Journal of Science Teacher Education

, Volume 10, Issue 1, pp 43–54 | Cite as

Students' Views About Scientists and School Science: Engaging K-8 Teachers in a National Study

  • Charles R. Barman


National Study 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Atwater, M., Baptiste, P, Daniel, L., Hackett, J., Moyer, R., Takemoto, C., & Wilson, N. (1993). Macmillan/McGraw-Hill science. New York: Macmillan/McGraw-Hill School Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  2. Barman, C., DiSpezio, M., Gutherie, V., Leyden, M., Mercier, C., & Ostlund, K. (1992). Addison-Wesley science. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  3. Barman, C. (1998, April). Research in the elementary classroom. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Science Teachers Association, Las Vegas, NV.Google Scholar
  4. Barman, C. (1996). How do students really view science and scientists? Science and Children, 34, 30–33.Google Scholar
  5. Barman, C., & Ostlund, K. (1996). A protocol to investigate students' perceptions about scientists and relevancy of science to students' daily lives. Science Education International, 7, 16–21.Google Scholar
  6. Brummett, D., Lind, K., Barman, C., DiSpezio, M., & Ostlund, K. (1995). Destinations in science. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  7. Chambers, D. W. (1983). Stereotypic images of the scientists: The draw-a-scientists test. Science Education, 67, 255–265.Google Scholar
  8. Elliot, J. (1991). Action research for educational change. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Eiriksson, S. B. (1995). The use of portfolios in advanced placement biology: A teacher-researcher's change in science assessment practices. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Florida State University, Tallahassee.Google Scholar
  10. Finson, K. D., Beaver, J. B., & Cramond, B. L. (1995). Development and field test of a checklist for the draw-a-scientists test. School Science and Mathematics, 95, 195–205.Google Scholar
  11. Fort, D. C., & Varney, H. L. (1989). How students see scientists: Mostly male, mostly white, and mostly benevolent. Science and Children, 26, 8–13.Google Scholar
  12. Heil, D., Allen, M., Cooney, T., Matamoros, A., Perry, M., & Slesnick, I. (1993). Discover the wonder. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman.Google Scholar
  13. Huber, R. A., & Burton, G. M. (1995). What do students think scientists look like? School Science and Mathematics, 95, 371–376.Google Scholar
  14. Kahle, J. B. (1992). Why girls don't know. In M. K. Pearsall (Ed.), Scope, sequence, and coordination of secondary school science: Vol. II. Revelant research (pp. 111–124). Washington, DC: National Science Teachers Association.Google Scholar
  15. Krause, J. P. (1977). How children see scientists. Science and Children, 14, 9–10.Google Scholar
  16. Maoldomhnaigh, M. O., & Hunt, A. (1988). Some factors affecting the image of the scientist drawn by older primary school pupils. Research in Science and Technological Education, 6, 159–166.Google Scholar
  17. Maoldomhnaigh, M. O., & Mhaolain, V. N. (1990). The perceived expectation of the administrator as a factor affecting the sex of scientists drawn by early adolescent girls. Research in Science and Technological Education, 8, 69–74.Google Scholar
  18. Mercier, S., & Ostlund, K. L. (1996). Rising to the challenge: The national science education standards: The processes of inquiry. Fresno, CA: S&K Associates.Google Scholar
  19. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  20. Project Dragonfly. (1996). Dragonfly. Miami, OH: University of Oxford.Google Scholar
  21. Santa, C., & Santa, J. L. (1995). Teacher as researcher. Journal of Reading Behavior, 27, 439–451.Google Scholar
  22. Schibeci, R. A., & Sorenson, I. (1983). Elementary school children's perceptions of scientists. School Science and Mathematics, 83, 14–19.Google Scholar
  23. Smith, S., Layng, J., & Jones, M. (1996). The impact of qualitative observational methodology on the authentic assessment process. In Proceedings of selected research and development presentations (pp. 745–842). Indianapolis, IN: Association for Educational Communications and Technology.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Charles R. Barman
    • 1
  1. 1.School of EducationIndiana University-Purdue University at IndianapolisIndianapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations