Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Medical Management and Rehabilitation in the Workplace: Emerging Issues

  • Editorial Commentary
  • Published:
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. BLS. The employment situation: January 2000. USDL 00-34, Bureau of Labor Statistics, United States Department of Labor, Washington, DC, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kraus L, Stoddard S, Gilmartin D. Chartbook on disability in the United States. U.S. Department of Education #H133D50017, National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research Washington, DC, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  3. LaPlante M, Kennedy J, Kaye S, Wnger B, Disability Statistics Abstract–Disability and Employment #11, San Francisco Disability Stastistics Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA, 1997. (http://dsc.ucsf.edu/abs/ab11.html)

    Google Scholar 

  4. BLS. Lost-worktime injuries and illnesses: Characteristics and resulting time away from work, 1997. USDL 99-102, Bureau of Labor Statistics, United States Department of Labor, Washington, DC, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Armstrong T, Buckle P, Fine L, Hagberg M, Jonsson B, Kilbom A, Kourinka I, Silverstein B, Sjogaard G, Viikari-Juntura E. A conceptual model for work-related neck and upper limb disorders, Scand J Work En Health 1993; 19(2): 74–84.

    Google Scholar 

  6. OSHA. Section 5: Duties, occupational safety and health act of 1970. Public Law 91-596, US DOL 1970.

  7. OSHA. Ergonomics Program; Proposed Rule. Federal Register 1999; 64(225): 65768–66078.

    Google Scholar 

  8. McKenzie F, Storment J, Van Hook P, Armstrong T. A program for control of repetitive trauma disorders associated with hand tool operations in a telecommunications manufacturing facility. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1985; 46(11): 674–678.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Oxenburgh M. Cost-benefit analysis of ergonomics programs. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1997; 58(2): 150–156.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jones R. Corporate ergonomics program at a large poultry processor. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1997; 58(2): 132–137.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mansfield J, Armstrong T. Library of Congress workplace ergonomics program. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1997; 58(2): 138–144.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Moore S, Garg A. Participatory ergonomics in a red meat packing plant, Part I: Evidence of long-term effectiveness. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1997; 58(2): 127–131.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bernacki E, Guidera J, Schaefer J, Lavin R, Tsai S. An ergonomics designed to reduce the incidence of upper extremity work related musculoskeletal disorders. J Occ Env Med 1999; 41(12): 1032–1041.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Feuerstein M. A multidisciplinary approach to the prevention, evaluation, and management of work disability. J Occup Rehab 1991; 1(1): 5–12.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gilbert F, Gilbert L. Motion study for crippled soldiers. In: Spriegel WR, Myers CE, eds. The writings of the Gilbreths. Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin, Inc., 1953, pp. 281–288.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bridges C. Job placement of the physically handicapped. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1946.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Nieuwenhuijesen E. The ERTOMIS assessment method: An innovative job placement strategy. In: Berkowitz M, ed. Forging linkages. New York, NY: Rehabilitation International, 1990, pp. 121–156.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Weisman G. Rehabilitation engineering in theworkplace. In: Smith R, Leslie J, eds. Rehabilation engineering. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 1993, Ch. 12.

    Google Scholar 

  19. WHO (1999). International classification of functioning and disability beta-2 assessment, classification and epidemiology group, WHO/HSC/ACE/99.2, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Brandt E, Pope A, eds. Enabling America: Assessing the role of rehabilitation science and engineering. Committee on Assessing Rehabilitation Sciences, Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Butler RJ. Economic Incentives in disability insurance and behavioral responses. J Occup Rehab 2000; in press.

  22. Beaton D, Cole D, Manno M, Bombardier C, Hogg-Johnson S, Shannon H. Describing the burden of upperextremity musculoskeletal disorders in newspaperworkers: What difference do case definitions make? J Occup Rehab 2000; in press.

  23. Amick B, Habeck R, Hunt A, Fossel A, Chapin Al, Keller R, Katz J. Measuring the Impact of Organizational Behaviors on Work Disability Prevention and Management. J Occup Rehab 2000; in press.

  24. Feuerstein M, Marshal L, Shaw W, Burrel L. Multi-component intervention for work-related upper extremity disorders. J Occup Rehab 2000; in press.

  25. Faucett J, Blanc P, Yelin E. The impact of carpal tunnel syndrome on work status: Implications of job characteristics for staying on the job. J Occup Rehab 2000; in press.

  26. Gates L. Workplace accommodation as a social process. J Occup Rehab 2000; in press.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Armstrong, T.J., Haig, A.J., Franzblau, A. et al. Medical Management and Rehabilitation in the Workplace: Emerging Issues. J Occup Rehabil 10, 1–6 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009428227116

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009428227116

Navigation