Abstract
A new, highly efficient pit-light trap is described and results of experiments on its efficacy that were carried out in various types of forests are presented. The Luminoc® insect trap is made of two parts: a 1-L collection container inserted into the ground and an upper container which houses a 6-V lantern battery and a circuit for electronic control of a 1.8-W miniature fluorescent tube. A cover is fixed under the upper container to prevent rainwater from entering the collection container. The pit-light trap caught significantly more specimens, species and families of Coleoptera than passive pitfall traps. Many species of common families, such as Carabidae, Cantharidae, Curculionidae, Elateridae, Pyrochroidae, Scarabaeidae, Silphidae and Tenebrionidae were mainly caught in pit-light traps. Several species of uncommon families such as Byrrhidae, Melandryidae, Scraptiidae, Stenotrachelidae and Throscidae were caught only in pit-light traps. The light source increases the sampling area of a trap to include many micro-habitats, which makes pit-light traps more efficient tools that provide less variable results than the passive pitfall traps. The use of only three pit-light traps allows the capture of three times more 'abundant and common' species than any number of passive pitfall traps could provide. Thus, the pit-light trap allows an easier and more accurate characterization of Coleoptera communities than the passive pitfall trap. Because of its high efficacy, the pit-light trap should be considered as a standard tool to study, monitor and inventory beetle diversity.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adis, J. (1979) Problems of interpreting arthropod sampling with pitfall traps. Zool. Anz. Jena 2O2, 177-84.
Benest, G. (1989a) The sampling of a carabid community. I-The behaviour of a carabid when facing the trap. Rev. Ecol. Biol. Sol. 26(2), 205-11.
Benest, G. (1989b) The sampling of a carabid community. II-Traps and trapping. Rev. Ecol. Biol. Sol. 26(4), 505-14.
BIOCOM. (1998) Luminocr insect trap-Instruction Manual DL & LC Model.
Butterfield, J., Luff, M.L., Baines, M. and Eyre, M.D. (1995) Carabid beetle communities as indicators of conservation potential in upland forests. For. Ecol. Manag. 79, 63-77.
Casteels, H. and de Clercq, R. (1988) Observations on weevil pests in nurseries. Med. Fac. Landbouww. Rijksuniv. Gent 53(3a), 1169-74.
Digweed, S.C., Currie, C.R., Carcamo, H.A. and Spence, J.R. (1995) Digging out the 'digging-in effect' of pitfall traps: influences of depletion and disturbance on catches of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Pedobiologia 39(6), 561-76.
Downie, N.M. and Arnett, R.H. (1996). The beetles of northeastern North America (2 volumes). Gainesville, Florida: The Sandhill Crane Press.
Greenslade, P.J.M. (1964) Pitfall trapping as a method for studying populations of Carabidae (Coleoptera). J. Anim. Ecol. 33, 301-10.
Heap, M.A. (1988). The pit-light, a newtrap for soil-dwelling insects. J. Aust. Entomol. Soc. 27, 239-40.
Hébert, C. and Jobin, L. (1995) Le piège Luminocr: un outil polyvalent pour l'étude de la biodiversité des insectes. Nat. Can. 119(2), 57-60.
Kim, K.C. (1993) Biodiversity, conservation and inventory: why insects matter. Biodivers. Conserv. 2191-214.
Kremen, C., Colwell, R.K., Erwin, T.L., Murphy, D.D., Noss, R.F. and Sanjayan, M.A. (1993) Terrestrial arthropod assemblages: their use in conservation planning. Conserv. Biol. 7, 796-808.
Jobin, L.J. and Coulombe, C. (1988) The Multi-Pherr insect trap. Forestry Canada, Quebec Region, Inf. Leafl. CFL-24E.
Jobin, L. and Coulombe, C. (1992) The Luminocr insect trap. Forestry Canada, Quebec Region, Inf. Leafl. LFC-26.
Lawrence, J.F. and Newton, Jr, A.F. (1995). Families and subfamilies of Coleoptera (with selected genera, notes, references and data on family-group names). In: Biology, phylogeny, and classification of Coleoptera: Papers Celebrating the 80th Birthday of Roy A. Crowson (J. Pakaluk and S.A. Slipinski, eds). pp. 779-1006. Muzeum i Instytut Zoologii PAN, Warszawa.
Levesque, C., Dubé, J. and Pilon, J.-G. (1976) Inventaire et étude biocénotique des Coléoptères Carabidae de biotopes forestiers des Laurentides (Québec). Nat. Can. 103, 569-82.
Luff, M.L. (1968) Some effects of formalin on the numbers of Coleoptera caught in pitfall traps. Entomol. Mon. Mag. 104, 115-16.
Luff, M.L. (1975) Some features affecting the efficiency of pitfall traps. Oecologia 19, 345-57.
Maier, C.T. (1983) Use of trap-boards for detecting adults of the black vine weevil, Otiorhynchus sulcatus (Fabricius) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Proc. Entomol. Soc. Wash. 85(2): 374-6.
Martel, J., Mauffette, Y. and Tousignant, S. (1991) Secondary effects of canopy dieback: the epigeal carabid fauna in Québec Appalachian maple forests. Can. Entomol. 123, 851-59.
Martin, J.E.H. (1983) Les insectes et arachnides du Canada-Récolte, préparation et conservation des insectes, des acariens et des araignées. Institut de recherche biosystématique, Agriculture Canada, Publ. 1643.
McCune, B. and Mefford, M.J. (1997) PC-ORD. Multivariate analysis of ecological data, Version 3.0. MjM software design, Gleneden Beach, Oregon, USA.
Miyazaki, R.D. and Coutinho Dutra, R.R. (1995) Familias de Coleoptera capturadas com armadilha luminosa em oito localidades do Parana, Brasil. Rev. Bras. Zool. 12(2), 321-32.
Morrill, W.L., Lester, D.G. and Wrona, A.E. (1990) Factors affecting efficacy of pitfall traps for beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae and Tenebrionidae). J. Entomol. Sci. 25(2), 284-93.
Niemelä, J., Halme, E. and Haila,Y. (1990) Balancing sampling effort in pitfall trapping of carabid beetles. Entomol. Fenn. 1, 234-8.
Poole, R.W. and Gentili, P. (1996). Nomina Insecta Nearctica-A check list of the insects of North America. Volume I: Coleoptera, Strepsiptera. Entomological Information Services, Rockville, MD, USA.
Poprawski, T.J. and Yule, W.N. (1992) Field assays to determine attractancy of natural and synthetic lures to Phyllophaga anxia (LeConte) (Col., Scarabaeidae). J. Appl. Entomol. 114, 305-14.
Reeves, R.M., Dunn, G.A. and Jennings, D.T. (1983) Carabid beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) associated with the spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Can. Entomol. 115, 453-72.
Rykken, J.J., Capen, D.E. and Mahabir, S.P. (1997) Ground beetles as indicators of land type diversity in the Green Mountains of Vermont. Conserv. Biol 11, 522-30.
SAS Institute Inc. (1989) SAS/STAT User's Guide, Version B, Fourth Edition, Volumes 1 and 2, Cary, NC.
Southwood, T.R.E. (1978) Ecological methods, with particular reference to the study of insect populations, 2nd edn, London and New York: Chapman and Hall.
Spence, J.R. and Niemelä, J.K. (1994) Sampling carabid assemblages with pitfall traps: the madness and the method. Can. Entomol. 126, 881-94.
Terrell-Nield, C. (1990) Is it possible to age woodlands on the basis of their carabid beetle diversity? Entomologist 109(3), 136-45.
Weeks, Jr, R.D. and McIntyre, N.E. (1997) A comparison of live versus kill pitfall trapping techniques using various killing agents. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 82, 267-73.
White, R.E. (1983) A field guide to the beetles of North America. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hébert, C., Jobin, L., Fréchette, M. et al. An Efficient Pit-light Trap to Study Beetle Diversity. Journal of Insect Conservation 4, 189–200 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009611501133
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009611501133