Abstract
This is the second article in a trilogy devoted to inquiring about the historical meaning of the intimate link between a systems approach and world issues, so appropriate for Churchman's initial work on systems. After examining the logical relationship between modern systems thinking and world issues in the first article, in this second article the historical conditions for the formation of modern systems thinking are explored. It is shown how the intimate relationship between the will to systems and the notion of humanity gives full meaning, within the modern constellation, to Churchman's plea for a systems approach to world problems. However, in the light of this historical–ontological inquiry, systems thinking appears as both a propellant for the formation of the new constellation of modernity and a propellant for its destruction.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Churchman, C. W. (1968). The Systems Approach, Dell, New York.
Fuenmayor, R. L. (1991a). The roots of reductionism: A counter-ontoepistemology for a systems approach. Syst. Pract. 4, 419-447.
Fuenmayor, R. L. (1991b). The self-referential structure of an everyday-living situation: A phenomenological ontology for interpretive systemology. Syst. Pract. 4, 449-472.
Fuenmayor, R. L. (1991c). Truth and openness: An epistemology for interpretive systemology. Syst. Pract. 4, 473-490.
Heidegger, M. (1952a). The age of the world picture. In Heidegger, M. (1977). The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays, Harper & Row, New York.
Heidegger, M. (1952b). The word of Nietzsche: “God is dead.” In Heidegger, M. (1977). The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays, Harper & Row, New York.
Heidegger, M. (1967). Modern science, metaphysics and mathematics. In Basic Writings, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
Heidegger, M. (1985). Schelling's Treatise on the Essence of Human Freedom, Ohio University Press, Athens.
Kant, I. (1781-1787). Critique of Pure Reason (Smith, N. K., transl.), Macmillan, London, 1929.
Kant, I. (1784). What is enlightenment? In Kant, I. (ed.), Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals, Bobbs-Merrill, New York.
Kant, I. (1785). Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals (Ellington, J. W., trans.), Hackett, Indianapolis.
Klein, E. (1967). A Comprehensive Etymological Dictionary of the English Language, Elsevier, Amsterdam.
Rorty, R. (1996). Who are we?: Moral universalism and economic triage. Presented at the Second UNESCO Philosophy Forum, Paris, March. http://www.unesco.org/phiweb/uk/2rpu/rort/rort.html.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fuenmayor, R. The Oblivion of Churchman's Plea for a Systems Approach to World Problems. II. The Rise of the Modern Constellation. Systemic Practice and Action Research 14, 29–45 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009531609983
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009531609983