Advertisement

Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics

, Volume 12, Issue 3, pp 279–303 | Cite as

Environmental Risks of Pesticides Versus Genetic Engineering for Agricultural Pest Control

  • Maurizio G. Paoletti
  • David Pimentel
Article

Abstract

Despite the application of 2.5 million tons ofpesticides worldwide, more than 40% of all potentialfood production is lost to insect, weed, and plantpathogen pests prior to harvest. After harvest, anadditional 20% of food is lost to another group ofpests. The use of pesticides for pest control resultsin an estimated 26 million human poisonings, with220,000 fatalities, annually worldwide. In the UnitedStates, the environmental and public health costs forthe recommended use of pesticides total approximately$9 billion/yr. Thus, there is a need for alternativenon-chemical pest controls, and genetic engineering(biotechnology) might help with this need. Diseaseand insect pest resistance to various pests has beenslowly bred into crops for the past 12,000 years;current techniques in biotechnology now offeropportunities to further and more rapidly improve thenon-chemical control of disease and insect pests ofcrops. However, relying on a single factor, like theBacillus thuringiensis toxin that has beeninserted into corn and a few other crops for insectcontrol, leads to various environmental problems,including insect resistance and, in some cases, athreat to beneficial biological control insects andendangered insect species. A major environmental andeconomic cost associated with genetic engineeringapplications in agriculture relates to the use ofherbicide resistant crops (HRC). In general, HRCtechnology results in increased herbicide use but noincrease in crop yields. The heavy use of herbicidesin HRC technology pollutes the environment and canlead to weed control costs for farmers that may be2-fold greater than standard weed control costs. Therefore, pest control with both pesticides andbiotechnology can be improved for effective, safe,economical pest control.

environment genetic engineering biotechnology pesticides agriculture pest control risks 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Abd Alla, M. H. and S. A. Omar, “Herbicides Effects on Nodulation, Growth, and Nitrogen yield of faba bean Introduced by Indigenous Rhizobium Leguminosarum,” Zentralblatt fur Mikrobiologie 148(8) (1993), 593-597.Google Scholar
  2. Alexander, M., “Ecological Consequences of Reducing the Uncertainties,” Issues in Science and Technology 1(3) (1985), 57-68.Google Scholar
  3. Al Khatib, K., R. Parker, and E. P. Fuerst, “Sweet Cherry Response to Simulated Drift from Selected Herbicides,” Proceedings Western Society of Weed Society, Vol. 45 (Salt Lake City, Utah, 1992), pp. 2-27.Google Scholar
  4. Altieri, M. A., “The Environmental Risks of Transgenic Crops: An Agroecological Assessment,” Fifth Annual ESSD Conference Proceedings (World Bank, Washington DC, 1998).Google Scholar
  5. Bartlett, A. C., “Resistance of the Pink Bollworm to BT Transgenic Cotton,” in D. A. Richter and J. Amour (eds.), Proceedings Beltwide Cotton Conference, National Cotton Council of America (National Cotton Council of America, Memphis, TN, 1995), p. 766.Google Scholar
  6. Benbrook, C., Evidence of the Magnitude and Consequences of the Roundup Ready Soybean Yield Drag from University-based Varietal Trials in 1998 (Ag BioTech InfoNet Technical Paper Number 1, July 13, 1999), http://www.biotech-info.net/ RR_yield_drag_98.pdfGoogle Scholar
  7. Benedict, J. H., D. R. Ring, E. S. Sachs, D. W. Altman, R. R. DeSpain, T. B. Stone, and J. R. Sims, “Influence of Transgenic BT Cottons on Tobacco Budworm and Bollworm Behavior Survival, and Plant Injury,” in J. Herber and D. A. Richter (eds.), Proceedings Beltwide Cotton Council (National Cotton Council, Memphis, TN, 1992), pp. 891-895.Google Scholar
  8. Berlan J. P. and R. C. Lewontin, “La menace du complexe genetico-industriel,” Le Monde Diplomatique (22 Dec., 1998).Google Scholar
  9. Blew, J. H., “Breeding Bird Census 92 Conventional Cash Crops Farm,” Journal of Field Ornithology 61(suppl.) (1990), 80-81.Google Scholar
  10. BSTID (Board on Science and Technology for International Development), Lost Crops of Africa, Vol. 1 (National Academic Press, Washington DC, 1996), pp. 1-383.Google Scholar
  11. Bommineni, V. R., P. P. Jauhar, and T. S. Peterson, “Transgenic Durum Wheat by Microprojectile Bombardment of Isolated Scutella,” Journal of Heredity 88(6) (1997), 474-481.Google Scholar
  12. Boudry, P., K. Broomberg, P. Saumitou-Laprade, M. Morchen, J. Cuegen, and H. Van Dijk, “Gene Escape in Transgenic Sugar Beet: What Can be Learned from Molecular Studies of Weed Beet Populations?” Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on the Biosafety Results of Field Tests of Genetically-Modified Plants and Microorganisms, Monterey, California, November 13-16 (The University of California, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Oakland, CA, 1994), pp. 75-83.Google Scholar
  13. Boutin, V., G. Pannenbecker, W. Ecke, G. Schewe, P. Saumitou-Laprade, R. Jean, P. Vernet, and G. Michealis, “Cytoplasmic Male Sterility and Nuclear Restorer Genes in a Natural Population of Beta Maritima: Genetical and Molecular Aspects,” Theor. Appl. Genet. 73 (1987), 625-629.Google Scholar
  14. Brown, J. and A. P. Brown, “Gene Transfer Between Canola (Brassica napus and B. campestris) and Related Weed Species,” Annals of Applied Biology 129(3) (1996), 513-522.Google Scholar
  15. Buhl, K. J., S. J. Hamilton, and J. C. Schmulbach, “Chronic Toxicity of Bromoxynil Formulation Buctril to Daphnia Magna Exposed Continuously and Intermittently,” Archives Env. Cont. And Toxicology 25(2) (1993), 152-159.Google Scholar
  16. Chen, C., “Flavoring Against Fowl,” Cornell Countryman (April/May, 1995), 24.Google Scholar
  17. Cox, C., “Glyphosate, Part 1: Toxicology,” Journal of Pesticide Reform 15(3) (1995a), 14-20.Google Scholar
  18. Cox, C., “Glyphosate, Part 2: Toxicology,” Journal of Pesticide Reform 15(4) (1995b), 14-20.Google Scholar
  19. Cox, C., “Herbicide Factsheet: Glufosinate,” Journal of Pesticide Reform 16(4) (1996), 15-19.Google Scholar
  20. Croft, B. A., Arthropod Biological Control Agents and Pesticides (J. Wiley & Sons, New York, 1990).Google Scholar
  21. Cuguen, B., R. Wattier, L. Saumitou, D. Forcioli, M. Morchen, H. Van Dilk, and P. Vernet, “Gynodiecy and Mitochondrial DNA Polymorphism in Natural Populations of Beta vulgaris ssp. maritima,” Geneti. Sci. Evol. 26 (1994), 87-101.Google Scholar
  22. de Zoeten, G. A., “Risk Assessment: DoWe Let History Repeat Itself,” Phytopathology 81 (1991), 585-586.Google Scholar
  23. Dobbins, J., “Resources Damage Assessment of the T/V Puerto Rican Oil Spill Incident,” Report to NOAA (Sanctuary Program Division, Washington, DC, 1986).Google Scholar
  24. Ecobichon, D. J., J. E. Davies, J. Doull, M. Ehrlich, R. Joy, D. McMillan, R. MacPhail, L. W. Reiter, W. Slikker, and H. Tilson, “Neurotoxic Effects of Pesticides,” in C. F. Wilkinson and S. R. Baker (eds.), The Effect of Pesticides on Human Health (Princeton Scientific, Princeton, NJ, 1990), pp. 131-199.Google Scholar
  25. Elton, C. S., The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants (Methuen, London, 1958).Google Scholar
  26. El-Zarkouny, S. A., M. A. Ayoub, M. H. G. Ishak, F. D. El Nouty, G. A. Hassan, R. Abo El Ezz Zahraa, and M. H. Salem, “Effect of Carbosulfan Pesticide and Selenium on Some Semen Characteristics and Serum Testosterone in Male Rabbits,” International Journal of Environmental Health Research 9(2) (1999), 117-124.Google Scholar
  27. EPA, Carbofuran: A Special Review Technical Support Document (US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Pesticides and Toxic Substances, Washington, DC, 1989).Google Scholar
  28. Fernandez-Cuartero, B., J. Burgyan, M. A. Aranda, K. Salanki, E. Moriones, and F. Garcia-Arenal, “Increase of the Relative Fitness of a Plant Virus RNA Associated with Its Recombinant Nature,” Virology 203 (1994), 373-377.Google Scholar
  29. Fisch, H. and E. T. Goluboff, “Geographic Variations in Sperm Counts: A Potential Cause of Bias in Studies of Sperm Quality,” Fertility and Sterility 65(5) (1996), 1044-1046.Google Scholar
  30. Flickinger, E. L., K. A. King, W. F. Stout, and M. M. Mohn, “Wildlife Hazards from Furadan 3G Application to Rice in Texas,” Journal of Wildlife Management 44 (1980), 190-197.Google Scholar
  31. Flickinger, E. L., G. Juenger, T. J. Roffe, M. R. Smith, and R. J. Irwin, “Poisoning of Canada Geese in Texas by Parathion Sprayed for Control of Russian Wheat Aphid,” Journal of Wildlife Diseases 27 (1991), 265-268.Google Scholar
  32. Forschler, R. T., J. N. All, and W. A. Gardner, “Steinermafeltiae Activity and Infectivity in Response to Herbicide Exposure in Aqueous and Soil Environments,” J. Invertebrate Pathology 55(3) (1990), 375-379.Google Scholar
  33. Fox, J. L., “Farmers Say Monsanto' Engineered Cotton Drops Bolls,” Nature BioTechnology15 (1997), 1233.Google Scholar
  34. Gene Exchange (Union of Concerned Scientists, Washington, DC, Fall 1997), pp. 6-8.Google Scholar
  35. Gene Exchange (UCS [Union of Concerned Scientists], Summer 1998), www.ucsusa.orgGoogle Scholar
  36. Goldburg, R., J. Rissler, H. Shand, and C. Hassebrook, Biotechnology' Bitter Harvest. A Report of the Biotechnology Working Group (1990).Google Scholar
  37. Goldburg, R., “Pause at the Amber Light,” Ceres 153 (1995), 21-26.Google Scholar
  38. Goldburg, R. J. and G. Tjaden, “Are B.T.K. Plants Really Safe to Eat?” BioTechnology 8 (1990), 1011-1015.Google Scholar
  39. Gonsalves, D., M. Fuchs, F. Klas, and P. Tennant, “Field Assessment of RisksWhen Using Transgenic Papayas, Cucurbits, and Tomatoes Expressing Viral Coat Protein Genes,” Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on the Biosafety Results of Field Tests of Genetically-Modified Plants and Microorganisms, Monterey, California, November 13-16 (The University of California, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Oakland, CA, 1994), pp. 117-127.Google Scholar
  40. Greene, A. E. and R. F. Allison, “Recombination Between Viral RNA and Transgenic Plant Transcript,” Science 263 (1994), 1423-1425.Google Scholar
  41. Greef, W. De, R. Delon, M. de Block, J. Leemans, and J. Botterman, “Evaluation of Herbicide Resistance in Transgenic Crops under Field Conditions,” Bio/Technology 7(1) (1989), 61-64.Google Scholar
  42. Gressel J., Genetically-Engineered Herbicide Resistant Crop - A Moral Imperative for World Food Production (Agro-Food Industry. Hi Tech, Jonpaper, 1992), p. 15.Google Scholar
  43. Hayenga, M. L., C. Thompson, C. Chase, and S. Kaaria, “Economic and Environmental Implications of Herbicide-Tolerant Corn and Processing Tomatoes,” Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 47 (1992), 411-417.Google Scholar
  44. Hammond, B. G., J. L. Vicini, G. F. Hartnell, M.W. Naylor, C. D. Knight, E. H. Robinson, R. L. Fuchs, and S. R. Padgette, “The Feeding Value of Soybeans Fed to Rats, Chickens, Catfish, and Dairy Cattle Is Not Altered by Genetic Incorporation of Glyphosphate Tolerance,” Journal of Nutrition 126(3) (1996), 717-727.Google Scholar
  45. Hammond B. G. and R. L. Fuchs, “Safety Evaluation for New Varieties of Food Crops Developed Through Biotechnology,” in J. A. Thomas (ed.), Biotechnology and Safety Assessment (Taylor & Francis, Washington DC, 1997), pp. 61-79.Google Scholar
  46. Head, R. B., “Cotton Insect Losses,” Proceedings of the National Cotton Council of America, 1991-1993, Vol. 2 (Memphis, TN, 1991), pp. 655-660.Google Scholar
  47. Heath, M. C., B. Valent, R. J. Howard, and F. G. Chumley, “Correlations Between Cytological Detected Plant-Fungal Interactions and Pathogenicity of Magnaporthe Grisea Toward Weeping Lovegrass,” Phytopathology 80(12) (1990), 1382-1386.Google Scholar
  48. Henry, C. J., K. F. Higgins, and K. J. Buhl, “Acute Toxicity and Hazard Assessment of Rodeo, Spreader, and Chem-Trol to Aquatic Invertebrates,” Activities of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 27(3) (1994), 392-399.Google Scholar
  49. Hilbeck, A., M. Baumgartner, M. Fried-Padrout, and F. Bigler, “Effects of Transgenic Bacillus Thuringiensis Corn-Fed Prey on Mortality and Development time of immature Chrysoperla carnea,” Environmental Entomology 27 (1998), 480-487.Google Scholar
  50. Hull, R., “The Use and Misuse of Viruses in Cloning and Expression in Plants,” in R. S. S. Frazer (ed.), Recognition and Response in Plant-Virus Interactions, NATO ASI, Vol.H41 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin and Heidelberg, 1990), pp. 443-457.Google Scholar
  51. James C., “Global Review of Commercialized Transgenic Crops,” ISAAA Briefs (Cornell University, 8/1998).Google Scholar
  52. James, P. C., “Internalizing Externalities: Granular Carbofuran Use on Rapeseed in Canada,” Ecology and Economics 13 (1995), 181-184.Google Scholar
  53. Jepson, P. C., B. C. Croft, and G. E. Pratt, “Test Systems to Determine the Ecological Risks Posed by Toxin Release from Bacillus thuringiensis Genes in Crop Plants,” Molecular Ecology 3 (1994), 81-89.Google Scholar
  54. Joel, D., M. Kleifeld, Y. Losner-Goshen, G. Hezlinger, and J. Gessler, “Transgenic Crops Against Parasites,” Nature 374 (1995), 220-221.Google Scholar
  55. Koyama, K., K. Koyama, and K. Goto, “Cardiovascular Effects of a Herbicide Containing Glufosinate and a Surfectant: In Vitro and In Vivo Analyses in Rats,” Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology 145(2) (1997), 409-414.Google Scholar
  56. Krattinger, A. F. and A. Rosemarin, Biosafety for Sustainable Agriculture: Sharing Biotechnology Regulatory Experiences of the Western Hemisphere (ISAAA, Ithaca, NY, 1994).Google Scholar
  57. Krimsky, S. and R. P. Wrubel, Agricultural Biotechnology and the Environment (Univ. Illinois Press, Urbana, IL, 1996), 294 pp.Google Scholar
  58. LeBaron H. M. and J. E. McFarland, “Resistance to Herbicides,” Chemtech 20 (1990), 508-511.Google Scholar
  59. Lindgren, P. B., N. J. Panopoulos, B. J. Staskawicz, and D. Dahlbeck, “Genes Required for Pathogenicity and Hypersensitivity Are Conserved and Interchangeable Among Pathovars of Peudomanas syringae,” Molecular & General Genetics 211(3) (1988), 499-506.Google Scholar
  60. Lindow, S. E., “Methods of Preventing Frost Injury Caused by Epiphytic Ice-Nucleation-Active Bacteria,” Plant Disease 67 (1983), 327-333.Google Scholar
  61. Losey, J., L. S. Rayor, and M. E. Carter, “Transgenic Pollen Harms Monarch Larvae,” Nature 399 (1999), 214.Google Scholar
  62. Mastrota, F. N. and J. A. Mench, “Evaluation of Taste Repellents with Northern Bobwhites for Deterring Ingestion of Granular Pesticides,” Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 14 (1995), 631-638.Google Scholar
  63. McCullum C., Pimentel D., and M. G. Paoletti, “Genetic Engineering in Agriculture and the Environment: Risks and Benefits,” in J.A. Thomas (ed.), Biotechnology and Safety Assessment (Taylor & Francis, Washington, DC, 1998), pp. 177-217.Google Scholar
  64. Mikkelsen, T. R., B. Anderson, and R. B. Jorgensen, “The Risk of Crop Transgene Spread,” Nature 380 (1996), 31.Google Scholar
  65. Miller, J. J., B. C., Hill, C. Chang, and C.W. Lindwall, “Canadian Journal of Soil,” Science 75(3) (1995), 349-356.Google Scholar
  66. Mineau, P., “AvianMortality in Agroecosystems. I. The Case Against Granular Insecticides in Canada,” in M. P. Greaves, B. D. Smith, and P. W. Greig-smith (eds.), Field Methods for the Study of Environmental Effects of Pesticides. London: British Crop Protection Council, Monograph 40, Thornton Heath, London, 1988), pp. 3-12.Google Scholar
  67. Mohamed, A.-I., G.-A. Nair, H.-H. Kassem, and M.-Nuruzzaman, “Impacts of Pesticides on the Survival and Body Mass of the Earthworm Aporrectodea caliginosa (Annelida: Oligochaeta),” Acta Zoologica Fennicica 196 (1995), 344-347.Google Scholar
  68. Moff, A. S., “Toting up the Early Harvest of Transgenic Plants,” Science 282 (1998), 2176-2178.Google Scholar
  69. NAS, Introduction of Recombinant DNA-Engineered Organisms into the Environment: Key Issues (National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC, 1987).Google Scholar
  70. Oerke, E. C., H. W. Dehne, F. Schonbeck, and A. Weber, Crop Production and Crop Protection: Estimated Losses in Major Food and Cash Crops (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1994).Google Scholar
  71. Olsen, G. W., K. M. Bodner, J. M. Ramlow, C. E. Ross, and L. I. Lipshultz, “Have Sperm Counts been Reduced 50 Percent in 50 Years? A Statistical Model Revisited', Fertility and Sterility 63(4), 887-893.Google Scholar
  72. Paoletti, M. G. and D. Pimentel, “The Environmental and Economic Costs of Herbicide Resistance and Host-Plant Resistance and Host-Plant Resistance to Plant Pathogens and Insects,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 50 (1995), 9-23.Google Scholar
  73. Paoletti, M. G. and D. Pimentel, “Genetic Engineering in Agriculture and the Environment,” BioScience 46(9) (1996), 665-673.Google Scholar
  74. Palukaitis, P., “Virus-Mediated Genetic Transfer in Plants,” in M. Levin and H. Strauss (eds.), Risk Assessment in Genetic Engineering (McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 1991), pp. 140-162.Google Scholar
  75. Parga V. M. and F. X. Flores, “Variedades Mexicanas de Papa en la Produccion de Alimentos Preservando el Ambiente,” in CONPAPA. Memorias del VI Congreso Nacional de Productores de Papa (Confederacion Nacional de productores de Papa, Saltillo, Mexico, 1995), pp. 65-69.Google Scholar
  76. Person, C., “Gene-for-Gene Relationships in Host-Parasite Systems,” Canadian Journal of Botany 37 (1959), 1101-1130.Google Scholar
  77. Pimentel, D., “Habitat Factors in New Pest Invasions,” in K. C. Kim and B. A. McPheron (eds.), Evolution of Insects - Patterns of Variation (J. Wiley & Sons, New York, 1993).Google Scholar
  78. Pimentel, D., Techniques for Reducing Pesticide Use. Economic and Environmental Benefits (J. Wiley & Sons, New York, 1997).Google Scholar
  79. Pimentel, D. and H. Lehman (eds.), The Pesticide Question: Environment, Economics, and Ethics (Chapman & Hall, New York, 1993).Google Scholar
  80. Pimentel, D. and M. S. Ali, “An Economic and Environmental Assessment of Herbicide-Resistant and Insect/Pest Resistant Crops,” Indian Journal of Applied Economics 7(2) (1998), 241-252.Google Scholar
  81. Pimentel, D. and A. Greiner, “Environmental and Socio-Economic Costs of Pesticide Use,” in D. Pimentel (ed.), Techniques for Reducing Pesticide Use: Environmental and Economic Benefits (J. Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK, 1997), pp. 51-78.Google Scholar
  82. Pimentel, D. and K. Hart, “Ethical, Environmental, and Public Health Implications of Pesticide Use,” Chapter in New Perspectives in Bioethics (Johns Hopkins University Press, 1999), in press.Google Scholar
  83. Pimentel, D., A. Greiner, and T. Bashore, “Economic and Environmental Costs of Pesticide Use,” in J. Rose (ed.), Environmental Toxicology: Current Developments (Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1998), pp. 121-150.Google Scholar
  84. Pimentel, D., H. Acquay, M. Biltonen, P. Rice, M. Silva, J. Nelson, V. Lipner, S. Giordano, A. Horowitz, and M. D'Amore, “Assessment of Environmental and Economic Impacts of Pesticide Use,” in D. Pimentel and H. Lehman (eds.), The Pesticide Question: Environment, Economics, and Ethics (Chapman & Hall, New York, 1993), pp. 47-83.Google Scholar
  85. Quaim, M., “Transgenic Virus Resistant Potatoes in Mexico: Potential Socioeconomic Implications of North-South Biotechnology Transfer” ISAAA Briefs (Cornell University, 7/1998).Google Scholar
  86. Reanova, V., V. Tuma, and K. Ondokova, “Effect of the Herbicide Roundup on Earthworms of the Family Lumbricidae in the Mountainous Meadow Ecosystems,” Zootechnicka Rada, Ceske Budejovice 13(2) (1996), 63-70.Google Scholar
  87. Rice, M. E. and C. D. Pilcher, “Potential Benefits and Limitations of Transgenic Bt Corn for management of the European Corn Borer (Lepidoptera: Crambidae),” American Entomologist (Summer 1998), 75-78.Google Scholar
  88. Rissler, J. and M. Mellon, Perils Amidst the Promise: Ecological Risks of Transgenic Crops in a Global Market (Union for Concerned Scientists, Cambridg, MA, 1993).Google Scholar
  89. Rogers, H. J. and H. C. Parkes, “Transgenic Plants and the Environment,” J. Exp. Bot. 46 (1995), 467-488.Google Scholar
  90. Roush, R. T. and J. A. McKenzie, “Ecological Genetics of Insecticide and Acaride Resistance,” Annu. Rev. Entomol. 32 (1987), 361-380.Google Scholar
  91. Samsoe-Peterson, L., “Effects of 67 Herbicides and Plant Growth Regulators on the Rove Beetle Aleochara bilineata (Col. Staphylinidae) in the Laboratory,” Entomophaga 40 (1995), 95-104.Google Scholar
  92. Santoni, S. and A. Berville, “Characterization of the Nuclear Ribosomal DNA Units and Phylogeny of Beta L. Wild Forms and Cultivated Beets,” Theor. Appl. Genet. 83 (1992), 533-542.Google Scholar
  93. Smith, B. D., The Emergence of Agriculture (Scientific American Library, Washington, DC, 1995).Google Scholar
  94. Smith, C. M., Plant Resistance to Insects. A Fundamental Approach (J. Wiley & Sons, New York, 1989).Google Scholar
  95. Smith, J. R. and S. A. Leong, “Mapping of a Magnaporthe grisea Locus Affecting Rice (Orysa sativa) Cultivar Specificity,” Theoretical and Applied Genetics 88(8) (1994), 901-908.Google Scholar
  96. Springett, J. A. and R. A. J. Gray, “Effect of Repeated Low Doses of Biocides on the Earthworm Apporectodea caliginosa in Laboratory Culture,” Soil Biology and Biochemistry24(12) (1992), 1739-1744.Google Scholar
  97. Steffey, K. L., “Crops, Genetic Technology, and Insect Management: Let' Talk,” American Entomologist 41(4) (1995), 205-206.Google Scholar
  98. Stone, W. B. and P. B. Gradoni, “Wildlife Mortality Related to the Use of the Pesticide Diazonin,” Northeastern Environmental Science 4 (1985), 30-38.Google Scholar
  99. Strizhov, N., M. Keller, J. Mathur, Z. Konz-Lalman, D. Bosch, E. Prudovsky, J. Schell, B. Sneh, C. Koncz, and A. Zilberstein, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences93(26) (1996), 15012-15017.Google Scholar
  100. Swan, S. H., E. P. Elkin, and L. Fenster, “Have Sperm Densities Declined? A Re-Analysis of Global Trend Data,” Environmental Health Perspectives 105(11) (1997), 1228-1232.Google Scholar
  101. Tabashnik, B. E., “Resistance Risk Management: Realized Heritability of Resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis in Diamond Back Moth (Lepidoptera: Pluetellidae), Tobacco Budworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), and Colorado Potato Beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae),” Journal of Economic Entomology 85 (1992), 1551-1559.Google Scholar
  102. Tepfer, M., “Viral Genes and Transgenic Plants,” Bio/Technology 11 (1993), 1125-1129.Google Scholar
  103. Tepfer, M., F. Vilaine, M. Carneiro, V. Pautot, C. Charbonnier, M. Rossignol, G. Vansuyt, E. Prinsen, H. Van-Onckelen, V. Legue, G. Perbal, C. Besnard, M. Noin, A. Guivarc'h, and D. Chriqui, “Physiological and Morphological Consequences of Expression of the rolA Gene in Transgenic Tobacco Plants,” Acta Botanica Gallica 140(6), 685-691Google Scholar
  104. Tinney, R. T., The Oil Drilling Prohibitions at the Channel Islands and Pt. Reyes-Fallallon Island National Marine Sanctuaries: Some Costs and Benefits (Report to Center for Environmental Educations, Washington, DC, 1982).Google Scholar
  105. UNEP, Global Environmental Outlook (United Nation Environmental Programme, Nairobi, Kenya, 1997).Google Scholar
  106. USFWS, 1985 Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife Associated Recreation. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, DC, 1988).Google Scholar
  107. Verderio, A., M. Bressan, M. Bertolini, S. Pino, G. Mazzinelli, and G. Sartori, “Risultati delle varieti transgeniche di mais resistenti a piralide o tolleranti a glufosinateammonio,” L'Informatore Agrario 12(98) (1998), 61-70.Google Scholar
  108. Waite, D. T., R. Grover, N. D. Westcott, D. G. Irvine, L. A. Kerr, and H. Sommerstad, “Atmospheric Deposition of Pesticides in a Small Southern Saskatchewan Watershed,” Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 14(7) (1995), 1171-1175.Google Scholar
  109. Walgenbach, F. E., Economic damage Assessment of Flora and Fauna Resulting from Unlawful Environmental Degradation (Manuscript, California Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento, CA, 1979).Google Scholar
  110. Watanabe, T. and T. Iwase, “Developmental and Dysmorphongenic Effects of Glufosinate Ammonium on Mouse Embryos in Culture,” Tetratogenesis, Carcinogenesis and Mutagenesis 16(6) (1996), 287-299.Google Scholar
  111. Wellings, C. R. and R. A. McIntosh, “Puccina straiiformis F sp tririci in Australia: Pathogenic Changes During First 10 Years,” Plant Pathology (London) 39(2) (1990), 316-325.Google Scholar
  112. White, D. H., C. A. Mitchell, L. D. Wynn, E. L. Flickinger, and E. J. Kolbe, “Organophosphate Insecticide Poisoning of Canada Geese in the Texas Panhandle,” Journal of Field Ornithology 53 (1982), 22-27.Google Scholar
  113. Wilkinson, C. F., “Introduction and Overview,” in S.R. Baker and C.F. Wilkinson (eds.), The Effects of Pesticides on Human Health, Proceedings of a Workshop May 9-11, 1988, Keystone, Colorado (Princeton Scientific Publishing, Princeton, 1990), pp. 5-33.Google Scholar
  114. WHO (World Health Organization), Glyphosate (WHO, Geneva, Switzerland, 1994).Google Scholar
  115. Wrubel, R. P. and J. Gressel, “Are Herbicide Mixtures Useful for Delaying the Rapid Evolution of Resistance? A Case Study,” Weed Technology 8 (1994), 635-648Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maurizio G. Paoletti
    • 1
  • David Pimentel
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of BiologyUniversity of PadovaPadovaItaly
  2. 2.College of Agriculture and Life SciencesCornell UniversityIthaca

Personalised recommendations