Skip to main content
Log in

Gender Differences in the Content Analysis of 240 Dream Reports from Brazilian Participants in Dream Seminars

  • Published:
Dreaming

Abstract

This study asked the question, “Are there significant content differences between male and female dream reports obtained in dream seminars conducted in Brazil?” Each of the 240 (137 female, 103 male) research participants volunteered recent dream reports (one per person) during dream seminars that he or she attended between 1990 and 1998. Dreams were scored according to Hall-Van de Castle criteria. Comparative Cohen h-statistics revealed several gender differences. Further study is recommended because the dream reports did not represent Brazil's social-economic diversity, and may not have been characteristic of the totality of participants' dream lives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Adler, A. (1938). Social interest: Challenge to mankind. London: Faber and Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonime, W. (1960). The clinical use of dreams. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calkins, M.H. (1893). Statistics ofdreams. American Journal of Psychology, 5, 311–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, D.B. (1973). Sex role orientation and dreamrecall. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 82, 246–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power for the behavioralsciences. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Domhoff, G.W. (1996). Finding meaning in dreams: A quantitative approach.New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Espinoza, R. (1996). More sex, please. We are Brazilian. News from Brazil, pp. 8–16.

  • Globus, G. (1987). Dream life, wake life: The human condition through dreams. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregor, T. (1981). A content analysis of Mehinaku dreams. Ethos, 9, 352–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, C.S. (1953).The meaning of dreams. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, C.S. (1984). “A ubiquitous sex difference in dreams” revisited.Journal of Personal and Social Psychology, 5, 188–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, C.S. (1991). The two provinces of dreams.Dreaming, 1, 91–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, C., & Van de Castle, R.L. (1966). The content analysis of dreams. NewYork: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobson, J.A. (1988). The dreaming brain. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krippner, S., Winkler, M., Rochlen, A., & Yashar, B. (1998). Gender, national, and regional differences in a content analysis of 799 dream reports from research participants in Argentina, Brazil, and the United States. Interamerican Journal of Psychology, 32, 71–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludwig, A., & Segatto, C. (1999). O sentido dos sonhos. Epoca, pp. 65–69.

  • Monroe, R.L., Monroe, R.G., Brasher, A., Severin, T., Schweickart, D., & Moore, R. (1985). Sex differences in East African dreams. Journal of Social Psychology, 125, 405–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monroe, R.L., Nerlove, S., & Daniels, R. (1969). Effects ofpopulation density on food concerns in three East African societies. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 10, 161–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Punamaki, R.-L., & Joustie, M. (1998). The role of culture, violence, and personal factors affective dream content.Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29, 320–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prasad, B. (1982). Content analysis of dreams of Indian andAmerican college students—a cultural comparison. Journal of Indian Psychology, 4, 54–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segall, M.H. (1998).Cross-cultural psychology as a scholarly discipline: On the flowering of culture in behavioral research. American Psychologist, 53, 1101–1110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shweder, R.A. (1991). Thinking through cultures: Expeditions in cultural psychology.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shweder, R.A. (1993). “Why do men barbecue?” and other postmodern ironiesof growing up in the decade of ethnicity. Deadalus, 122(1), 279–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soper, B., Rosenthal, G., & Milford, G.(1994). Gender differences in dream perspectives. Psychological Reports, 74, 311–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephen, L. (1997).Woman and social movements in Latin America. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Surratt, M.A., & Inciardi, J.A. (1998).Unraveling the concept of race in Brazil: Issues for the Rio de Janeiro cooperative agreement site. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 30, 255–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tedlock, B. (1987). Dreaming and dream research. In B. Tedlock (Ed.), Dreaming:Anthropological and psychological interpretations (pp. 1–30). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van deCastle, R.L. (1966). Animal figures in dreams: Age, sex, and cultural differences. (Abstract.) American Psychologist, 21, 623.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Castle, R.L. (1969). Problems in applying the methodology of content analysis to dreams. In M. Kramer(Ed.). Dream psychology and the new biology of dreaming (pp. 185–197). Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van deCastle, R.L. (1994). Our dreaming mind. New York: Ballantine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winget, C., & Kramer, M. (1979). Dimensions ofdreams. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winget, C., Kramer, M., & Whitman, R.M. (1972). Dreams anddemography. Canadian Psychiatric Association Journal, 17, 203–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, C.H., & Magno de Carvalho, J.(1988). The demography of inequality in Brazil. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Krippner, S., Weinhold, J. Gender Differences in the Content Analysis of 240 Dream Reports from Brazilian Participants in Dream Seminars. Dreaming 11, 35–42 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009416500719

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009416500719

Navigation