Abstract
This article serves as an introduction to a series on training in psychotherapy integration. There exist very few formal training programs at the graduate level to systematically guide clinicians in the application of integrative and eclectic treatments. The goal of this series is to present current efforts and ideal training models from three major pathways toward psychotherapy integration: theoretical integration, prescriptive eclectic, and common factors.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Andrews, J. D., Norcross, J. C., & Halgin, R. P. (1992). Training in psychotherapy integration. In J. C. Norcross & M. R. Goldfried (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy integration. New York: Basic Books.
Arkowitz, H. (1992). Integrative theories of therapy. In D. K. Freedheim (Ed.), The history of psychotherapy, A century of change. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Castonguay, L. G., & Goldfried, M. R. (1994). Psychotherapy integration: An idea whose time has come. Applied and Preventive Psychology, 3, 159–172.
Lecomte, C., Castonguay, L. G., Cyr, M., & Sabourin, S. (1993). Supervision and instruction in doctoral psychotherapy integration. In G. Stricker & J. Gold (Eds.), The comprehensive handbook of psychotherapy integration. New York: Plenum.
Norcross, J. C., & Kaplan, K. J. (1995). Training in psychotherapy integration. I: Integrative/ eclectic programs. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 5, 267–272.
Norcross, J. C., & Newman, C. F. (1992). Psychotherapy integration: Setting the context. In J. C. Norcross & M. R. Goldfried (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy integration. New York: Basic Books.
Robertson, M. H. (1986). Training eclectic psychotherapists. In J. C. Norcross (Ed.), Handbook of eclectic psychotherapy. New York: Brunner/Mazel.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Castonguay, L.G. Training in Psychotherapy Integration: Introduction to Current Efforts and Future Visions. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration 10, 229–231 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009408611265
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009408611265