Maternal and Child Health Journal

, Volume 4, Issue 3, pp 179–182 | Cite as

Changes in Intendedness During Pregnancy in a High-Risk Multiparous Population

  • Victoria L. Poole
  • Juanzetta S. Flowers
  • Robert L. Goldenberg
  • Suzanne P. Cliver
  • Sandre McNeal
Article

Abstract

Objectives: Our objectives were to determine whether pregnancy intendedness changes as the pregnancy progresses and, if so, in what direction. Methods: Intendedness questions similar to those used in the 1988 National Survey of Family Growth were administered in the second trimester of pregnancy (16–18 weeks) and again in the third trimester (30–32 weeks) to a population of 1223 low-income women who were medically at high risk. Information was also collected on characteristics identified in previous studies as being associated with intendedness. Changes in reported intendedness status were categorized as positive if the woman switched from unwanted to mistimed or intended or from mistimed to intended. Changes were categorized as negative if the woman switched from intended to mistimed or unwanted or from mistimed to unwanted. Results: Among the 436 women who reported an intended pregnancy at midpregnancy, 79.1% still reported the pregnancy as intended in late pregnancy, while 15.9% moved to mistimed and 6.4% to unwanted. Of the 601 women who reported a mistimed pregnancy in midpregnancy, 80.9% still reported it as mistimed in late pregnancy, with 13.9% switching to intended and 5.2% switching to unwanted. Of the 186 women who reported an unwanted pregnancy at midpregnancy, 62.9% remained unwanted, 30.7% switched to mistimed, and 6.4% switched to intended. Conclusions: This study indicates that intendedness is not fixed during pregnancy. Between the first and the second administration of the intendedness questions, 275 (22.5%) of the women changed their responses and the larger percentage (12.5%) changed them in a positive direction. These findings have both policy and clinical implications.

Intendedness of pregnancy pregnancy unwanted pregnancy 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    Peterson R, Moos M. Defining and measuring unintended pregnancy: Issues and concerns. Women's Health Issues 1997;7:234–40.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rosenzweig MR, Wolpin KI. Maternal expectations and ex post realization. J. Hum Resources 1993;28:205–27.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Joyce T, Kaestner R, Korenman S. The stability of pregnancy intentions and pregnancy-related maternal behaviors. Matern Child Health J 2000;4(3):171–78.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Goldenberg RL, Hoffman HJ, Cliver SP, Cutter GR, Nelson KG, Copper RL. The influence of previous low birth weight on birthweight, gestational age, and anthropometric measurements in the current pregnancy. Obstetr Gynecol 1992; 79:276–90.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Poole VL, Klerman LV, Flowers JS, Goldenberg RL, Cliver SP. Pregnancy intendedness and maternal behavior in a lowincome, high risk population. J Nurs Sci 1997;2:133–41.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brown SS, Eisenberg L, editors. The best intentions: Unintended pregnancy and the well-being of children and family. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Victoria L. Poole
    • 1
  • Juanzetta S. Flowers
    • 2
  • Robert L. Goldenberg
    • 3
  • Suzanne P. Cliver
    • 3
  • Sandre McNeal
    • 4
  1. 1.School of NursingUniversity of AlabamaBirmingham
  2. 2.School of NursingUniversity of AlabamaBirmingham
  3. 3.School of MedicineUniversity of AlabamaBirmingham
  4. 4.University of AlabamaBirmingham

Personalised recommendations