Skip to main content
Log in

The Effect of Passing an “Anti-immigrant” Ballot Proposition on the Use of Prenatal Care by Foreign-Born Mothers in California

  • Published:
Journal of Immigrant Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examines whether the passage of California's Proposition 187, a proposition designed to restrict undocumented immigrants from using public services, had a negative effect on the use of prenatal care and birth outcomes. Comparisons of prenatal care use and birth outcomes before and after the passage of the proposition are made between low-education foreign-born and U.S.-born mothers using California's Birth Public Use files. Multivariate linear and logistic regressions were used to control for regional and maternal characteristics. We find a significant but small decline in the use of prenatal care by low-education foreign-born women after Proposition 187 passed; however, there was no detectable deterioration of birth outcomes. Whether future reductions in the availability of prenatal care would damage the health of children is unclear.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Ayres D: Federal judge voids some limits of California's services to aliens. New York Times 1995:C18

  2. Moss N, Baumeister L, Biewener J: Perspectives of Latina immigrant women on Proposition 187. J Am Med Womens Assoc 1996; 51:161-165

    Google Scholar 

  3. Martin P: Parts of Prop. 187 unconstitutional. Migrat News 1995;2

  4. Romney L: Youth dies as medical treatment is delayed: Parents say they feared being reported if they went to hospital: Latino activists say they regard the boy as a victim of Prop 187. Los Angeles Times 1994:A3

  5. Cabanatuan M: Clinic use drops: Fewer Hispanics in prenatal care: False rumors from Prop 187 blamed for keeping Hispanics away. Modesto Bee 1995:A1

  6. Press A: Patient loads plummet since Prop 187. San Diego Union-Tribune 1994:A3

  7. California Legislative Analyst's Office: 1994 California voter information: Analysis of proposition 187 by the legislative analyst. Sacramento: California Secretary of State's Office; 1994

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ziv T, Lo B: Denial of care to illegal immigrants: Proposition 187 in California. N Engl J Med 1995; 332:1095-1098

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fenton J, Catalano R, Hargreaves W: Effect of Proposition 187 on mental health service use in California: A case study. Health Aff 1996; 15:182-190

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fenton J, Moss N, Kahlil H, Asch S: The effect of California's Proposition 187 on the use of primary care clinics. West JMed 1997; 166:16-20

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fix M, Passel J: Trends in Noncitizens' and Citizens' Use of Public Benefits Following Welfare Reform: 1994–97. Washington, DC: Urban Institute; 1999

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zimmerman W, Fix M: Declining Immigrant Applications for MediCal and Welfare Benefits in Los Angeles County. Washington, DC: Urban Institute; 1998

    Google Scholar 

  13. Eisner V, Brazie J, Pratt M, Hexter A: The risk of low birth weight. Am J Public Health 1979; 69:887-893

    Google Scholar 

  14. Harris J: Prenatal medical care an infant mortality. In: Fuchs V, ed. Economic Aspects of Health. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1982:15-52

    Google Scholar 

  15. Schramm W: Weighing costs and benefits of adequate prenatal care for 12,023 births in Missouri's Medicaid program, 1988. Public Health Rep 1988; 107:647-652

    Google Scholar 

  16. House of Representatives (US) Committee on the Budget: Report of the Committee on the Budget to Accompany HR 5300 (Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1986). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office; 1986

    Google Scholar 

  17. Halfon N, Wood D, Valdez R, Pereyra M, Duan N: Medicaid enrollment and health services access by Latino children in inner-city Los Angeles. JAMA 1997; 277:636-641

    Google Scholar 

  18. McDuffie RJ, Beck A, Bischoff K, Cross J, Orleans M: Effect of frequency of prenatal care visits on perinatal outcome among low-risk women. JAMA 1996; 275:847-851

    Google Scholar 

  19. Alexander G, Cornely D: Prenatal care utilization: Its measurement and relationship to pregnancy outcome. Am J Prev Med 1987; 3:243-253

    Google Scholar 

  20. Joyce T: Self-selection, prenatal care, and birthweight among Blacks, Whites, and Hispanics in New York City. J Hum Resources 1994; 29:762-794

    Google Scholar 

  21. Grossman M, Joyce T: Unobservables, pregnancy resolutions, and birth weight production functions in New York City. J Polit Econ 1990; 98:983-1007

    Google Scholar 

  22. California Department of Health Services, Vital Statistics Section: Birth Public Use Tape, 1989-1995. Sacramento, CA: Department of Health Services, Vital Statistics Section; 1996

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lantz PM, Penrod JR: Measurement error in prenatal care utilization: Evidence of attenuation bias in the estimation of birth weight. Matern Child Health J 2000; 4:39-52

    Google Scholar 

  24. Guendelman S, Jasis M: Giving birth across the border: The San Diego–Tijuana connection. Soc Sci Med 1992; 34:419-425

    Google Scholar 

  25. Immigration and Naturalization Service (US) Office of Policy and Planning: Estimates of the Unauthorized Immigrant Population Residing in the United States: October 1996 (unpublished manuscript). Washington, DC: INS Office of Public Affairs; 1997

    Google Scholar 

  26. U.S. Bureau of the Census: 1996 March Current Population Survey (CPS). Washington, DC: Bureau of the Census (US); 1997

    Google Scholar 

  27. Mexican Migration Project Data: Philadelphia, PA: National Institute of Child Health and Development; 1994

  28. U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Office of Strategic Planning: 1992 legalization summary public use tape. Washington, DC: Immigration and Naturalization Service (US), Statistics Division, Office of Strategic Planning; 1992

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hornblower M: Hot lines and hot tempers. Time 1994; 36-37

  30. Kotelchuck M: An evaluation of the Kessner adequacy of prenatal care index and a proposed adequacy of Prenatal Care Utilization Index. Am J Public Health 1994; 84:1414-1420

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kotelchuck M: The adequacy of prenatal care utilization index: Its U.S. distribution and association with low birthweight. Am J Public Health 1994; 84:1486-1489

    Google Scholar 

  32. Lu MC, Lin YG, Prietto NM, Garite TJ: Elimination of public funding of prenatal care for undocumented immigrants in California: A cost/benefit analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 182:233-239

    Google Scholar 

  33. Malloy M, Kao T, Lee Y: Analyzing the effect of prenatal care on pregnancy outcome: A conditional approach. Am J Public Health 1992; 82:448-450

    Google Scholar 

  34. Park LSH, Sarnoff R, Bender C, Korenbrot C: Impact of recent welfare and immigration reforms on use of Medicaid for prenatal care by immigrants in California. J Immigrant Health 2000; 2:5-22

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Spetz, J., Baker, L., Phibbs, C. et al. The Effect of Passing an “Anti-immigrant” Ballot Proposition on the Use of Prenatal Care by Foreign-Born Mothers in California. Journal of Immigrant Health 2, 203–212 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009540313141

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009540313141

Navigation