Abstract
The concept of substantial equivalence,introduced for the risk assessment of geneticallymodified (GM) food, is a reducing concept because itignores the context in which these products have beenproduced and brought to the consumer at the end of thefood chain. Food quality cannot be restricted to meresubstance and food acts on human beings not only atthe level of nutrition but also through theirrelationship to environment and society. To make thiscontext explicit, I will introduce an ``equivalencescale'' for the evaluation of food chains (GM or notGM). By contrast with substantial equivalence, whichinvolves mainly quantitative, analytical methods ofevaluation, ``qualitative equivalence'' refers to ``less''or non-substantial factors that require new methodsof evaluation based on qualitative principles.``Ethical equivalence'' refers to factors that show themoral value contained in food products. To analyze thedifferent levels at which ethics is needed in foodchains, I will use the French principles: ``Liberty,Equality, Fraternity,'' or freedom, equality,solidarity, and add a fourth principle:sustainability. Sustainability, solidarity, andfreedom can be applied to the evaluation ofenvironmental, socio-economic, and socio-culturalethical equivalence, respectively. Equality refers tojustice and should operate so as to guarantee thatsustainability, solidarity, and freedom are satisfied.I suggest that ethics can provide a basis for arenewal of the food chain concept. Besides QualityAssurance, it is now essential to develop an ``EthicalAssurance'' and this equivalence scale could provide abasis to set up ``Ethical Assurance Standards'' (EAS)for food chains.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Arnsperger, C., Éthique Économique et Sociale (La Découverte, série Repères, Namur, in press).
Brown, J. K. M., “How to Feed the World, in Two Contradictory Lessons,” Trends in Plant Sciences 3 (1998), 409-410.
Christian Aid, Selling Suicide Farming, False Promises and Genetic Engineering in Developing Countries, Report, London (1999).
Coghlan, A., “Seeds of Change,” The New Scientist 29 January (2000), 12.
Daily, G. C. and B. H. Walker, “Seeking the Great Transition,” Nature 403 (2000), 243-245.
Descartes, R., Discourse on Method and The Meditations (Penguin Classics, London, 1987).
Drinkwater, L. E., P. Wagoner, and M. Sarrantonio, “Legume-Based Cropping Systems Have Reduced Carbon and Nitrogen Losses,” Nature 396 (1998), 262-264.
Dunwell, J. M., “Transgenic Crops: The Next Generation, or an Example of 2020 Vision,” Annals of Botany 84 (1999), 269-277.
ESRC, “The Politics of GM Food: Risk, Science and Public Trust,” Environment Change Programme, www.gecko.ac.uk. (1999).
FAO, Biotechnology and Food Safety, Report, Rome, http://www.fao.org/ (1996).
Fears, R. and E. Tambuyzer, “Core Ethical Values for European Bioindustries,” Nature Biotechnology 17 (1999), 114-115.
Flavell, R. B., “Plant Biotechnology. Moral Dilemmas,” Current Opinion in Plant Biology 3 (2000), 143-146.
Food Ethic Council, Novel Food: Beyond Nuffield, Report, www.users.globalnet.co.uk/ ~foodeth (1999).
Gasson, M. J., “Genetically Modified Foods Face Rigorous Safety Evaluation,” Nature 402 (1999), 229.
Guerinot, M. L., “The Green Revolution Strikes Gold,” Science 287 (2000), 241 and 243.
Halsberger, A. G., “Monitoring and Labeling for Genetically Modified Products,” Science 287 (2000), 431-432.
Ho, M.-W. and R. A. Steinbrecher, “Fatal Flaws in Food Safety Assessment: Critique of the Joint FAO/WHO Biotechnology and Food Safety Report,” Physicians and Scientists for Responsible Application of Science and Technology (PSRAST) homepage, http://www.psrast.org/ (1998).
Holdrege, C., Genetics and the Manipulation of Life: The Forgotten Factor of Context (Lindisfarne Press, Hudson, 1996).
Husset, M.-J., L'Opinion Publique Face aux Plantes Transgéniques (Albin Michel, Paris, 1998), pp. 110-117.
Käppeli, O. and L. Auberson, “The Science and Intricacy of Environmental Safety Evaluations,” Trends in Biotechnology 15 (1997), 342-349.
Käppeli, O. and L. Auberson, “How Safe is Safe Enough in Plant Genetic Engineering?” Trends in Plant Sciences 3 (1998), 276-281.
Kinderlerer, J., “Is a European Convention on the Ethical Use of Modern Biotechnology Needed?” Trends in Biotechnology 18 (2000), 87-90.
Ladrière, J., L'Éthique dans l'Uunivers de la Rationalité (Artel-Fides, Namur, 1997).
Mann, C. C., “Crop Scientists Seek a New Revolution,” Science 283 (1999), 310-314.
Matson, P. A., W. J. Parton, A. G. Power, and M. J. Swift, “Agricultural Intensification and Ecosystem Properties,” Science 277 (1997), 504-509.
Michael, A., “'GM-Free' Food Labels are Value-Free,” Nature Biotechnology 17 (1999), 420.
Miller, H. I., “Substantial Equivalence: Its Uses and Abuses,” Nature Biotechnology 17 (1999), 1042-1043.
Millstone, E., E. Brunner, and S. Mayer, “Beyond 'Substantial Equivalence',” Nature 401 (1999a), 525-526.
Millstone, E., E. Brunner, and S. Mayer, “Seeking Clarity in the Debate over the Safety of GM Foods,” Nature 402 (1999b), 575.
Nuffield Council on Bioethics, Genetically Modified Crops: The Ethical and Social Issues, Report, http://www.nuffield.org.uk/bioethics/ (1999).
OECD, Safety Evaluation of Foods Derived by Modern Biotechnology-Concepts and Principles. Report, Paris (1993).
OECD, OECD Workshop on the Toxicological and Nutritional Testing of Novel Foods. Report, Aussois (1998).
Ricoeur, P., Soi-Même Comme un Autre (Seuil, Paris, 1990).
Tester, M., S. L. Taylor, S. L. Hefle, and M. W. Ho, “Seeking Clarity in the Debate over the Safety of GM Foods,” Nature 402 (1999), 575.
Tilman, D., “The Greening of the Green Revolution,” Nature 396 (1998), 211-212.
Trewavas, A., “Much Food, Many Problems,” Nature 402 (1999), 231-232.
Trewavas, A. and C. J. Leavert, “Conventional Crops are the Test of GM Prejudice” Kearns, P. and P. Mayers, “Substantial Equivalence is a Useful Tool” Burke, D. “No GM Conspiracy”, Nature 401 (1999), 640-641.
Verheye, W. H., “Local Farmers would be Able to Feed Africa if They were Given the Chance,” Nature 404 (2000), 431.
Ye, X., S. Al-Babili, A. Klöti, J. Zhang, P. Lucca, P. Beyer, and I. Potrykus, “Engineering the Provitamin A (Beta-Carotene) Biosynthetic Pathway into (Carotenoid-Free) Rice Endosperm,” Science 287 (2000), 303-305.
Zechendorf, B., “Sustainable Development: How can Biotechnology Contribute?” Trends in Biotechnology 17 (1999), 219-225.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pouteau, S. Beyond Substantial Equivalence: Ethical Equivalence. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 13, 273–291 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009546031890
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009546031890