Skip to main content
Log in

The Assessment of Workaholism as Behavioral Tendencies: Scale Development and Preliminary Empirical Testing

  • Published:
International Journal of Stress Management

Abstract

This article reports on the development and preliminary empirical testing of two new scales designed to assess workaholic behavioral patterns. One scale assessed employee tendencies to perform nonrequired work (typically, spending time thinking of ways to perform work better), and the other measured tendencies to intrude on and attempt to control the work of others. These scales seem consistent with both conceptual definitions and anecdotal accounts of workaholism. Moreover, the scales were designed to assess behavioral tendencies rather than work attitudes, to circumvent the possibility of rationalization and denial among workaholic respondents, and to be applicable across multiple work contexts. Evidence from a sample of 278 employed respondents indicated that the scales were internally consistent, and represented distinct constructs. The scales also demonstrated evidence of convergent and discriminant validity. For example, scores on the nonrequired work scale correlated positively with hours worked and with the needs for achievement, autonomy, and affiliation. Scores on the control of others scale correlated positively with job involvement, stress, work-nonwork conflict, role conflict, dominance needs, and self-monitoring. In summary, the workaholism scales developed for this investigation appear both reliable and valid and thus potentially able to shed light on the phenomenon of workaholism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Akaike, H. (1987). Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrika, 52, 317-332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baechler, M. (1996). I'm Mary, and I'm a workaholic. Inc., 18(5), 29-30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, K. A. (1989). A new incremental fit index for general structural equation models. Sociological Methods and Research, 17, 303-316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, S. R., & Cheek, J. M. (1986). The role of factor analysis in the development and evaluation of personality scales. Journal of Personality, 54, 106-148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, R. J. (1999a). It's not how hard you work but how you work hard: Evaluating workaholism components. International Journal of Stress Management, 6, 225-239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, R. J. (1999b). Workaholism in organizations: Measurement validation and replication. International Journal of Stress Management, 6, 45-55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, R. J. (2000). Workaholism in organizations: Psychological and physical well-being consequences. Stress Medicine, 16, 11-16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A. (1995). An examination of the relationships between work commitment and nonwork domains. Human Relations, 48, 239-263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A. (1999). The relation between commitment forms and work outcomes in Jewish and Arab culture. Human Relations, 54, 371-391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costello, J. (2000). Full-time dilemma: Economy bedevils workaholics group. Wall Street Journal, February 8, p. A1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ettington, D. R. (1998). Successful career plateauing. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 52, 72-88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furnham, A., Brewin, C. R., & O'Kelly, H. (1994). Cognitive style and attitudes to work. Human Relations, 47, 1509-1521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gini, A. (1998). Working ourselves to death: Workaholism, stress, and fatigue. Business and Society Review, 100-101, 45-46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackman, J. R., & Lawler, E. E. III. (1971). Employee reactions to job characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 55, 259-286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffi-Hofstetter, H., & Mannheim, B. (1999). Managers' coping resources, perceived organizational patterns, and responses during organizational recovery from decline. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 665-685.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, D. N. (1984). Personality Research Form manual (3rd ed.). Port Huron, MI: Research Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1986). LISREL VI: Analysis of linear structural relationships by maximum likelihood and least squares methods. Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1996). LISREL 8: User's Reference Guide (2nd ed.). Chicago: Scientific Software.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanungo, R. N. (1982). Measurement of job and work involvement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 341-349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kopelman, R. E., Greenhaus, J. H., & Connolly, T. F. (1983). A model of work, family and interrole conflict: A construct validation study. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 32, 198-215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynn, M., & Simons, T. (2000). Predictors of male and female servers' average tip earnings. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 241-252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machlowitz, M. (1980). Workaholics: Living with them, working with them. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mannheim, B., Baruch, Y., & Tal, J. (1997). Alternative models for antecedents and outcomes of work centrality and job satisfaction of high-tech personnel. Human Relations, 50, 1537-1562.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moorman, R. H., & Podsakoff, P. M. (1992). A meta-analytic review and empirical test of the potential confounding effects of social desirability response sets in organizational behaviour research. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 65, 131-149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrow, P. C., & Crum, M. R. (1998). The effects of perceived and objective safety risk on employee outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 53, 300-313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Motowidlo, S. J., Packard, J. S., & Manning, M. R. (1986). Occupational stress: Its causes and consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 618-629.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oates, W. (1971). Confessions of a workaholic: The facts about work addiction. New York: World.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organ, D. W. (1994). Personality and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Management, 20, 465-478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paterson, J. M., & O'Driscoll, M. P. (1990). An empirical assessment of Kanungo's (1982) concept and measure of job involvement. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 39, 293-306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, G. (1996). Organizational impact of workaholism: Suggestions for researching the negative outcomes of excessive work. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 1, 70-84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzo, J. R., House, R. J., & Lirtzman, S. I. (1970). Role conflict and ambiguity in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 15, 150-163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosin, H., & Korabik, K. (1995). Organizational experiences and propensity to leave: A multivariate investigation of men and women managers. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 46, 1-16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaef, A. W., & Fassel, D. (1988). The addictive organization. San Francisco: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneer, J. A., & Chanin, M. N. (1987). Manifest needs as personality predispositions to conflict-handling behavior. Human Relations, 40, 575-590.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, K. S., Moore, K. S., & Miceli, M. P. (1997). An exploration of the meaning and consequences of workaholism. Human Relations, 50, 287-314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seybold, K. C., & Salomone, P. R. (1994). Understanding workaholism: A review of causes and counseling approaches. Journal of Counseling and Development, 73(1), 4-9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, M., & Gangestad, S. (1986). On the nature of self-monitoring: Matters of assessment, matters of validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 125-139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speed, A., & Gangestad, S. W. (1997). Romantic popularity and mate preferences: A peer-nomination study. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 928-935.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T., & Robbins, A. S. (1992). Workaholism: Definition, measurement, and preliminary results. Journal of Personality Assessment, 58, 160-178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steers, R. M., & Braunstein, D. N. (1976). A behaviorally-based measure of manifest needs in work settings. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 9, 251-266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiger, J. H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 173-180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, S. A., & Parker, C. P. (1999). Predicting collective climates: Assessing the role of shared work values, needs, employee interaction and work group membership. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 1199-1218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaccaro, S. J., Foti, R. J., & Kenny, D. A. (1991). Self-monitoring and trait-based variance in leadership: An investigation of leader flexibility across multiple group situations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 308-315.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mudrack, P.E., Naughton, T.J. The Assessment of Workaholism as Behavioral Tendencies: Scale Development and Preliminary Empirical Testing. International Journal of Stress Management 8, 93–111 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009525213213

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009525213213

Navigation