Maternal and Child Health Journal

, Volume 4, Issue 3, pp 191–196 | Cite as

Pregnancy Intention and Pregnancy Happiness: Are They Different?

  • Marjorie R. Sable
  • M. Kay Libbus
Article

Abstract

Objectives: This study examines the relationship among pregnancy intention and attitudes, inconsistent contraceptive use, and plans for potential pregnancy among 311 women who presented at local health departments to seek a pregnancy test and for whom a pregnancy would be unintended. Methods: Women were surveyed prior to receiving pregnancy tests. Pregnancy intention was measured using traditional classifications of mistimed and unwanted pregnancies. Frequency distributions and chi-square tests were computed to examine and compare rates of happiness about the pregnancy among women with mistimed or unwanted pregnancy and to compare rates of inconsistent contraceptive use and plans for the pregnancy by intention and level of happiness. Results: Although all of the women selected for our sample stated that their pregnancies would be unintended, almost half (46%) were inconsistent contraceptive users. Further, 48% reported that they would be somewhat or very happy about a pregnancy. The proportion of women who were uncertain about the future of a pregnancy and who considered adoption or abortion was highest among those for whom a potential pregnancy was mistimed and who were unhappy about the pregnancy. Conclusions: Differentiating between pregnancy intention and happiness has practice implications for family planning and prenatal providers. Additional research should further elaborate these distinctions.

unintended pregnancy unwanted pregnancy pregnancy attitudes family planning contraceptive use 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    Trussell J, Vaughan B, Stanford J. Are all contraceptive failures unintended pregnancies? Evidence from the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth. Fam Plann Perspect 1999;31(5):246–47, 260.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    London K, Peterson L, Piccinino L. The National Survey of Family Growth: Principal source of statistics on unintended pregnancy. In: Brown SS, Eisenberg L, editors. The best intentions. Unintended pregnancy and the well-being of children and families. Washington DC: National Academy Press, 1995.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Luker K. A reminder that human behavior frequently refuses to conform to models created by researchers. Fam Plann Perspect 1999;31(5):248–9.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sable MR. Pregnancy intentions may not be a useful measure for research on maternal and child health. Fam Plann Perspect 1999;31(5):249–50.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zabin L. Ambivalent feelings about parenthood may lead to inconsistent contraceptive use and pregnancy. Fam Plann Perspect 1999;31(5):250–1.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bachrach C, Newcomer S. Intended pregnancies and unintended pregnancies: Distinct categories or opposite ends of a continuum? Fam Plann Perspect 1999;31(5):251–2.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zabin L, Astone N, Emerson M. Do adolescents want babies? The relationship between attitudes and behavior. J Res Adolesc 1993;3:67–86.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Campbell JD, Mitchell P, Stanford JB, Ewigman BG. Validating a model developed to predict prenatal care utilization. J Fam Pract 1995;41(5):457–64.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kaufmann RB, Morris L, Spitz AM. Comparison of two question sequences for assessing pregnancy intentions. Am J Epidemiol 1997;145(9):810–6.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Miller W. Reproductive decisions: How we make them and how they make us. In: Severy L, editor. Advances in population. London: Jessica Kingsley, 1994.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sable MR, Spencer JC, Stockbauer JW, Schramm WF, Howell V, Herman AA. Pregnancy wantedness and adverse pregnancy outcomes: Differences by race and Medicaid status. Fam Plann Perspect 1997;29(2):76–81.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sable MS, Wilkinson DS. Pregnancy intentions, pregnancy attitudes, and the use of prenatal care in Missouri. Matern Child Health J 1998;2(3):155–65.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sable MR, Libbus MK, Chiu J. Factors affecting contraceptive use in women with unintended pregnancies: Missouri, 1997. Fam Plann Perspect 2000;32(3):124–31.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Miller W. The motivational substrate of unintended and unwanted pregnancy. Report on a workshop on unwanted/unintended pregnancy. Bethesda, MD: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Mar 11–12, 1999.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hardy JB, Zabin LS. Adolescent pregnancy in an urban environment. Washington, DC: Urban Institute, 1991.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chandra A, Abma J, Maza P, Bachrach C. Adoption, adoption seeking, and relinquishment for adoption in the United States. Advance data from Vital and Health Statistics, No. 306, May 11, 1999, Centers for Disease Control, National Center for Health Statistics. (Available online at http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/ad306.pdf.)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ventura SJ, Moser WD, Curtin SC, Abma JC, Henshaw S. Trends in pregnancies and pregnancy rates by outcome: Estimates for the United States, 1976-1996. Vital and Health Statistics 21(56), Centers for Disease Control, National Center for Health Statistics. (Available on-line at http://www.cdc.gov/ nchs/data/sr21_56.pdf.)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hatcher RA, Trussell J, Stewart F, Cates W, Stewart GK, Guest F, Kowal D. Contraceptive technology, 17th ed. rev. New York: Ardent Media, 1998.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gazmararian JA, Lazorick S, Spitz AM, Ballard TJ, Saltzman LE, Marks JS. Prevalence of violence against pregnant women. JAMA 1996;275:1915–20.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Moore M. Reproductive health and intimate partner violence. Fam Plann Perspect 1999;31:302–6, 312.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Goodwin MM, Gazmararian JA, Johnson CH, Gilbert BC, Saltzman LE. Pregnancy intendedness and physical abuse around the time of pregnancy: Findings from the pregnancy risk assessment monitoring system, 1996-1997. Matern Child Health J 2000;4(2):85–92.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Horan DL, Chapin J, Klein L, Schmidt LA, Schulkin J. Domestic violence screening practices of obstetrician-gynecologists. Obstetr Gynecol 1998;92:785–9.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Healthy People 2000. Family planning. Healthy People 2000: National health promotion and disease prevention objectives, Publication PHS 91-50212. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 1990.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marjorie R. Sable
    • 1
  • M. Kay Libbus
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Social WorkUniversity of Missouri—ColumbiaUS
  2. 2.School of NursingUniversity of Missouri—ColumbiaUSA

Personalised recommendations