Skip to main content
Log in

Women and Economic Security in Retirement:Implications for Social Security Reform

  • Published:
Journal of Family and Economic Issues Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Gender-related parenting roles lower incomes of women during the working-age years and in retirement years. National retirement income programs contribute to this gender-related difference in retirement income to the degree that they consider lifetime earnings in calculating benefits. This article examines two national pension systems: those of Australia and Sweden. The pension systems of these two countries often are considered as the extremes of pension generosity, and they are based upon different philosophies about the role of government in insuring against economic risk. Due to fiscal issues and the changing roles of women in the labor market, both have reformed their systems. How system reforms can balance the role of the government in insuring against income risk and the growing financial independence of women in the work force are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, R. N. (1998). United States abridged life tables; 1996. 1996 National vital statistics reports, 47(13). Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvs47-13.pdf.

  • Bateman, H., & Piggott, J. (1998). Mandating retirement provision: The Australian experience. Working Paper: University of New South Wales.

  • Bureau of Labor Statistics. (1999). Employment characteristics of families: Summary. Labor force statistics from the current population survey. Available at: http://stats.bls.gov/news.release/famee.nws.htm.

  • Doyle, S., & Piggott, J. (2000). Mandatory annuity design: A preliminary study. Retirement Needs Framework. SOA Monograph M-RS00-1 (pp. 43-54). Schaumburg, IL: Society of Actuaries.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grad, S. (1996). Income of the population 55 or older, 1996. Washington, D.C.: Office of Research and Statistics, Social Security Administration. Available at: http://www.ssa.gov/statistics/incpop55/1996/pop55toc.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gramlich, E. M. (1997). How does social security affect the economy? In E. R. Kingson & J. H. Schulz (Eds.), Social security in the 21st century (pp. 147-155). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holden, K. C., & Nicholson, S. (1998). Selection of a joint-and-survivor pension. Discussion paper No. 1175-98, University of Wisconsin, Institute for Research on Poverty.

  • Holden, K. C., & Smock, P. J. (1991). The economic costs of marital dissolution: Why do women bear a disproportionate cost? Annual Review of Sociology, 17, 51-78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holden, K. C., & Zick, C. (1998). The economic impact of widowhood in the United States in the 1990s: The roles of social insurance and private pensions. In P. Flora, P. R. De Jong, J. Le Grand, & J. Kim (Eds.), The state of social welfare, 1997: International studies on social insurance and retirement, employment, family policy and health care (pp. 17-35). Brookfield, VT: Ashgate Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenworthy, L. (1998). Do social-welfare policies reduce poverty? A cross-national assessment. Luxembourg income study working paper No. 188. Available at: http://lissy.ceps.lu/wpapersd.htm.

  • Lee, R., & Shripad, T. (1997). Death and taxes: Longer life, consumption, and social security. Demography 34(1), 67-81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaver, S. (1996). Universality and selectivity in income support: An assessment of the issues. Luxembourg income study working paper No. 145. Available at: http://lissy.ceps.lu/wpapersd.htm.

  • Siegenthaler, J. (1996). Poverty among single elderly women under different systems of old-age security: A comparative review. Luxembourg income study working paper No. 149. Available at: http://lissy.ceps.lu/wpapersc.htm.

  • Smeeding, T. M. (1997). Reshuffling responsibilities in old age: The United States in a comparative perspective. Luxembourg income study working paper No. 153. Available at: http://lissy.ceps.lu/wpapersd.htm.

  • Smeeding, T. M., & Dennis, S. (1998). Generations and the distribution of economic well-being: A cross-national view. Luxembourg income study working paper No. 173. Available at: http://lissy.ceps.lu/wpapersd.htm.

  • Social Security Administration. (1997). Annual statistical supplement to the Social Security Bulletin, 1997. Washington, D.C.: Office of Research, Evaluation and Statistics, Social Security Administration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Social Security Administration. (1999). Social security programs throughout the world. Washington, D.C.: Office of Research, Evaluation and Statistics, Social Security Administration. Available at: http://www.ssa.gov/statistics/ssptw99.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, L. H., & Upp, M. M. (1997). The social insurance approach and social security. In E. R. Kingson & J. H. Schulz (Eds.), Social security in the 21st century (pp. 3-21). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, R. K. (1998). The politics of pensions: Lessons from abroad. In R. D. Arnold, M. J. Graetz, & A. H. Munnell (Eds.), Framing the social security debate: Values, politics, and economics (pp. 183-229). Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Social Insurance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wise, D. A. (1997). Retirement against the demographic trend: More older people living longer, working less, and saving less. Demography 34(1), 83-95.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Spratlin, J., Holden, K.C. Women and Economic Security in Retirement:Implications for Social Security Reform. Journal of Family and Economic Issues 21, 37–63 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009427530441

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009427530441

Navigation