Skip to main content
Log in

Multicomponent Intervention for Work-Related Upper Extremity Disorders

  • Published:
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although several multidimensional models have emerged to explain the development, exacerbation and maintenance of work-related upper extremity disorders and disability, there is a paucity of data on the application of these models for the development of worksite-based prevention and management programs. Sign language interpreting is an occupation associated with increased risk for upper extremity symptoms. Ergonomic, work organization, work style, and work-related and individual psychosocial factors have been demonstrated to play a role in the exacerbation of symptoms and lost time in this group. Therefore, it was hypothesized that an intervention directed at reducing the impact of these factors would be associated with reductions in the number of upper extremity cases/year and associated lost time and health care costs in a group of full-time sign language interpreters. Subjects included 53 symptomatic and asymptomatic interpreters working at the National Technical Institute for the Deaf. The intervention (eleven 1.5-hr group sessions) was designed to 1) reduce musculoskeletal overexertion by reducing workload and biomechanical strain, while increasing flexibility and endurance through tailored exercise and preinterpreting “warm ups,” 2) improve the ability of workers to manage job stress and musculoskeletal pain, 3) reduce biomechanical exposure through work organization and work style changes, 4) alter organizational sources of stress by improving supervisor's managerial skills to address work related upper extremity problems and provide increased supervisor support, and 5) educate workers and supervisors regarding the optimal utilization of health care resources, given the present state of the art in terms of clinical evaluation and management. Results indicated a 69% reduction in the number of cases reporting upper extremity problems in the 3 years following the intervention. Indemnity costs were reduced by 64% and were maintained over the next 2 years. Health care costs followed a similar, although smaller magnitude, change. Despite this reduction, a partial rebound in all outcome measures was observed in Year 3 postintervention. This rebound followed a progressive increase in workload over the 3-year follow-up period.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Armstrong TJ, Buckle P, Fine LJ, Hagberg M, Jonsson B, Kilbom A, Kuorinta IAA, Silverstein BA, Sjogaard G, Viikari-Juntura ERA. Aconceptual model forwork-related neck and upper-limb musculoskeletal disorders. Scand J Work Environ Health 1993; 19: 73–84.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bongers PM, deWinter CR, Kompier MAJ, Hildebrandt VH. Psychosocial factors atwork and musculoskeletal disease. Scand J Work Environ Health 1993; 19: 297–312.

    Google Scholar 

  3. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. In: Bernard, BP ed. Musculoskeletal disorders and workplace factors: A critical review of epidemiological evidence for work-related musculoskeletal disorders of the neck, upper extremity, and low back. DHHS (NIOSH) Pub No. 97-141, 1997.

  4. DeCaro JJ, Feuerstein M, Hurwitz A. Cumulative trauma disorders among educational interpreters: Contributing factors and intervention. Am Ann Deaf 1992; 137: 288–292.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Feuerstein M, Burrell LM, Carosella AM, Marshall L, DeCaro J. Occupational upper extremity symptoms in sign language interpreters: Prevalence and correlates of pain, function, and work disability. J Occup Rehab 1997; 7: 187–205.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Stedt JD. Interpreter's wrist: Repetitive stress injury and carpal tunnel syndrome in sign language interpreters. Am Ann Deaf 1992; 137: 40–43.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sweeney MH, Petersen M, O'Neill V. Health hazard and technical assistance report: Registry of Interpreters for the Deaf, Ohio Chapter. NIOSH Report No. HHE 92-0268-2477. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, OH.

  8. Cohn L, Lowry RM, Hart S. Overuse syndromes of the upper extremity in interpreters for the deaf. Orthopedics1990; 13: 207–209.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Shealy J, Feuerstein M, Latko W. Biomechanical analysis of upper extremity risk in sign language interpreting. J Occup Rehab 1991; 1: 217–225.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Feuerstein M, Fitzgerald TE. Biomechanical factors affecting upper extremity cumulative trauma disorders in sign language interpreters. J Occup Med 1992; 34: 257–264.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hales TR, Sauter SL, Peterson MR, Fine LJ, Putz-Anderson V, Schleifer LR, Ochs TT, Bernard BP. Musculoskeletal disorders among visual display terminal users in a teleconmmnications company. Ergonomics1994; 37: 1603–1621.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Faucet J, Rempel D. VDT-related musculoskeletal symptoms: Interactions between workposture and psychosocial work factors. Am J Ind Med 1994; 26: 597–612.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Polanyi MFD, Cole DC, Beaton DE, et al. Upper limb work-related musculoskeletal Disorders among newspaper employees: Cross-sectional survey results. Am J Ind Med. 1997; 32: 620–628.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Feuerstein M. Workstyle: Definition, empirical support and implications for prevention, evaluation and rehabilitation of occupational upper extremity disorders. In: Moon S, Sauter S, eds. Beyond biomechanics: Psychosocial influences on cumulative trauma disorders in office workers. London: Taylor and Francis, 1996, pp. 177–206.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Feuerstein M, Huang G, Pransky G. Workstyle and work-related upper extremity disorders. In: Gatchel RJ, Turk DC, eds. Psychosocial factors in pain. New York: Guilford, 1999, pp. 175–192.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Grant K, Habes D. Summary of studies of the effectiveness of ergonomic interventions. Appl Occup Environ Hyg 1995; 10: 523–530.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Linton SI. A behavioral workshop for training immediate supervisors: The key to neck and back injuries? Percep Motor Skills 1991; 73: 1159–1170.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Westgaard RH, Winkel J. Ergonomic intervention research for improved musculoskeletal health: A critical review. Int J Indust Ergon 1997; 20: 463–500.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Smith MJ, Karsh BT, Moro FBP. A review of research on interventions to control musculoskeletal disorders. In National Research Council, Work-related musculoskeletal disorders. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Feuerstein M, Callen-Harris S, Hickey P, Fitzgerald T, Onufryk F, Armbruster W. Repetitive motion disorders: Prevention and management in sign language interpreters. The University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Feuerstein M, Jones RH. A comprehensive multidisciplinary approach to the evaluation, rehabilitation and prevention of repetitive motion disorders in sign language interpreters. Unpublished Report, The University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Davis M, Eshelman ER, McKay M. The relaxation and stress reduction workbook (4th Ed.). Oakland, California: New Harbinger Publications, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Melzack R, Wall PD. Evolution of pain theories. Int Anesthesiol Clin 1970; 8: 3–34.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Feuerstein, M., Marshall, L., Shaw, W.S. et al. Multicomponent Intervention for Work-Related Upper Extremity Disorders. J Occup Rehabil 10, 71–83 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009493813003

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009493813003

Navigation