Skip to main content
Log in

Complexity and Change: Two "Semantic Tricks" in the Triumphant Oscillating Organization

  • Published:
Systemic Practice and Action Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article is about the effects of the semantics "complexity and change" used for intraorganizational communication about the relation between organization and environment. Our hypothesis is that communications along this semantic will have profound effects on the organization as to steering as it undermines the idea of organizational unity and establishes the future or utopia as the frame of reference for communication around steering. Our empirical findings from the development in the Danish central administration points in that direction. This is not necessarily implying organizational breakdown, however it might provide the basis for "oscillocracy" that is steering through acceleration of communicative flexibility and ambiguity. As theoretical frame we have chosen the German sociologist Niklas Luhmann and his communicative systems theory, which is introduced at the beginning of the article. In the central part, we present our empirical findings and at the end of the article we reflect upon oscillation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersen, N. Å. (1994). Forvaltningspolitikkens udvikling. In Lægreid, P. and Pedersen, O. K. (eds.), Forvaltningspolitik i Norden, Jurist-og Økonomforbundets Forlag, Copenhagen, pp. 29–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, N. Å. (1995). Selvskabt forvaltning, Nyt fra Samfundsvidenskaberne, Copenhagen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, N. Å. (1997). Udlicitering—Strategi og historie, Nyt fra Samfundsvidenskaberne, Copenhagen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, N. Å. (1999). Politisk administration. In Torfing, J. (eds.). Diskursteorien på arbejde, Roskilde Universitets Forlag, Roskilde, pp. 71–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, N. Å. (2000). Public market—Political firms. Acta Sociol., forthcoming.

  • Andersen, N. Å, and Born, A. (1997). Complexity and “the love of learning and the desire for God,” a defence for the oscillocratic organization. In Proceedings from the Conference Organizing in a Multivoiced World, Leuven, Belgium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, N. Å, and Kjaer, P. (1996). Institutional construction and change: An analytical strategy of institutional history. COS rapport nr. 5/1996, CBS. DK ISSN 0903-6695.

  • Beck, U. (1986). Risikogesellschaft, Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne. Suhrkamp Frankfurt a.M.

  • Born, A., and Goldschmidt, L. (1997). Legal regulation and communicative couplings. Law Policy, 19(1), 23–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crozier, M., and Friedberg, E. (1977). L'acteur et le Système. Éditions du Seuil, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1980). The History of Sexuality. Vintage Books, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1972). The Archaeology of Knowledge. Tavistock Publications, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koselleck, R. (1982). Begriffgeschichte and social history. Economy Soc., 11(4) p 409–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koselleck, R. (1985a). “Space of Experience” and “Horizon of Expectation”: Two historical categories. In Koselleck, R. (ed.), Future Past, The MIT Prss, London, pp. 267–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koselleck, R. (1985b). The historical-political semantics of asymmetric counterconcepts. In Koselleck, R. (ed.), Future Past, The MIT Press, London, pp. 159–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1971). Politische Planung. Aufsätze zur Sociologie von Politik und Verwaltung. Westdeutscher Verlag Opladen, Bielefeld.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1982a). The self-thematization of society. In Luhmann, N. (ed.), The Differentiation of Society, Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 327–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1982b). World-time and system history. In Luhmann, N. 9ed.), The Differentiation of Society, Columbia University Press, New York, p. 307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1985). Complexity and meaning. In Aida, S., et al. (eds.), The Science and Praxis of Complexity, Tokyo, The United Nations University, p. 99–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1990). Meaning as sociology's basic concept. Essays on Self-Reference, Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 21–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1991). Die form “person”. Soziale Welt 42, Universität Barmberg, Barmberg, pp. 166–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1993a). Deconstruction as second-order observing. New Literary History, 24, 763–782.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1993b). Gesellschaftsstruktur und Semantik, Band I, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main, pp. 9–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1993c). Risk a Sociological Theory, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1995). Social Systems. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1997a). Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1997b). Limits of steering. Theory, Culture Society. 14(1), 41–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, K., and Pedersen, O. K. (1991). From the mixed economy to the negotiated economy: The Scandinavian countries. In Coughlin, R. M. (eds.), Morality, Rationality, and Efficiency, New Perspectives on Socio-Economics, M. E. Sharpe, New York, pp. 145–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, O. K. (1993). The institutional history of the Danish polity. From a market-and mixed-to a negotiated economy. In Sjøstrand, Sv.E., (eds.): Institutional Change: Theories and Empirical Finding, M. E. Sharpe, New York, pp. 277–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, R. A. W., and March, D. (1992). New Directions in the study of Policy Networks. Europ. J. Political Res. 21(1—2), 181–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teubner, G. (1983). Substantive and reflexive elements in modern law. Law Society Rev. 2, 239–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teubner, G. (1992). Social order from legislative noise: Autopoietic closure as a problem for legal regulation. In Teubner, G., and Febbrajo, A. (eds.), State Law and Economy as Autopoietic Systems: Regulation and Autonomy in a New, European Yearbook in the Sociology of Law, vol. 1991—1992, Dott. A. Fuiffré Editore, Milano, pp. 609–649.

  • Willke, H. (1992). Societal guidance through law?. In Teubner, G. and Febbrajo, A., (eds.), State Law and Economy as Autopoietic Systems: Regulation and Autonomy in a New, European Yearbook in the Sociology of Law, vol. 1991—1992, Dott. A. Guiffré Editore, Milano, pp. 353–387.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Andersen, N.Å., Born, A.W. Complexity and Change: Two "Semantic Tricks" in the Triumphant Oscillating Organization. Systemic Practice and Action Research 13, 297–328 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009511026806

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009511026806

Navigation