He Q, Viljanen MK, Mertsola J: Effects of thermocyclers and primers on the reproducibility of banding patterns in randomly amplified polymorphic DNAanalysis. Mol Cell Probes 8: 155–160 (1994).
MacPherson JM, Eckstein PE, Scoles GJ, Gajadhar AA: Variability of the random amplified polymorphic DNA assay among thermal cyclers, and effects of primer and DNA concentration. Mol Cell Probes 7: 293–299 (1993).
Meunier JR, Grimont PA: Factors affecting reproducibility of random amplified polymorphic DNA fingerprinting. Res Microbiol 144: 373–379 (1993).
Yu K, Pauls KP: Optimization of the PCR program for RAPD analysis. Nucl Acids Res 20: 2606 (1992).
Zabeau M, Vos P: Selective restriction fragment amplification: a general method for DNA fingerprinting. European Patent Application, publication EP 0534858-A1, No. 92402629.7 (1993).
Vos P, Hogers R, Bleeker M, Reijans M, van de Lee T, Hornes M, Frijters A, Pot J, Peleman J, Kuiper M, Zabeau M: AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucl Acids Res 23: 4407–4414 (1995).
Tautz D: Hypervariability of simple sequences as a general source for polymorphic DNA. Nucl Acids Res 17: 6463–6471 (1989).
Morgante M, Olivieri AM: PCR-amplified microsatellites as markers in plant genetics. Plant J 3: 175–182 (1993).
Koreth J, O'Leary JJ, McGee JO: Microsatellites and PCR genome analysis. J Path 178: 239–248 (1996).
Castiglione S, Wand G, Damiani G, Bandi C, Bisoffi S, Sala F: RAPD fingerprints for identification and for taxonomic studies of elite poplar (Populus spp.) clones. Theor Appl Genet 87: 54–59 (1993).
Smulders MJM, Bredemeijer G, Rus-Kortekaas W, Arens P, Vosman B: Use of short microsatellites from database sequences to generate polymorphisms among Lycopersicon esculentum cultivars and accessions of other Lycopersicon species. Theor Appl Genet 97: 264–272 (1997).
Penner GA, Bush A, Wise R, Kim W, Domier L, Kasha K, Laroche A, Scoles G, Molner SJ, Fedak G: Reproducibility of random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis among laboratories. PCR Meth Appl 2: 341–345 (1993).
Skroch P, Nienhuis J: Impact of scoring error and reproducibility of RAPD data on RAPD based estimates of genetic distance. Theor Appl Genet 91: 1086–1091 (1995).
Lin J-J, Kuo J, Ma J, Saunders JA, Beard HS, Macdonald MH, Kenworthy W, Ude N, Matthews F: Identification of molecular markers in soybean comparing RFLP, RAPD and AFLP DNA mapping techniques. Plant Mol Biol Rep 14: 156–159 (1996).
Janssen P, Coopman R, Huys G, Swings J, Bleeker M, Vos P, Zabeau M, Kersters K: Evaluation of the DNA fingerprinting method AFLP as a new tool in bacterial taxonomy. Microbiology 142: 1881–1893 (1996).
Becker J, Vos P, Kuiper M, Salamini F, Heun M: Combined mapping of AFLP and RFLPmarkers in barley. Mol GenGenet 249: 65–73 (1995).
Huys G, Coopman R, Janssen P, Kersters K: High-resolution genotypic analysis of the genus Aeromonas by AFLP fingerprinting. Int J Syst Bact 46: 572–580 (1996).
Thomas MR, Cain P, Scott NS: DNA typing of grapevines: a universal methodology and database for describing cultivars and evaluating genetic distances. Plant Mol Biol 25: 939–949 (1994).
Powell W, Machray GC, Provan J: Polymorphism revealed by simple sequence repeats. Trends Plant Sci 1: 215–222 (1996).
Schwengel DA, Jedlicka AE, Nanthakamur EJ, Weber, JL, Levitt RC: Comparison of fluorescence-based semi-automated genotyping of multiple microsatellite lociwith autoradiographic techniques. Genomics 22: 46–54 (1994).
Bowers JE, Dangi GS, Vignani R, Meredith CP: Isolation and characterisation of new polymorphic simple sequence repeat loci in grape (Vitis vinifera L.) Genome 39: 628–633 (1996).
Weber JL: Informativeness of human (dC-dA)n(dG-dT)n polymorphisms. Genomics 7: 524–530 (1990).
About this article
Cite this article
Jones, C., Edwards, K., Castaglione, S. et al. Reproducibility testing of RAPD, AFLP and SSR markers in plants by a network of European laboratories. Molecular Breeding 3, 381–390 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009612517139
- DNA markers