Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Sources of Complexity in Human Systems

  • Published:
Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences

Abstract

“Complex” is a special attribute we can give to many kinds of systems. Although it is used often as a synonym of “difficult,” it has a specific epistemological meaning, which is going to be shared by the incoming science of complexity. “Difficult” is an object which, by means of an adequate computational power, can be deterministically or stochastically predictable. On the contrary “complex” is an object which can not be predictable because of logical impossibility or because its predictability would require a computational power far beyond any physical feasibility, now and forever. For complexity refers to some observing system, it is always subjective, and thus it is defined as observed irreducible complexity. Human systems are affected by several sources of complexity, belonging to three classes, in order of descending restrictivity. Systems belonging to the first class are not predictable at all, those belonging to the second class are predictable only through an infinite computational capacity, and those belonging to the third class are predictable only through a trans-computational capacity. The first class has two sources of complexity: logical complexity, directly deriving from self-reference and Gödel's incompleteness theorems, and relational complexity, resulting in a sort of indeterminacy principle occurring in social systems. The second class has three sources of complexity: gnosiological complexity, which consists of the variety of possible perceptions; semiotic complexity, which represents the infinite possible interpretations of signs and facts; and chaotic complexity, which characterizes phenomena of nonlinear dynamic systems. The third class coincides with computational complexity, which basically coincides with the mathematical concept of intractability. Artificial, natural, biological and human systems are characterized by the influence of different sources of complexity, and the latter appear to be the most complex.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Abell, D. F. (1980). Defining the business: the starting point of strategic planning. Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvesson, M. (1993). Organizations as rhetoric: Knowledge-intensive firms and the struggle with ambiguity. Journal of Management Studies, 30/6, 997–1017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvesson, M. & Berg P. O. (1992). Corporate culture and organizational symbolism. Berlin: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, P. W., Arrow K. & Pines D. (Eds.) (1988). The economy as an evolving complex system. Reading (MA): Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnol'd, V. I. (1986). Catastrophe theory. Berlin: Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashby, R. W. (1956). An introduction to cybernetics. NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashby, R. W. (1962). Principles of the self-organizing system. In H. von Foerster & G. W. Zopf (Eds.) Principles of self-organization: The Illinois Symposium on theory and technology of self-organizing systems. London: Pergamon; reprinted In W. Buckley (Ed.) (1968). Modern systems research for the behavioral scientist. Chicago: Aldine Pub.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrow J. D. (1998). Impossibility. The limits of science and the science of limits. Oxford: Oxford UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. Chandler.

  • Bateson, G. (1980). Mind and nature. NY: Bantam Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer, S. (1959). Cybernetics and management. London: The English Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer, S. (1972). Brain of the firm. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggiero, L. (1999). Markets, hierarchies, networks, districts: A cybernetic approach. Human Systems Management,18, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggiero, L. (2000). Complexity and organization. In M. Zeleny (Eds.) The IEBM handbook of information technology in business (pp. 291–300). London: Thomson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggiero, L. (2001). Managerial action and observation: A view of relational complexity. Systemica, forthcoming.

  • Brillouin, L. (1956). Science and information. NY: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casti, J. L. (1989). Paradigms lost. NY: Avon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casti, J. L. (1994). Complexification. NY: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casti, J. L. (1996). The great Ashby. Journal of Complexity,1, 7–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaitin, G. J. (1987a). Algorithmic information theory. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaitin, G. J. (1987b). Information, randomness & incompleteness. Singapore: World Scientific.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cormen, T. H., Leiserson C. E. & Rivest R. L. (1990). Introduction to algorithms. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czarniawska-Joerges, B. (1992). Exploring complex organizations: A cultural perspective. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. (1958). Computability and unsolvability. NY: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. (Ed.) (1965). The undecidable: Basic papers on undecidable propositions, unsolvable problems and computable functions. NY: Raven Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, H. L. (1972). What computers can't do: A critique of artificial reason. NY: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, H. L. (1987). Being-in the-world: A commentary on division I of Heidegger's Being and time. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, H. L., & Dreyfus S. E. (1985). Mind over machine. NY: Macmillan/The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durlauf, S. N. (1997). Limits to science or limits to epistemology? Journal of Complexity,3, 31–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eco, U. (1979). A theory of semiotics. Bloomington: University of Indiana Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eco, U., & Sebeok T. A. (Eds.) (1983). The sign of three. Bloomington: University of Indiana Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekeland, I. (1991). Au hazard. Paris: Editions du Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foerster, von H. (1982). Observing systems. Seaside (CA): Intersystems Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foerster, von H. (1984). Principles of self-organization in a socio-managerial context. In H. Ulrich & G. J. B. Probst (Eds.). Self-organization and management of social systems (pp. 2–24). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foerster, von H., & Zopf W. (Eds.) (1962). Principles of self-organization. NY: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frost, P. J., Moore L. F., Lundberg C. C., & Martin J. (Eds.) (1985). Organizational culture. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garey, M. R. & Johnson D. S. (1979). Computers and intractability. NY: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, A. (1962). Introduction to the theory of finite-state machines. NY: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glasersfeld, von E. (1995). Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning. London: The Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleick, J. (1987). Chaos: making a new science. NY: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haken, H. (1978). Synergetics. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, N. (1991). The new scientist guide to chaos. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, von F. A. (Ed.) (1935). Collectivist economic planning. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek von F. A. (1949). Individualism and economic order. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J. H. (1995). Hidden order. Reading (MA): Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman, S. A. (1993). The origins of order. NY: Oxford UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kets de Vries, M. F. R. (1980). Organizational paradoxes: Clinical approaches to management. London: Tavistock Pub.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kets de Vries, M. F. R., & Miller D. (1984). The neurotic organization. San Francisco (CA): Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langton, C. G. (Ed.) (1988). Artificial life I. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langton, C. G. (Ed.) (1991). Artificial life II. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenneberg, E. (1969). Biological foundations of language. NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz, E. N. (1993). The essence of chaos. Seattle: University of Washington Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1984). Soziale Systeme. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1990). Essays on self-reference. NY: Columbia UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandelbrot, B. B. (1977). Fractals: Form, chance and dimension. San Francisco (CA): Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G. (1988). Decisions and organizations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G., & H. A. Simon (1958). Organizations. NY: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, H. R. (1978). Biology of language: The epistemology of reality. In G. A. Miller & E. Lenneberg (Eds.). Psychology and biology of language and thought (pp. 27–63). NY: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, H. & Varela F. (1980). Autopoiesis and cognition. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merry, U. (1995). Coping with uncertainty. Westport (CT): Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. A., & Lenneberg E. (Eds.) (1978). Psychology and biology of language and thought: Essays in honor of Eric Lenneberg. NY: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, E., & Newman J. R. (1958). Gödel's proof. NY: New York UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I. (1988). Creating organizational order out of chaos: self-renewal in Japanese firms. California Management Review,30, 57–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagels, H. (1988). The dreams of reason. NY: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, D., & Stacey R. (1994). Chaos, management and economics: The implications of nonlinear thinking. London: Institute of Economic Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C. S. (1931). Collected papers. Cambridge (MA): Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peliti, L., & Vulpiani, A. (Eds.) (1987). Measures of complexity. Berlin: Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrone, V. (1997). The coevolution of contexts and structures: the N-Form. In T. Clark (Ed.). Advancement in organizational behaviour (pp. 145–164). Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pines, D. (Ed.) (1987). Emerging syntheses in science. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Post, E. (1965). Recursive enumerable sets of positive integrals and their decision problem. In M. Davis (Ed.),The undecidable: Basic papers on undecidable propositions, unsolvable problems and computable functions. NY: Raven Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prigogine, I., & Nicolis G. (1987). Exploring complexity: An introduction. Munich: R. Piper Gmbh & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prigogine, I., & Stengers I. (1984). Order out of chaos. NY: Bantam Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purser, R. E., & S. Cabana (1998). The self-managing organization. NY: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. V. O. (1960). Word and object. Cambridge (MA).

  • Rorty, R. (1979). Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton: Princeton UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, B. (1985). Méthodologie multicritére d'aide à la décision. Paris: Economica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, B., & Vincke, P. (1981). Multicriteria analysis: Survey and new directions. European Journal of Operations Research,8, 207–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruelle, D. (1991). Chance and chaos. Princeton: Princeton UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schanker, S. G. (1988). Gödel's theorem in focus. London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. R. (1962). Meaning and speech acts. Philosophical Review,73, 43–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: an essay in the philosophy of language. London: Cambridge UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. R. (1983). Intentionality. London: Cambridge UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, C. E. (1948). Themathematical theory of communication. Bell Systems Technological Journal,27, 379–423, 623-656.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, C. E., & Weaver W. (1949). The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana and Chicago: Univ. Of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1962). The architecture of complexity. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society; reprinted in H. A. Simon (Ed.) (1969). The sciences of the artificial. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1977). Models of discovery. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1979). Models of thought. New Haven: Yale UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sims, H. P., & Gioia, D. A. (Eds.) (1986). The thinking organization. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, R. D. (1991). The chaos frontier. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, R. D. (1992). Managing the unknowable. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, R. D. (1993). Strategic management and organizational dynamics. London: Pitman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, R. D. (1995). The science of complexity: an alternative perspective for strategic change processes. Strategic Management Journal,16, 477–495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, R. D. (1996). Complexity and creativity in organizations. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Pub.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stalnaker, R. (1973). Presuppositions. Journal of Philosophical Logic,2, 447–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, D. L. (Ed.) (1988). Lectures in the sciences of complexity. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, D. L., & Nadel L. (Eds.) (1990). Lectures in complex systems. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stockmeyer, L. J., & Chandra A. K. (1979). Inherently difficult problems. Scientific American.24(5), 140–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugden, R. (1989). Spontaneous order. Journal of Economic Perspectives,3,85–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thom, R. (1972). Stabilitè structurelle et morphogenese. Paris: InterEditions S. A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thom, R. (1980). Modeles mathematiques de la morphogenese. Paris: Christian Bourgois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trakhtenbrot, B. A., & Barzin Y. M. (1973). Finite automata. Amsterdam: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turing, A. (1936). On computable numbers, with an application to the Entscheidungsproblem. Proceedings of London Mathematical Society, Vol. 42, 43; reprinted in M. Davis (Ed.) (1965). The undecidable: Basic papers on undecidable propositions, unsolvable problems and computable functions. NY: Raven Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Twomey Fosnot, C. (Ed.) (1996). Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice. NY: Teacher College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varela, F. J. (1979). Principles of biological autonomy. NY: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varela, F. G, Maturana H. R., & Uribe, R. (1974). Autopoiesis: the organization of living systems, its characterization and a model. BioSystems,5, 187–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vincke, P. (1992). Multicriteria decision-aid. NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldrop, M. M. (1992). Complexity: The emerging science at the edge of order and chaos. NY: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watzlawick, P. (Ed.), (1984). The invented reality. NY: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watzlawick, P., Beavin J. H., & Jackson D. D. (1967). Pragmatics of human communication. A study of interactional patterns, pathologies, and paradoxes. NY: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. (1969). The social psychology of organizing. Reading, MA: Newberry Award Records Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E., (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E., & Bougon M. G. (1986). Organizations as cognitive maps: charting way to success and failure. In H. P. Sims & D. A. Gioia (Eds.). The thinking organization (pp. 102–135). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiener, N. (1948). Cybernetics, or control and communication in the animal and the machine. NY: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winograd, T., & Flores F. (1986). Understanding computers and cognition: A new foundation for design. Ablex Publishing.

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophische Untersuchungen. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1969). On certainty. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock, A., & Davis M. (1978). Catastrophe theory. NY: Dutton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yovits, M. C., & Cameron S. (Eds.), (1960). Self-organizing systems. NY: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeleny, M. (1996). On the social nature of autopoietic systems. In E. L. Khalil & K. E. Boulding (Eds.). Evolution, order and complexity (pp. 122–145). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeleny, M., & Hufford K. D. (1992). The application of autopoiesis in system analysis: are autopoietic systems also social systems? International Journal of General Systems,21, 145–160.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. LUISS University, Viale Pola, 12, 00198, Rome, Italy

    Lucio Biggiero

Authors
  1. Lucio Biggiero
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Biggiero, L. Sources of Complexity in Human Systems. Nonlinear Dynamics Psychol Life Sci 5, 3–19 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009515211632

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009515211632

Search

Navigation