Abstract
Preliminary analysis based on an aggregate model of global carbon emissions suggests that constraining emissions to the levels that would be imposed by compliance with the results of the Kyoto negotiations can increase the discounted cost of ultimately limiting atmospheric concentrations. Kyoto targets can be either too restrictive or too permissive depending upon the (currently unknown) trajectory of carbon emissions over the near- to medium-term and the (as yet unspecified) concentration target that frames long-term policy. The discounted cost of meeting low concentration targets like 450 ppmv. is diminished by allowing large sinks and/or by imposing more restrictive near-term emissions benchmarks (even if only Annex B countries are bound by the Kyoto accord). Conversely, the cost of achieving high concentration targets like 650 ppmv. is diminished by disallowing sinks and/or by imposing less restrictive emissions benchmarks. Intermediate concentration targets like 550 ppmv. look like high concentration targets (favoring no sinks and expanded near-term emissions) along low emissions paths; but they look like low concentration targets (favoring the opposite) along high emissions paths. Emissions trajectories that lie above the median, but not excessively so, represent cases for which adjustments in the Kyoto emissions benchmarks and/or negotiated allowances for sinks have the smallest effect on the cost of mitigation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arrow, K.J., Cline, W.R., Maler, K.-G., Munasinghe, M., Squitieri, R. and Stiglitz, J.E.: 1995, ‘Intertemporal Equity, Discounting, and Economic Efficiency’ in J.P. Bruce, H. Lee and E.F. Haites (eds.), Climate Change 1995 - Economic and Social Dimensions of Climate Change, Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press, pp. 125–144.
Hammit, J.K., Lempert, R.J. and Schlesinger, M.E.: 1992, ‘A sequential-decision strategy for abating climate change’. Nature 357, 315–318.
Heal, G.: 1997, ‘Discounting and climate change; an editorial comment’. Climatic Change 37, 335–343.
Koopmans, T.J.: 1967, ‘Objectives, constraints and outcomes in optimal growth models’. Econometrica 35, 1–15.
Leggett, J.A., Pepper, W.J. and Swart, R.J.: 1992, ‘Emissions scenarios for IPCC - An update’ in J.T. Houghton et al. (eds.), Climate Change 1995, Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press, pp. 69–95.
Lempert, R.J., Schlesinger, M.E. and Bankes, S.C.: 1996, ‘When we don't know the costs or the benefits: Adaptive strategies for abating climate change’. Climate Change 33, 235–374.
Maier-Reimer, E. and Hasselmann, K.: 1987, ‘Climate dynamics’. Climate Dynamics 2, 63–90.
Manne, A. and Richels, R.: 1997, ‘On stabilizing CO2 concentrations - Cost-effective emission reduction strategies’. Environmental Modeling and Assessment 2, 251–266.
Morita, T., Matsuoka, Y., Penna, I. and Kainuma, M.: 1994, Global carbon dioxide emission scenarios and their basic assumptions - 1994 Survey, Center for Global Environmental Research, National Institute for Environmental Studies, Japan.
Nordhaus, W.D.: 1994, Managing the Global Commons, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
Nordhaus, W.D. and Yohe, G.W.: 1983, ‘Future carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuels’ in Changing Climate, Washington, D.C., National Academy Press.
Schellnhuber, H.J. and Yohe, G.W.: 1997, ‘Comprehending the economic and social dimensions of climate change by integrated assessment’ presented at the Conference on the World Climate Research Programme, Geneva, August 27.
Schlesinger, M.E. and Yohe, G.W.: 1998, ‘Sea-level change: The expected economic cost of protection or abandonment in the United States’, Climatic Change 38, 437–472.
Schneider, S.H. and Goulder, L.: 1997, ‘Achieving carbon dioxide concentration targets. What should be done now?’ Nature 389, 13–14.
Weyant, J.: 1996, ‘Models for second round scenario results’, Energy Modeling Forum mimeo, Stanford University.
Weyant, J.: 1998a, ‘Post-Kyoto EMF scenarios - Round #1’, Energy Modeling Forum mimeo, Stanford University.
Weyant, J.: 1998b, ‘Models for’, Energy Modeling Forum mimeo, Stanford University.
Wigley, T.M.L.: 1998, ‘The Kyoto Protocol: CO2, CH4 and climate implications’. Geophysical Research Letters 25, 2285–2288.
Wigley, T.M.L., Richels, R. and Edmonds, J.A.: 1996, ‘Economic and environmental choices in the stabilization of atmospheric CO2 concentrations’. Nature 239, 240–243.
Yohe, G.W.: 1991, ‘Toward a general methodology for selecting “interesting” scenarios’. Climate Research 1, 169–177.
Yohe, G.W. and Wallace, R.: 1996, ‘Near-term mitigation policy for global change under uncertainty: Minimizing the expected cost of meeting unknown concentration thresholds’. Environmental Modeling and Assessment 1, 47–57.
Yohe, G.W., Milinowski, T. and Yohe, M.E.: 1998, ‘Fixing global carbon emissions: Choosing the best target year’. Energy Policy 26, 219–231.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yohe, G., Jacobsen, M. Meeting Concentration Targets in the Post-Kyoto World: Does Kyoto Further a Least Cost Strategy?. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 4, 1–23 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009609716388
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009609716388