Abstract
We present selected initial results from a study investigating the effects of school restructuring and reform activities on outcomes for students who are identified as having serious emotional and behavioral disabilities. A review of the literature revealed six key areas of reform for investigation: accountability, governance, parent involvement, “includedness,” curriculum and instruction, and pro-social discipline. Ten schools (five elementary, two K-8, one middle, and two high schools) actively engaged in school restructuring and reform efforts were selected to participate in the study, and their status related to these six areas is presented. Characteristics of the students identified as having emotional and behavioral disabilities and served in these schools in special education settings (N = 116) are described. Results from the administration of standardized assessments revealed that these students have significant levels of emotional and behavioral disabilities that impair their functioning at school and at home. Further, school staff are providing the majority of counseling services to these students during the school day, with non-school professionals providing services to 25% of the students.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Achenbach, T. M. (1985). Assessment and taxonomy of child and adolescent psychopathology. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Achenbach, T. M. (1991). Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist/4–18 and 1991 profile. Burlington: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry.
Ascher, B. H., Farmer, E. M. Z., & Burns, B. J. (1996). The Child and Adolescent Services Assessment (CASA): Description and psychometrics. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 4, 12–20.
Boyer, E. L. (1983). High school: A report on American secondary education. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
Burns, B. J., Angold, A., Magruder-Habib, K., Costello, E. J., & Patrick, M. K. S. (1996). The Child and Adolescent Services Assessment (CASA) Manual. Durham, Duke University Medical Center, Developmental Epidemiology Program.
Burns, B. J., Costello, E. J., Angold, A., Tweed, D., Stangl, D., Farmer, E. M. Z., & Erkanli, A. (1995). Children's mental health service use across service sectors. Health Affairs, 14, 147–159.
Cullinan, D., Epstein, M. H., & Sabornie, E. J. (1992). Selected characteristics of a national sample of serious emotionally disturbed adolescents. Behavior Disorders, 17, 273–280.
Danielson, L. C., & Malouf, D. B. (1994). Federal policy and educational reform: Achieving better outcomes for students with disabilities. Special Services in the Schools, 9 (2), 11–19.
Dedrick, R. F., Greenbaum, P. E., Friedman, R. M., Wetherington, C. M., & Knoff, H. (1997). Testing the structure of the Child Behavior Checklist /4–18 Using confirmatory factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 306–313.
Duchnowski, A. J., Hall, K. S., Kutash, K., & Friedman, R. M. (1998). The alternatives to residential treatment study. In M. H. Epstein, K. Kutash, & A. Duchnowski (Eds.), Outcomes for children and youth with behavioral and emotional disorders and their families: Programs and evaluation best practices (pp. 55–80). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
Educational Testing Service Policy Information Center. (1990). The education reform decade. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Epstein, M. H., & Sharma, J. (1997). Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale: A strength-based approach to assessment. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
Farmer, E. M. Z., Angold, A., Burns, B. J., & Costello, E. J. (1994). Reliability of self-reported service use: Test-retest consistency of children's responses to the Child and Adolescent Services Assessment (CASA). Journal of Child and Family Studies, 3, 307–325.
Federal Register. (1998, July 17). 63(137), 38661–38665.Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Friedman, R. M., Kutash, K., & Duchnowski, A. J. (1997). The population of concern: Defining issues. In B. Stroul (Ed.), Children's mental health: Creating systems of care in a changing society (pp. 69–96). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
Goodlad, J. I. (1983). A place called school: Prospects for the future. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Greenbaum, P. E., Dedrick, R. F., Friedman, R. M., Kutash, K., Brown, E. C., Lardieri, S. P., & Pugh, A. M. (1998). National adolescent and child treatment study (NACTS): Outcomes for children with emotional and behavioral disturbance. In M. H. Epstein, K. Kutash, & A. J. Duchnowski (Eds.), Outcomes for children and youth with behavioral and emotional disorders and their families: Programs and evaluation best practices (pp. 21–54). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
Hodges, K. (1994). Child and Adolescent Functional Assessment Scale-Parent report. Ypsilanti: Eastern Michigan University, Department of Psychology.
Hodges, K. (1995). Child and Adolescent Functional Assessment Scale Self Training Manual. Unpublished manuscript. Ypsilanti: Eastern Michigan University.
Hodges, K., Bickman, L., Kurtz, S., & Reiter, M. (1991). A multi-dimensional measure of level of functioning for children and adolescents. In A. Algarin & R. M. Friedman (Eds.), Fourth annual research conference proceedings: A system of care for children's mental health: Expanding the research base (pp. 149–154). Tampa: University of South Florida, Research and Training Center for Children's Mental Health, Florida Mental Health Institute.
Hodges, K., Lambert, W., & Summerfelt, W. T. (1994, March). Validity of a measure to assess impairment: The child and adolescent functional assessment scale (CAFAS). Paper presented at the Seventh Annual Research Conference. A system of care for children's mental health: Expanding the research base, Tampa FL.
Hodges, K., & Wong, M. M. (1996). Psychometric characteristics of a multidimensional measure to assess impairment: The Child and Adolescent Functional Assessment Scale. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 5, 445–467.
Hodges, K., & Wong, M. M. (1997). Use of the Child and Adolescent Functional Assessment Scale to predict service utilization and cost. The Journal of Mental Health Administration, 24, 278–290.
Hodges, K., Wong, M. M., & Latessa, M. (1998). Use of the Child and Adolescent Functional Assessment Scale (CAFAS) as an outcome measure in clinical settings. The Journal of Behavioral Health Sciences and Research, 25, 325–335.
Knitzer, J., Steinberg, Z., & Fleisch, B. (1990). At the schoolhouse door: An examination of programs and policies for children with behavioral and emotional problems. New York: Bank Street College of Education.
Koyanagi, C., & Gaines, S. (1993). All systems failure: An examination of the results of neglecting the needs of children with serious emotional disturbance. Alexandria, VA: National Mental Health Association.
Kumen, S., Overstreet, S., & Salles, C. (1996). Concurrent validity study of the Slosson Intelligence Test-Revised in mental retardation testing. Mental Retardation, 34, 380–386.
Lloyd, J., Singh, N., & Repp, A. (Eds.). (1991). The regular education initiative: Alternative perspectives on concepts, issues, and models. Sycamore, IL: Sycamore Publishing Company.
Marder, C. (1992, April). Secondary school students classified as seriously emotionally disturbed: How are they being served? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 369 232)
National Center for Education Statistics. (1994). Mini-digest of education statistics, 1994. Washington, DC: Author.
National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
Nicholson, C. L., & Hibpshman, T. L. (1990a). Manual for the Slosson Intelligence Test-Revised. East Aurora, NY: Slosson Educational Publication.
Nicholson, C. L., & Hibpshman, T. L. (1990b). Slosson Intelligence Test-Revised (norms, tables & technical manual). East Aurora, NY: Slosson Educational Publications.
Paul, J. L., Rosselli, H., & Evans, D. (Eds.). (1995). Integrating school restructuring and special education reform. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace & Company.
Sailor, W. (1991). Special education in the restructured school. Remedial and Special Education, 12(6), 8–22.
Sailor, W., Anderson, J. L., Halvorsen, A. T. Doering, K., Filler, J., & Goetz, L. (1989). The comprehensive local school: Regular education for all students with disabilities. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Company.
Smith, T. D., Smith, B. L., & Smithson, M. M. (1995). The relationship between the WISC-III and the WRAT 3 in a sample of rural referred children. Psychology in the Schools, 32, 291–295.
Twentieth Century Fund, Task Force on Federal Elementary and Secondary Education. (1983). Making the grade. New York: Author.
U.S. Department of Education. (1990). America 2000: An education strategy. Sourcebook. Washington, DC: General Accounting Office.
U.S. Department of Education. (1995). Seventeenth annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
U.S. Department of Education. (1996). Eighteenth annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Vance, B., & Fuller, G. (1995). Relationship of scores on the WISCII and WRAT 3 for a sample of referred children and youth. Psychological Reports, 76, 371–374.
Wang, M. C., & Birch, J. (1984). Comparison of a full-time mainstreaming program and a resource room approach. Exceptional Children, 51, 33–40.
Wilkinson, G. S. (1993). The Wide Range Achievement Test (3rd ed.). Wilmington, DE: Wide Range.
Will, M. (1986). Educating children with learning problems: A shared responsibility. Exceptional Children, 52, 411–416.
Yin, R. K. (1993). Case study research: Design and methods, (Rev. ed.) Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kutash, K., Duchnowski, A.J., Robbins, V. et al. The School and Community Study: Characteristics of Students Who Have Emotional and Behavioral Disabilities Served in Restructuring Public Schools. Journal of Child and Family Studies 9, 175–190 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009466921066
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009466921066