Abstract
Purpose: The objective was to determine the optimal insemination technique in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) after failed direct intraperitoneal insemination (DIPI) and the outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in such cases.
Methods: In case–control studies, 53 couples with unexplained infertility who underwent IVF after four failed DIPI cycles were compared with 75 couples with tubal or endometriosis infertility as controls. Thirty couples with unexplained infertility after failing to conceive with DIPI and conventional IVF who underwent ICSI and 58 couples with male-factor infertility as controls also were compared. Fertilization cleavage, embryo quality, implantation, and pregnancy were compared after IVF and after ICSI.
Results: There was a significant difference in fertilization rates after IVF between cases of unexplained infertility after failing to conceive with DIPI (40.4%) and patients with tubal or endometriosis infertility (67.9%). There also was a significant difference in total fertilization failure rates between the two groups (30.4% and 3.9%, respectively). There was a slight but significant difference in numbers of fertilized oocytes after ICSI between patients with low fertilization rate undergoing IVF after failing to conceive DIPI (85.8%) and patients with male factor (90.4%). Total fertilization failure was not observed in these cases.
Conclusions: Couples with unexplained infertility after failing to conceive with DIPI show a failed fertilization or a low fertilization rate after IVF. However, they demonstrated a good chance of becoming pregnant after subsequent ICSI, even with statistically significant difference in fertilization rate as compared with male-factor cases.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Collins J, Crosignani P: Unexplained infertility: A review of diagnosis, prognosis, treatment efficacy, and management. Int J Obstet Gynecol 1992;39:267-275
Crosignani PG, Lauretis LD, Ragni G, Olivares MD, Finzi G, Perotti L: Intraperitoneal insemination in the treatment of male and unexplained infertility. Fertil Steril 1991;55:333-337
Turhan NO, Artini PG, Ambrogio G, Droghini F, Volpe A, Genazzani AR: Studies on direct intraperitoneal insemination in the management of male factor, cervical factor, unexplained and immunological infertility. Hum Reprod 1992;7(1):66-71
Minoura M, Takeuchi S, Xiaoxiong S, Shibahara T, Fumamura N, Toyoda N: Increasing the pregnancy rate after combined treatment with hMG/hCG and direct intraperitoneal insemination. J Reprod Med 1999;44(1):18-22
Gurgan T, Urman B, Yarali H, Kisnisci HA: The results of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer in couples with unexplained infertility failing to conceive with superovulation and intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril 1995;64:93-97
Ruiz A, Guanes PP, Remohi J, Simon C, Minguez Y, Pellicer A: The role of in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection in couples with unexplained infertility after failed intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril 1997;68:171-173
World Health Organization. Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Semen and Semen Cervical Mucus Interaction, 3rd ed. New York, Cambridge University Press, 1993, 43-44
Kimura Y, Yanagimachi R: Intracytoplasmic sperm injection in the mouse. Biol Reprod 1995;52:709-720
Aboulghar MA, Mansour RT, Serour GI, Amin Y, Abbas AM, Salash IM: Ovarian superstimulation and intrauterine insemination for the treatment of unexplained infertility. Fertil Steril 1993;60:303-306
Kahn JA, Sunde A, During VV, Sordal T, Molne K: Treatment of unexplained infertility, fallopian tube sperm perfusion (FSP). Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1993;72:193-199
Asch RH, Balmaceda JP, Ellsworth LR, Wong PC: Preliminary experience with gamate intrafallopian transfer (GIFT). Fertil Steril 1986;45:366-
Audibert F, Hedon B, Arnal F: Results of IVF attempts in patients with unexplained infertility. Hum Reprod 1989;4: 766-771
Tomas C, Orava M, Tuomivaara L, Martikainen H. Low pregnancy rate is achieved in patients treated with intracytoplasmic sperm injection due to previous low or failed fertilization in in vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 1998;13:65-70
Miller K, Falcone T, Goldberg JM, Attaran M: Previous fertilization failure with conventional in vitro fertilization is associated with poor outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm infection. Fertil Steril 1998;69:242-206
Tesarik J, Sousa M, Testart J: Human oocyte activation after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod 1994;9: 511-518
Gabrielsen A, Petersen K, Mikkelsen AL, Lindenberg S: Intracytoplasmic sperm injection does not overcome an oocyte defect in previous fertilization failure with conventional in vitro fertilization and normal spermatozoa Hum Reprod 1996;11: 1963-1965
Svalander P, Forsberg AS, Jakobsson AH, Wikland M: Factors of importance for the establishment of a successful program of intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment for male infertility. Fertil Steril 1995;63:828-837
Munne S, Alikani M, Tomkin G, Grifo J, Cohen J: Embryo morphology, developmental rates, and maternal age are correlated with chomosome abnormalities. Fertil Steril 1995;64: 382-391
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Takeuchi, S., Minoura, H., Shibahara, T. et al. In Vitro Fertilization and Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection for Couples with Unexplained Infertility After Failed Direct Intraperitoneal Insemination. J Assist Reprod Genet 17, 515–520 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009445909023
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009445909023