Skip to main content
Log in

Research Note: Sense-Seeking Systems as Normative Model for Innovative Sociocultural Systems

  • Published:
Systemic Practice and Action Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A concept of innovation as beneficial change that results from change in knowledge leads to a foundational model of sociocultural systems, labeled the Sense-Seeking Systems Model, which proclaims that the essence of human striving is to seek and disclose and thereby to gain meaning or sense. Two of the most distinctive characteristics of the model are that it entertains the concept of creation or discovery of sense as the raison d'être of human systems, and that systems characterized by this model are intrinsically dynamic, with such dynamism emanating from interaction of multiple visions and reflected in the dialectical nature of such systems. A focus on sense-gaining highlights that where possible loss of sense threatens, the urge to regain sense induces aspiration for vision, and vision promises gain of sense. Emphasizing multiple visions, though, admits the necessity and sensibility of maintaining the likes of variety, inherent tension, debate, conflict, and dialectics for effecting innovation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackoff, R. L., and Emery, F. E. (1972). On Purposeful Systems, Tavistock, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arbib, M. A., and Hesse, M. B. (1986). The Construction of Reality, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C., and Schön, D. A. (1974). Theory in Practice: Increasing Professional Effectiveness, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aubrey, R., Cohen, P. M. (1995). Working Wisdom: Timeless Skills and Vanguard Strategies for Learning Organizations, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, G. (1973). Steps to an Ecology of Mind, Granada Publishing, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, W. (1968). Society as a complex adaptive system. In Buckley, W. (ed.), Modern Systems Research for the Behavioral Scientist, Aldine, Chicago, pp. 490–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrell, G., and Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis, Heinemann Educational Books, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clouser, R. A. (1991). The Myth of Religious Neutrality, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, IN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coetzee, F. P. (1999). A Normative Model of Innovative Systems, Doctoral dissertation, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dooyeweerd, H. (1953) (Vol. I), (1955) (Vol. II), (1957) (Vol. III), (1958) (Vol. IV). A New Critique of Theoretical Thought, The Presbyterian and Reformed Publishing Company, Philadelphia, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, W. R. (1987). Human Communication as Narration: Toward a Philosophy of Reason, Value, and Action, University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, SC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood, R. L., and Romm, R. A. (1996). Diversity Management: Triple Loop Learning, Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gharajedaghi, J. (1985). Toward a Systems Theory of Organization, Intersystems Publications, Seaside, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, G. P. (1991). Organizational learning: the contributing processes and the literatures. Organ. Sci., 2, (1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Joad, C. E. M. (1935). Guide to Philosophy, Random House, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalsbeek, L. (1975). Contours of a Christian Philosophy (Translated by Bernard and Josina Zylstra), Wedge, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, G. (1986). Images of Organization, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nevis, E. C., DiBella, A. J., and Gould, J. M. (1995). Understanding organizations as learning systems. Sloan Manage. Rev. Winter, pp. 73–85.

  • Parikh, J., Neubauer, F. F., and Lank, A. G. (1994). Intuition—The New Frontier of Management, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slife, B. D., and Williams, R. N. (1995). What's Behind the Research? Discovering Hidden Assumptions in the Behavioral Sciences, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, W. (1983). Critical Heuristics of Social Planning, Paul Haupt, Berne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varela, F. J. (1979). Principles of Biological Autonomy, North Holland, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varela, F. J., and Dupuy, J-P. (eds.) (1992). Understanding Origins, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Sci. Quart. 21, 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (1979). The Social Psychology of Organizing, 2nd edn., Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in Organizations, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Coetzee, F.P.(. Research Note: Sense-Seeking Systems as Normative Model for Innovative Sociocultural Systems. Systemic Practice and Action Research 13, 425–442 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009558909968

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009558909968

Navigation