Journal of Genetic Counseling

, Volume 9, Issue 2, pp 95–116 | Cite as

The Role of Expectations in Effective Genetic Counseling

  • Lisa R. Jay
  • Walid A. Afifi
  • Wendy Samter


The goals for this investigation were to assess individuals' expectations for social support from genetic counselors, and to explore how these expectations influence perceptions of genetic counselor effectiveness. Two studies were conducted to address these goals. Results from the first study show that individuals most frequently expect genetic counselors to provide options and support following the disclosure of distressing test results, while data from the second study demonstrate that expectations play a significant role in individuals' assessment of genetic counselor effectiveness. These findings shed light on what individuals expect from genetic counselors following the disclosure of medically positive test results and inform how these expectations influence the success of genetic counseling sessions.

genetic counseling social support expectations 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abbey A, Halman LJ (1995) The role of perceived control, attribution, and meaning in members' of infertile couples well being. J Soc Clin Psychol 14:271–296.Google Scholar
  2. Albrecht TL, Adelman MB (eds) (1987) Communicating Social Support. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  3. Arnos KS, Israel J, Cunningham M (1991) Genetic counseling for the deaf: Medical cultural considerations. Ann NY Acad Sci 630:212–222.Google Scholar
  4. Averill JR (1973) Personal control over aversive stimuli and its relationship to stress. Psychol Bull 80:286–303.Google Scholar
  5. Bandura A (1977) Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev 84:191–215Google Scholar
  6. Bandura A (1986) Social Foundations of Thought and Action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  7. Barbee AP, Gulley MR, Cunningham MR (1990) Support seeking in close relationships. J Soc Per Relationship 7:531–540.Google Scholar
  8. Berkenstadt M, Shiloh S, Barkai G, Katznelson MB, Goldman, B (1999) Perceived personal control (PPC): A new concept in measuring outcome of genetic counseling. Am J Med Genet 82:53–59.Google Scholar
  9. Buller DB, Street, RL, Jr. (1992) Physician-patient relationships. In: Feldman RS (ed) Applications of Nonverbal Behavioral Theories and Research. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp 119–141.Google Scholar
  10. Burgoon J (1978) A communication model of personal space violations: Explication and an initial test. Hum Commun Res 4:129–142.Google Scholar
  11. Burgoon J (1983) Nonverbal violations of expectations. In: Weimann J, Harrison R (eds) Nonverbal Interaction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp 77–111.Google Scholar
  12. Burgoon J (1995) Cross cultural and intercultural applications of expectancy violations theory. In: Wiseman R (ed) Intercultural Communication Theory. London: Sage, pp 194–214.Google Scholar
  13. Burgoon J, Hale J (1988) Nonverbal expectancy violations: Model elaboration and application to immediacy behaviors. Commun Monogr 55:58–79.Google Scholar
  14. Burgoon J, Jones SB (1976) Toward a theory of personal space expectations and their violations. Hum Commun Res 2:131–146.Google Scholar
  15. Burgoon J, Walther J (1990) Nonverbal expectancies and the evaluative consequences of violations. Hum Commun Res 14:232–265.Google Scholar
  16. Burgoon J, Walther J, Baesler EJ (1992) Interpretations, evaluations, and consequences of interpersonal touch. Hum Commun Res 19:237–263.Google Scholar
  17. Burgoon M, Birk T, Hall J (1991) Compliance and satisfaction with physician-patient communication: An expectancy theory interpretation of gender differences. Hum Commun Res 18:177–208.Google Scholar
  18. Burleson BR (1983) Social cognition, empathic motivation, and adults' comforting strategies. Hum Commun Res 10:295–304.Google Scholar
  19. Burleson BR (1984) Comforting communication. In: Sypher HE, Applegate JL (eds) Communication by Children and Adults: Social Cognitive and Strategic Processes. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp 63–104.Google Scholar
  20. Canary DJ, Emmers-Sommer TM (1997) Sex and Gender Differences in Personal Relationships. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  21. Canary DJ, Hause, KS (1993) Is there any reason to research sex differences in communication? Commun Q 41:129–144.Google Scholar
  22. Fraser FC (1974) Genetic counseling. Am J Hum Genet 26:636–659.Google Scholar
  23. Glass SP, Wright TL (1986) Sex differences in type of extramarital involvement and marital dissatisfaction. Sex Roles 12:1101–1120.Google Scholar
  24. Hall J, Briton N (1993) Gender, nonverbal behavior and expectations. In: Blanck P (ed) Interpersonal Expectations. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp 276–295.Google Scholar
  25. House JS (1981) Work, Stress and Social Support. MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  26. Jackson SA (1992). Message Effects Research: Principles of Design and Analysis. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  27. Johns Hopkins University and National Center for Human Genome Research (1997) Genetic Counseling Graduate Program [brochure].Google Scholar
  28. Kalbfleisch PJ, Cody MJ (1995) Gender, Power, and Communication in Human Relationships. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  29. Kessler S (1997) Psychological aspects of genetic counseling. IX. Teaching and counseling. J Genet Couns 6:287–295.Google Scholar
  30. Lea D (1996) Emerging quality improvement measures in genetic counseling. J Genet Couns 5:123–137.Google Scholar
  31. Michie S, Marteau T, Bobrow M (1997) Genetic counseling: The psychological impact of meeting patient's expectations. J Med Genet 34:237–241.Google Scholar
  32. Mishel MH (1990) Reconceptualization of the uncertainty in illness theory. Image J Nurs Sch 22:256–262.Google Scholar
  33. National Society of Genetic Counselors (1993) A Voice, a Resource, and an Educational Environment for the Genetic Counseling Profession [brochure].Google Scholar
  34. National Society of Genetic Counselors (1994) A Voice, a Resource, and an Educational Environment for the Genetic Counseling Profession [brochure].Google Scholar
  35. Oakley A, Hickley D, Rajan L (1996) Social support in pregnancy: Does it have long-term effects? J Reprod Inf Psychol 14:7–22.Google Scholar
  36. Pearson R (1990) Counseling and Social Support. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  37. Samter W, Burleson BR, Basden-Murphy L (1989) Behavioral complexity is in the eye of the beholder: Effects of cognitive complexity and message complexity on impressions of the source of comforting messages. Hum Commun Res 15:612–629.Google Scholar
  38. Samter W, Whaley BB, Mortenson ST, Burleson BR (1997) Ethnicity and emotional support in samesex friendship: A comparison of Asian-Americans, African-Americans, and Euro-Americans. Per Relationship 4:413–430.Google Scholar
  39. Shiloh S, Avdor O, Goodman RM (1990) Satisfaction with genetic counseling: Dimensions and measurement. Am J Med Genet 37:522–529.Google Scholar
  40. Stewart F (1991) Genetic counseling. In: Davis H, Fallowfield L (eds) Counseling and Communication in Health Care. Chichester, England: Wiley, pp 193–207.Google Scholar
  41. Waggoner WC, Mayo DM (1996) Who understands? A survey of 25 words or phrases commonly used in proposed clinical research consent forms. IRB Rev Hum Subj Res 17:6–9.Google Scholar
  42. Wertz D (1994) Provider gender and moral reasoning: The politics of “an ethics of healthcare.” J Genet Couns 3:95–112.Google Scholar
  43. Wertz D, Fletcher J (1988) Attitudes of genetic counselors: A multinational survey. Am J Hum Genet 42:592–600.Google Scholar
  44. White-Van Mourik M, Connor JM, Ferguson-Smith MA(1992) The psychosocial sequelae of a second trimester termination of pregnancy for fetal abnormality over a two year period. Birth Defects 28(1):61–74.Google Scholar
  45. Wolff G, Walter W (1992) Attitudes of at-risk persons for Huntington's Disease toward predictive genetic testing. Birth Defects 28(1):119–126.Google Scholar
  46. Zare N, Sorenson JR, Heeren T (1984) Sex of provider as a variable in effective genetic counseling. Soc Sci Med 19:671–675.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© National Society of Genetic Counselors, Inc. 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lisa R. Jay
    • 1
    • 2
  • Walid A. Afifi
    • 3
  • Wendy Samter
    • 4
  1. 1.Genetic Counseling ProgramBeaver CollegeGlenside
  2. 2.Cherry Hill
  3. 3.Department of Speech CommunicationThe Pennsylvania State UniversityUniversity Park
  4. 4.Department of CommunicationUniversity of DelawareNewark

Personalised recommendations