Skip to main content
Log in

A Study and Automatic Solution for Multishot Treatment Planning for the γ-Knife

  • Published:
Journal of Radiosurgery

Abstract

It is recognized that multiple-shot radiosurgery using the Leksell Gamma Knife (LGK) can result in larger penumbra dose and less target dose homogeneity compared with a single shot treatment. In addition, the number of shots used increases significantly with increasing volume, which makes planning and optimization time consuming and complex. Although such complexity may not affect the accuracy of treatment delivery itself, it is difficult to assess the dosimetrical merits of a given plan. To deal with this complicated process, we have studied shot-related effects and target shape as separate issues. Shot-related effects include homogeneity, penumbra, shot weight, and prescription isodose line “shift.” Target shape is analyzed using morphological tools. Target volume and shape, as represented by the three-dimensional (3-D) medial axis transform or skeleton, are used to determine optimal shot positions, sizes, and number. These parameters are determined from successive 3-D skeletons of the unplanned target volume. Essentially, target shape is replicated by the arrangement of shots compromising the 3-D skeleton, forcing a conformal dose distribution. This planning process has been automated for multishot treatment. A clinical case in 3-D demonstrates this approach as a replacement for manual planning when a plan with multiple shots is required.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Wu A: Physics and dosimetry of the Gamma knife. Neurosurg Clin N Amer 3:35–50, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  2. Walton L, Bomford CK, Ramsden D: The Sheffield stereotactic radiosurgery unit: physical characteristics and principles of operation. Brit J Radiol 60:897–960, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  3. Podgorsak EB, Pike, GB, Oliver A, Pla M, Souhami L: Radiosurgery With high energy photon beams: Comparison among techniques. Intern J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 16:857–865, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  4. Graham JD, Nahum AE, Brada M: A comparison of techniques for stereotactic radiotherapy by linear accelerator based on 3-dimensional dose distribution. Radiother Oncol 22:29–35, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pla C, Podgorsak EB, Pla M, Souhami L, Clark BG, Carson JL: Considerations on the use of multiple isocenters in stereotatic Radiosurgery. Med Phys 22:676, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  6. Stone RA, Smith V, Verhey L: Inverse treatment planning for the gamma knife. Med Phys 20:865, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gibon D, Rousseau J, Castelan B, Blond S, Vasseur C, Marchandise X: Treatment planning optimization by conjugate gradients and simulated annealing methods in stereotactic radiosurgery. Intern Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 33:201–210, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gibon D, Rousseau J: Improved V-knife radiosurgery using combinations of different sized collimators. J Radiosurg 1:43–49, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  9. Smith V, Verhey L, Serago C: Comparison of radiosurgery treatment modalities based on complication and control probabilities. Intern J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 40:507–513, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wu Q: Treatment Planning Optimization for Leksell Gamma Knife Radiosurgery, Ph.D. Thesis, 1996

  11. Blum H: Biological shape and visual science: Part I. J Theoret Biol 38:205–287, 1973

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wu Q, Bourland JD, Robb RA: Fast 3D medial axis transformation to reduce computation and complexity in radiosurgery treatment planning. SPIE 2710:562–571, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  13. Shaw E et al: Radiation therapy oncology group: Radiosurgery quality assurance guidelines. Intern Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 27:1231–1239, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  14. Treuer U, Treuer H, Hoevels M, Muller P, Sturm V: Computerized optimization of multiple isocentres in stereotactic convergent beam irradiation. Phys Med Biol. 43(1):49–64, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  15. Shu H, Yan YL, Bao XD, Fu Y, Luo LM: Treatment planning optimization by quasi-Newton and simulated annealing methods for gamma unit treatment system. Phys Med Biol. 43(10):2795–805, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  16. Elekta Instruments manual Leksell GammaPlan Online Reference, Revision 01, Chapter 9, pp. 55–68

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wu, Q.J., Bourland, J.D. A Study and Automatic Solution for Multishot Treatment Planning for the γ-Knife. Journal of Radiosurgery 3, 77–84 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009533617740

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009533617740

Navigation