Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

From Double Bind to N-Bind: Toward a New Theory of Schizophrenia and Family Interaction

  • Published:
Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences

Abstract

Double Bind Theory has long been discredited as a viable theoretical framework to understand the relationship between schizophrenia and family interaction. Since research continues to indicate that the family environment plays a crucial role in the development and/or maintenance of the disorder, a reconsideration of the status of Double Bind is both necessary and timely. This paper utilizes a Nonlinear Dynamical Systems framework to bring the theory up to date with current dynamical thinking, and renames the resulting model N-Bind theory. The premises of N-Bind theory are discussed, and the symptoms of schizophrenia are described in light of the theory. The compatibility of N-Bind theory with the Vulnerability-Stress model is discussed, and a procedure is proposed to test the two hypotheses which postulate on different levels of analysis that Binds are more likely to occur in families with than without a schizophrenic member. Some of the implications for treatment and prevention are considered, should the theory be supported by empirical evidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Abeles, G. (1975) The double bind: Paradox in relationships. Doctoral Dissertation, Boston University.

  • Abeles, G. (1976) Researching the unresearchable: Experimentation on the double bind. In C. E. Sluzki & D. C. Ransom (Eds.) Double bind: The foundation of the communicational approach to the family. New York: Grune & Stratton. (pp. 113–149).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackerman, B. L. (1979) Relational paradox: Toward a language of interactional sequences. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 5, 29–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackerman, N. W. (1958) The psychodynamics of family life: Diagnosis and treatment of family relationships. New York: Basic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. M., Amazeen, P. G. & Beek, P. J. (1994) Local and global dynamics of social relationships. In R. R. Vallacher & A. Novak (Eds.) Dynamical systems in social psychology. (pp. 111–138). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barwise, J. & Moss, L. (1991) Hypersets. The Mathematical Intelligencer, 13, 31–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, G., Jackson, D. D., Haley, J. & Weakland, J. (1972/1956) Toward a theory of schizophrenia. In G. Bateson Steps to an ecology of the mind. New York: Ballantine. pp. 201–227. (Reprinted from Behavioral Science, 1, 251-264.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, G. (1972/1935) Culture contact and schismogenesis. In G. Bateson Steps to an ecology of the mind. New York: Ballantine. pp. 201–227. (Reprinted from Man, XXXV, Article # 199).

    Google Scholar 

  • Beakel, N.G. & Mehrabian, A. (1969) Inconsistent communication in psychopathology. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 74, 126–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bebbington, P. & Kuiper, L. (1988) Social influences on schizophrenia. In P. Bebbington & P. McGuffin (Eds.) Schizophrenia: The major issues. Oxford: Heinemann Medical Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blotchky, A. D., Tittler, B. I. & Friedman, S. (1982) The double-bind situation in families of disturbed families. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 141, 129–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G. W., Birley, J. L. T. & Wing, J. K. (1972) Influence of family life on the course of schizophrenic disorders: A replication. British Journal of Psychiatry, 121, 241–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bugenthal, D. E., Love, L. R., Kaswan, J. W. & April, C. (1971) Verbal-nonverbal conflict in parental messages to normal and disturbed children. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 77, 6–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bötz, M. R., Chamberlain, L. L. & McCowan, W. G. (1996) Strange attractors: Chaos, complexity, and the art of family therapy. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson, A. (1988) The current status of the dopamine hypothesis of schizophrenia. Neuropsychopharmacology, 1, 179–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carver, C. S. & Scheier, M. F. (1996) Perspectives on personality (4rd Ed.) Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, K. L., Kahn, R. S., Ko, G. & Davidson, M. (1991) Dopamine in schizophrenia: A review and reconceptualization. American Journal of Psychiatry, 148, 1474–1486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dush, D. M. & Brodsky, M. (1981) Effects and implications of the experimental double bind. Psychological Reports, 48, 895–900.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowles, D. C. (1980) The Three-arousal model: Implications of Gray's two-factor learning theory for heart rate, electrodermal activity, and psychopathy. Psychophysiology, 17, 87–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowles, D. C. (1992) Schizophrenia: Diathesis-stress model revisited. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 303–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottesman, I. I. (1991). Schizophrenia genesis: The origins of madness. New York: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottesman, I. I., McGuffin, P. & Farmer, A. E. (1987) Clinical genetics as clues to the “Real” genetics of schizophrenia (A decade of modest gains while playing for time). Schizophrenia Bulletin, 13, 23–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottman, J. M. (1993) The roles of conflict engagement, escalation, and avoidance in marital interaction:Alongitudinal view of five types of couples. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61, 6–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, J.A. (1972) The psychophysiological basis of introversion-extraversion:Amodification of Eysenck's theory. In V.D. Nebylitsyn & J.A. Gray (Eds.) The biological bases of individual behaviour. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. (pp. 182–205).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, J.A. (1981) Acritique of Eysenck's theory of personality. In H. J. Eysenck (Ed.) A model for personality. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, J. A. (1987) Perspectives on anxiety and impulsivity: A commentary. Journal of Research in Personality, 21, 491–509.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, J. A. (1991) The neuropsychology of temperament. In J. Strelau & A. Angleitner (Eds.) Explorations in temperament: International perspectives on theory and measurement. New York, Plenum. (pp. 105–128).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, J. A. (1998) Integrating schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 24, 249–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, J. A., Feldon, J., Rawlins, J. N. P., Helmsley, D. R. & Smith, A. D. (1991) The neuropsychology of schizophrenia [with peer commentary]. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 14, 1–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guastello, S. J., Hyde, T. & Odak, M. (1998) Symbolic dynamic patterns of verbal exchange in a creative problem solving group. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 2, 35–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guindon, J. E. (1971), Paradox, schizophrenia and the double bind hypothesis: An exploratory study. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Washington.

  • Gundersen, J. H. (1988) The theory of logical types: A cul-de-sac in communication theory. Nordisk Psykiatrisk Tidsskrift, 42, 63–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haller, K. A. (1989) The double bind: Paradox in Human Behavior. Doctoral Dissertation, Teachers College/Columbia University, Univ. Microfilms 90-02502.

  • Helmsley, D. R. (1987) An experimental psychological model for schizophrenia. In H. Häfner, W. F. Gattaz & W. Janzarik (Eds.) Search for the causes of schizophrenia. (Vol. 1, pp. 179–188). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinde, R.A. (1995) Asuggested structure for a science of relationships. Personal Relationships, 2, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, L. (1971) Deviation-amplifying processes in natural groups. In J. Haley (Ed.) Changing families. (Chap. 22). New York: Grune & Stratton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, L. (1981) Foundations of family therapy: A conceptual framework for systems change. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kavanagh, D. J. (1992) Recent developments in expressed emotion and schizophrenia. British Journal of Psychiatry, 160, 601–620.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendler, K. S. (1983) Overview: A current perspective on twin studies of schizophrenia. American Journal of Psychiatry, 140, 1413–1425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendler, K. S. (1993) Twin studies of psychiatric illness: Current status and future directions. Archives of General Psychiatry, 50, 905–915.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kety, S. S. (1988) Schizophrenic illness in the families of schizophrenic adoptees: Findings from the Danish National Sample. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 14, 217–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kety, S. S. & Ingraham, L. J. (1992) Genetic transmission and improved diagnosis of schizophrenia from pedigrees and adoptees. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 26, 247–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, S. & Dixon, M. J. (1995) Expressed emotion, family dynamics, and symptom severity in a predictive model of social adjustment for schizophrenic young adults. Schizophrenia Research, 14, 121–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingsley, V. C. (1969) The effects of the double bind conflict and sex of the experimenter on the conceptual functioning and visual discrimination of male good and poor premorbid schizophrenics. Doctoral Dissertation, New York Univ., Univ. Microfilms 70-16,078.

  • Koopmans, M. (1997a) Schizophrenia and the family: Double bind theory revisited. Dynamical Psychology. [On-line] Available: http://www.goertzel.org/dynapsyc/1997/Koopmans.html.

  • Koopmans, M. (1997b, May) Violations of equal environments assumption affect covariance structure estimates in twin comparisons. Poster session presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Society, Washington, DC.

  • Koopmans, M. (1998a) Chaos theory and the problem of change in families. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology & Life Sciences, 2, 133–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopmans, M. (1998b) Schizophrenia and the family II: Paradox and absurdity in human communication reconsidered. [On-line]Available: http://www.goertzel.org/dynapsyc/1998/Paradox.html.

  • Kringlen, E. (1991) Adoption studies in functional psychosis. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 240, 307–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laing, R. D. & Esterson, A. (1964) Sanity, madness and the family. Harmondsworth: Pelican Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemmon, E. J. (1978) Beginning logic. Indianapolis: Hackett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi-Strauss, C. (1963) Structural anthropology (Vol. 1). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi-Strauss, C. (1969) The elementary structures of kinship. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lidz, T. & Fleck, S. (1985) Schizophrenia and the family. (2nd Ed.). New York: International Universities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loeff, R. G. (1965) Differential discrimination of conflicting emotional messages by normal, delinquent, and schizophrenic adolescents. Doctoral Dissertation, Indiana University, University Microfilms No. 66-1470.

  • Marks-Tarlow, T. (1999) The self as a dynamical system. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 3, 311–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGue, M. & Gottesman, I. I. (1989) Genetic linkage in schizophrenia: Perspectives from genetic epidemiology, Schizophrenia Bulletin, 15, 453–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehrabian, A. & Wiener, M. (1967) Decoding of inconsistent communications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6, 109–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miklowitz, D. J. (1995) The evolution of family based psychopathology. In R. H. Mikesell, D. D. Lusterman, & S. H. McDaniel (Eds.) Integrating family therapy: Handbook of family psychology and systems theory. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association (pp. 183–197).

    Google Scholar 

  • Minuchin, S. & Fishman, H. C. (1981) Family therapy techniques. Cambridge, MA: Harvard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, E. H. (1977) Resolution of inconsistent attitude communications in normal and schizophrenic subjects. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 86, 41–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolis, G. & Prigogine, I. (1989) Exploring complexity: An introduction. New York: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, R. M. & Malla, A. K. (1993) Stressful life events and schizophrenia: I. A review of the research. British Journal of Psychiatry, 162, 161–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, D. H. (1972) Empirically unbinding the double bind:Areview of research and conceptual formulations. Family Process, 11, 69–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pincus, D. (2001) The Five-Rs model of family systems: A framework and methodology for the study of nonlinear self-organizing family dynamics. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 5, 139–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prigogine, I. & Stengers, I. (1984) Order out of chaos: Man's new dialogue with nature. New York: Bantam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proskauer, S. (1996, June) Feedback, chaos, and family regulation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Chaos Theory in Psychology and Life Sciences. Berkeley, CA.

  • Rierdan, J. & Brooks, R. (1977) Verbal conditioning of middle and lower socioeconomic class schizophrenics. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 86, 369–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, D. (1970) Genetic theory and abnormal behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotzien, M. K. (1989) Acritique of the double bind system: Theory, methodology, and research. Doctoral Dissertation FullerTheological Seminary, School of Psychology, Univ. Microfilms 89-24359.

  • Roy, L. & Roy, S. (1987) Does the theory of logical types inform a theory of communication? Journal of Genetic Psychology, 148, 519–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salzinger, K. (1991) What should a theory of schizophrenia be able to do? Peer commentary on Gray et al.'s Neuropsychology of schizophrenia. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 14, 44–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salzinger, K, Portnoy, S., Pisoni, D. & Feldman, R. S. (1970) The immediacy hypothesis and response-produced stimuli in schizophrenic speech. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 76, 258–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreber,D. P. (1988/1955) Memoirs ofmynervous illness. Cambridge,MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuham, A. I. (1967) The double bind hypothesis a decade later. Psychological Bulletin, 68, 409–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sluzki, C. E., Beavin, J., Tarnopolsky, A. & Verón, E. (1967) Transactional disqualification research on the double bind. Archives of General Psychiatry, 16, 494–504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E. K. (1973) The effect of double bind communication upon the state anxiety of normals. Doctoral Dissertation, University of New Mexico.

  • Smith, E. K. (1976) Effect of double-bind communication on the anxiety level of normals. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 85, 356–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tienari, P. & Wynne, L. C. (1994) Adoption studies of schizophrenia. Annals of Medicine, 26, 233–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tienari, P., Wynne, L., Moring, J., Lahti, I., Naarala, M., Sorri, A., Wahlberg, K. E., Saarento, O., Seitaama, M. Kaleva, M. & Läksy, K. (1994) The Finnish adoptive family study of schizophrenia: Implications for family research. British Journal of Psychiatry, 164 (suppl. 23), 20–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varela, F. J. (1979) Principles of biological autonomy. New York: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughn, C. E. & Leff, J. P. (1976) The influences of family and social factors on the course of psychiatric illness:A comparison of schizophrenic and depressed neurotic patients. British Journal of Psychiatry, 129, 125–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, E. F. & Diforio, D. (1997) Schizophrenia:Aneural diathesis-stress model. Psychological Review, 104, 667–685.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, M. & Koopmans, M. (1997,August) Dynamic pattern formation in families: II. Nonlinear and chaotic processes in Older-Child adoption. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Chaos Theory in Psychology and Life Sciences, Milwaukee, WI.

  • Watzlawick, P. A. (1963) A review of the double bind theory. Family Process, 2, 132–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watzlawick, P. A., Beavin, J. H. & Jackson, D. D. (1967) Pragmatics of human communication. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, A. N. & Russell, B. (1962) Principia mathematica (abridged version). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitchurch, G. & Constantine, L. (1993) Systems theory. In P. G. Boss, W. J. Doherty, R. LaRossa, W. R. Schumm, & S. K. Steinmetz (Eds.) Sourcebook of family theories and methods: A contextual approach. New York: Plenum Press. pp. 325–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wynne, L. C., Ryckoff, I. M. & Day, J. (1958) Pseudo-mutuality in the family relations of schizophrenics. Psychiatry, 21, 205–220.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. New York, NY

    Matthijs Koopmans

Authors
  1. Matthijs Koopmans
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Koopmans, M. From Double Bind to N-Bind: Toward a New Theory of Schizophrenia and Family Interaction. Nonlinear Dynamics Psychol Life Sci 5, 289–323 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009518729645

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009518729645

Search

Navigation