Skip to main content
Log in

The Ontological Constitution of Bounding-Judging in the Phenomenological Epistemology of von Bertalanffy's General System Theory

  • Published:
Systemic Practice and Action Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An analysis of the current presentation of boundary judgments in the Critical Systems literature highlights a general result: that the activity of bounding has been, implicitly or explicitly, considered as an epistemological issue. By arguing that knowledge is not produced singularly by bounding, the paper informs this general result. This, in turn, informs other results, which have emerged in current understanding. In particular, the paper argues (a) the reason why knowledge indeed never attains the status of "objective or right" knowledge, (b) how critique is dependent on some positing of knowledge, and (c) the exact place where critique is actioned. von Bertalanffy's attempted systems epistemology is considered at length because it explains and informs the epistemological conclusions seen to have been drawn in the current Critical Systems literature. von Bertalanffy's attempt requires the support of Husserlian phenomenology, especially Sartre's understanding of it. This requires an in-depth discussion of the phenomenological understanding of consciousness. Since the conclusions stem from von Bertalanffy, the paper reconsiders the status of General System Theory in Critical Systems Thinking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackoff, R. (1963). General systems theory and systems research contrasting conceptions of systems science. General Systems 8, 117. As referenced in Flood, R. L. and Robinson, S. A. (1989). Whatever happened to General Systems Theory? In Flood, R. L., Jackson, M. C., and Keys, P. (eds.), Systems Prospects: The Next Ten Years of Systems Research, Plenum, New York, pp. 61—66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, J. (1959). The discovery of what it means to be an American. New York Times Book Review 25/1/59. Collected in Baldwin, J. (1991). Nobody Knows My Name, Penguin, London.

  • Berry, T. (1988). The Dream of the Earth, Sierra Club, San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulding, K. (1956). General Systems Theory—the skeleton of science. General Systems 1, 11. As referenced in Flood, R. L. and Robinson, S. A. (1989). Whatever happened to General Systems Theory? In Flood, R. L., Jackson, M. C., and Keys, P. (eds.), Systems Prospects: The Next Ten Years of Systems Research, Plenum, New York, pp. 61—66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brocklesby, J., and Cummings, S. (1996). Foucault plays Habermas: an alternative philosophical underpinning for critical systems thinking. J. Operational Res. Soc. 47, 741–754.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caws, P. (1967). Science and system: On the unity and diversity of scientific theory. General Systems 12, 3. As referenced in Flood, R. L. and Robinson, S. A. (1989). Whatever happened to General Systems Theory? In Flood, R. L., Jackson, M. C., and Keys, P. (eds.), Systems Prospects: The Next Ten Years of Systems Research, Plenum, New York, pp. 61—66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P. (1981a). Systems Thinking, Systems Practice, Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P. (1981b). Rethinking a systems approach. J. Appl. Systems Anal. 8, 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P. (1985). From optimizing to learning: A development of systems thinking for the 1990s. In Flood, R. L. and Jackson, M. C. (eds.), Critical Systems Thinking: Directed Readings, Wiley, Chichester, pp. 59–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman, C. W. (1971). The Design of Inquiring Systems. Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cilliers, P. (1998). Complexity and Postmodernism: Understanding Complex systems, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cilliers, P. (1998). Complexity and Postmodernism: Understanding Complex Systems, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, S., Lehaney, B., and Martin, S. (1997). A Review of Problem Structuring Methodologies. Systemist 19, 11–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comte, A. (1988). In Hackett, F. (ed. and transl.), Introduction to Positive Philosophy, Indianapolis, IN. Selections from the first volume of Comte's Cours de philosophie positive, published in 1830; first presented as lectures in 1826.

  • Cooper, D. E. (1999). Existentialism: A Reconstruction, 2nd edn., Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coveney, P., and Highfield, R. (1995). Frontiers of Complexity Theory, Faber and Faber, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cumming, R. D. (ed.) (1965). The Philosophy of Jean-Paul Sartre, Methuen, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Muralt, A. (1974). In Breckon, G. L. (transl.), The Idea of Phenomenology: Husserlian Exemplarism, Northwestern University Press, Evanston, IL. First published (1958) L'Idée de la Phénoménologie: L'Exemplarisme Husserlian, Presses Universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood, R. L. (1999). Give it a go Georgiou! J. Operational Res. Soc. 50, 99–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood, R. L. (2000). The relationship of “Systems Thinking” to action research. In Bradbury, H., and Reason, P. (eds.), Handbook of Action Research, Sage, London, pp. 0–0.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood, R. L. and Jackson, M. C. (1991). Creative Problem Solving: Total Systems Intervention. Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood, R. L. and Robinson, S. A. (1989). Whatever happened to General Systems Theory? In Flood, R. L., Jackson, M. C., and Keys, P. (eds.). Systems Prospects: The Next Ten Years of Systems Research, Plenum, New York, pp. 61–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgiou, I. (1999). Groundwork of a Sartrean Input Toward Informing Some Concerns of Critical Systems Thinking. Systemic Pract. Action Res. 12, 585–605.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1962). In McQuarrie, J. and Robinson, J. (transl.), Being and Time, Blackwell, Oxford. Originally published (1927) Sein und Zeit. Erste Hälfte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E. (1990). In Alston, W. P. and Nakhnikian, G., (eds.) The Idea of Phenomenology, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht. First delivered as a set of five lectures in 1907 in Göttingen. First published (1950). In Biemel, W., Die Idee der Phänomenologie, Martinus Nijhoff, Lieden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E. (1998). In Koestenbaum, P. (Translator) The Paris Lectures, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht. First delivered in German as a pair of two-hour lecture papers in 1929 at the Sorbonne, Paris under the title Einleitung in die transzendentale Phänomenologie (Introduction to Transcendental Phenomenology). First published, 1967, Martinus Nijhoff, Lieden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Introna, L. (1997). Management, Information and Power, Macmillan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. C. (1985). The itinerary of a critical approach. J. Operational Res. Soc. 36, 878–881.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. C. (1991). The origins and nature of Critical Systems Thinking. Systems Pract. 4, 131–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, W. T., and Fogelin, R. J. (1997). A History of Western Philosophy: The Twentieth Century to Quine and Derrida, Harcourt Brace, Fort Worth, TX.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kierkegaard, S. (1992). In Hong, Howard V. and Hong, Edna H. (eds. and transl.), Concluding Unscientific Postscript to Philosophical Fragments, Vol. 1. with Introduction and Notes (Vol. 2), Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ. First published pseudonymously in Danish (1846) under the name of Johannes Climacus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinas, E. (1998). In Orianne, A. (Transl.), The Theory of Intuition in Husserl's Phenomenology, Northwestern University Press, Evanston, IL. First published: (1930) Théorie de l'intuition dans la phénoménologie de Husserl, Alcan, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lilienfeld, R. (1978). The Rise of Systems Theory. Wiley, New York. As referenced in Flood, R. L. and Robinson, S. A. (1989). Whatever happened to General Systems Theory? In Flood, R. L., Jackson, M. C., and Keys, P. (eds.). Systems Prospects: The Next Ten Years of Systems Research, Plenum, New York, pp. 61—66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964). Phenomenology and the Sciences of Man. Reproduced from the course, given by Merleau-Ponty at the Sorbonne (1950/51) In Wild J. (transl.) Les sciences de l'homme et la phénoménologie, collected in Edie, J. M. (ed.) (1964) The Primacy of Perception and Other Essays on Phenomenological Psychology, The Philosophy Of Art, History and Politics. Northwestern University Press, Evanston, IL.

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (1996). In Smith, C. (transl.), Phenomenology of Perception, Routledge, London. Originally published (1945) Phénoménologie de la perception. Paris, Gallimard. First English language edition, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, G. (1992). The sacred and profane in critical systems thinking. Systems Pract. 5, 5–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, G. (1993). A Reply To Haridimos Tsoukas, The radical critic of radical critique. Systems Pract. 6, 301–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, G. (1994). Ecology and the poverty of humanism: A critical systems perspective. Systems Res. 11, 67–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, G. (1995). What is this thing called Critical Systems Thinking? In Gregory, A, Mears-Young, B. R. and Ragsdell, G. (eds.), Critical Issues in Systems Theory and Practice, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 61–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, G. (1997a). Mixing methods: Developing systemic intervention. In Mingers, J. and Gill, A. (eds.), Multimethodology: The Theory and Practice of Combining Management Science Methodologies, Wiley, Chichester, pp. 249–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, G. (1997b). Dealing with coercion: Critical Systems heuristics and beyond. Systems Pract. 10, 37–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mingers, J. (1992). Criticizing the phenomenological critique—autopoiesis and critical realism. Systems Pract. 5, 173–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohanty, J. N. (1997). Phenomenology: Between Essentialism and Transcendental Philosophy. Northwestern University Press, Evanston, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naughton, J. (1981). Theory and Practice in Systems Research. J. Appl Systems Anal., 8, 61. As referenced in Flood, R. L. and Robinson, S. A. (1989). Whatever happened to General Systems Theory? In Flood, R. L., Jackson, M. C., and Keys, P. (eds.), Systems Prospects: The Next Ten Years of Systems Research, Plenum, New York, pp. 61—66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ormerod, R. (1997). The design of organisational intervention: Choosing the approach. Omega 25, 415–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reason, P. (ed.) (1994). Participation in Human Inquiry, Sage, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romm, N. R. A. (1995). Knowing as intervention: Reflections on the application of systems ideas. Systems Pract. 8, 137–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartre, J-P. (1995). In Barnes, H. (transl.), Being and Nothingness, Routledge, London. First published: (1943) L'Être et le Néant, Gallimard, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartre, J-P. (1998). In Williams, F. and Kirkpatrick, R. (transl.), The Transcendence of the Ego, Hill and Wang, New York. First published: (1936) La Transcendance de L'Ego, Recherches Philosophiques VI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shoemaker, S. (1999). Self and body. Interview in The Philosophers' Magazine, Issue 8 (Autumn), 29.

  • Solomon, R. (1998). The Big Questions, Harcourt Brace, Fort Worth, TX.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsoukas, H. (1992). Panoptic reason and the search for totality: A critical assessment of the Critical Systems perspective. Hum. Relat. 45, 637–657.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, W. (1983). Critical Heuristics of Social Planning: A New Approach to Practical Philosophy. Haupt, Bern.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, W. (1987). Critical heuristics of social systems design. In Flood, R. L. and Jackson, M. C. (eds.) Critical Systems Thinking—Directed Readings. Wiley, Chichester, pp. 103–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, W. (1988a). Churchman's “Process of unfolding”—Its significance for policy analysis and evaluation. Systems Pract. 1, 415–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, W. (1988b). C. West Churchman—75 years. Systems Pract. 1, 341–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, W. (1994). Can we secure future-responsive management through systems thinking and design? Interfaces 24, 26–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General System Theory—Foundations, Developoment, Applications, George Braziller, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldrop, M. M. (1992). Complexity: The Emerging Science at the Edge of Order and Chaos, Viking, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westphal, M. (1996). Becoming a Self: A Reading of Kierkegaard's Concluding Unscientific Postscript, Purdue University Press, West Lafayette, IN.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Georgiou, I. The Ontological Constitution of Bounding-Judging in the Phenomenological Epistemology of von Bertalanffy's General System Theory. Systemic Practice and Action Research 13, 391–424 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009567111785

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009567111785

Navigation