Abstract
This article seeks to identify and address the normative void that resides at the heart of postmodernist-feminist theory, and to propose a philosophical framework – beyond postmodernism, but incorporating its central insights – for thinking through the normative questions with which feminists are inevitably confronted in their engagements with positive law. Two varieties of postmodernist-feminism are identified and critically analysed: the ‘corporeal feminism’ of Elizabeth Grosz and Judith Butler, which seeks to ground feminist critical practice in the irruptive capacities of the material body considered as an arte fact of social construction; and the deconstructionist feminism of Drucilla Cornell, for whom ‘the feminine’ is an indeterminate but disruptive force beyond its construction in law and in other social sites. The first component of the argument elaborated here is that each of these approaches ultimately reduces to a form of aestheticism which is incapable of generating a worthwhile and workable feminist approach to the restructuring of politics and law. The second component of the argument involves a return to aesthetics, in particular to the philosophical aesthetics of Kant’s Critique of Judgement. Kant’s aesthetic philosophy, it will be suggested, yields a framework of concepts which, duly re-manipulated, could speak to the very concerns that have inspired postmodernist-feminism: how to attend to (bodily) particularity while avoiding the dangers associated with ‘essentialism’; and how to theorise the propensity of the unrepresentable power of the feminine to exceed both embodied human capacities and the confining rein of socially privileged rationalities. Crucially, however it also responds to a set of preoccupations – those of the feminist lawyer – that cannot be accommodated by postmodernism: how to translate embodied experience into (legal) norms; generalise from the particular; seek consensus; and codify an endless potentiality in the form of law.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
REFERENCES
Adorno, T., Aesthetic Theory (trans. Robert Hullot-Kantor) (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1997).
Arendt, H., Lectures on Kant's Political Philosophy (London: Harvester 1982).
Barron, A., “Legal Discourse and the Colonisation of the Self in the Modern State” in Post-Modern Law, ed. A. Carty (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1990), 107-125.
Barron, A., “Lyotard and the Problem of Justice”, in Judging Lyotard, ed. A. Benjamin (London: Routledge, 1992), 26-42.
Barron, A., “The Illusions of the 'I': Citizenship and the Politics of Identity”, in Closure or Critique, ed. A. Norrie (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1993), 80-100.
Barron, A., “Spectacular Jurisprudence”, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 20/2 (2000a) 301-315.
Barron, A., “Aesthetics, Critique and Jurisprudence” (draft on file with the author, 2000b).
Bataille, G., Visions of Excess (trans. Allan Stoekl) (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1985).
Battersby, C., The Phenomenal Woman: Feminist Metaphysics and the Patterns of Identity (Cambridge: Polity, 1998).
Battersby, C., “Stages on Kant's Way: Aesthetics, Morality, and the Gendered Sublime”, in Feminism and Tradition in Aesthetics, ed. P.Z. Brand & C. Korsmeyer (Pennsylvania: Penn State University Press, 1995), 88-114.
Beardsworth, R., Derrida and the Political (London: Routledge, 1996).
Bernstein, J., The Fate of Art (Cambridge: Polity, 1992).
Butler, J., Bodies that Matter: On the Discursive Limits of “Sex” (London: Routledge, 1993).
Coole, D., Negativity and Politics: Dionysius and Dialectics from Kant to Poststructuralism (London: Routledge, 2000).
Cornell, D., Beyond Accommodation (London: Routledge, 1991).
Cornell, D., Transformations (London: Routledge, 1993).
Dews, P., Logics of Disintegration (London: Verso, 1987).
Eagleton, T., The Ideology of the Aesthetic (Oxford: Blackwell, 1990).
Eagleton, T., “The Ideology of the Aesthetic”, in The Politics of Pleasure: Aesthetics and Cultural Theory, ed. S. Regan (Buckingham: Open University Press 1992), 17-31.
Foucault, M., Madness and Civilisation: A History of Insanity in the Age of Reason (trans. Richard Howard) (New York: Vintage Books, 1965).
Foucault, M., Discipline and Punish (trans. Alan Sheridan) (London: Penguin 1977).
Foucault, M., The History of Sexuality: An Introduction (trans. Robert Hurley) (London: Penguin, 1979).
Foucault, M., “Two Lectures”, in Power/Knowledge, ed. C. Gordon (London: Harvester, 1980) pp. 78-108.
Foucault, M., “On the Genealogy of Ethics”, in Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics, ed. H. Dreyfus & P. Rabinow (Chicago, Chicago University Press, 1983).
Foucault, M., “What is Enlightenment?”, in The Foucault Reader, ed. P. Rabinow (London: Penguin, 1986), 32-50.
Foucault, M., The Use of Pleasure (trans. Robert Hurley) (New York: Vintage Books, 1990a).
Foucault, M., The Care of the Self (trans. Robert Hurley) (New York: Vintage Books, 1990b).
Foucault, M., “Preface to Transgression”, in Aesthetics, Method and Epistemology, ed. J. Faubion (trans. Robert Hurley) (London: Allen Lane, 1998), 69-87.
Fraser, N., “Foucault on Modern Power: Empirical Insights and Normative Confusions”, Praxis International (1981), 273-287.
Freud, S., The Interpretation of Dreams (1900-1901) in The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Vols. 4 and 5, ed. J. Strachey (London; Penguin 1991).
Goodrich, P., “Specula Laws: Image, Aesthetic and Common Law”, Law and Critique 2 (1991), 233-254.
Goodrich, P., “Critical Legal Studies in England: Prospective Histories”, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 12 (1992), 191-236.
Goodrich, P., Oedipus Lex (Berkeley: University of California, 1995).
Goodrich, P., “Criminology and the Aesthetic of Feminine Disappearance”, Modern Law Review 60 (1997a), 428-444.
Goodrich, P., “Introduction”, in Law and the Unconscious: A Legendre Reader, ed. P. Goodrich (London: Macmillan, 1997b).
Goodrich, P., “The Iconography of Nothing: Blank Spaces and the Representation of Law in Edward VI and the Pope”, in Law and the Image: The Authority of Art and the Aesthetics of Law, ed. C. Douzinas and L. Nead (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1999).
Grosz, E., Volatile Bodies: Towards a Corporeal Feminism (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1994).
Guyer, P., Kant and the Experience of Freedom (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).
Habermas, J., The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity (Cambridge: Polity, 1985).
Habermas, J., “Modernity: an Unfinished Project”, in Habermas and the Unfinished Project of Modernity, ed. M.P. d'Entreves and S. Benhabib (Cambridge: Polity, 1996), 38-55.
Hadot, P., Philosophy as a Way of Life (Oxford: Blackwell, 1985).
Irigiray, L., Thinking the Difference (trans. Karen Montin), (London: Athlone Press, 1994).
Jay, M., Downcast Eyes: The Denigration of Vision in Twentieth Century French Thought (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1994).
Kant, I., Critique of Pure Reason (1781) (trans.W.S. Pluhar) (Indianapolis: Hackett, 1996).
Kant, I., Critique of Practical Reason (1788) in Immanuel Kant, Practical Philosophy, ed. M.J. Gregor (Cambridge: CUP 1996), 133-271.
Kant, I., Critique of Judgement (1790) (trans. W.S. Pluhar) (Indianapolis: Hackett, 1987).
Lacan, J., Ecrits: A Selection (trans. Alan Sheridan) (London: Tavistock, 1977).
Lacan, J., The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis (trans. Alan Sheridan) (London: Penguin, 1979).
Lacey, N., “Feminist Legal Theory Beyond Neutrality”, Current Legal Problems (1995), 1-38.
Levin, D.M. (ed.), Modernity and the Hegemony of Vision (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995).
Litowitz, D.E., Postmodern Philosophy and Law (Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1997).
Lyotard, J-F. & Thébaud, J-L., Just Gaming (trans. W. Godzich) (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1985).
Melville, S. & Readings, B., “Introduction”, in Vision and Textuality ed. S. Melville & B. Readings (London: Macmillan, 1995), 3-31.
Nussbaum, M.C., “The Professor of Parody”, The New Republic (1999) (http://www.tnr. com/magazines/tnr/archive/0299/022299/nussbaum022299.html).
Valverde, M., “Derrida's Justice and Foucault's Freedom: Ethics, History and Social Movements”, Law and Social Inquiry 24(3) (1999), 401-422.
Venn, C., “Beyond Enlightenment?”, Theory, Culture and Society 14(3) (1997), 1-28.
Young, A., Imagining Crime (London: Sage, 1996).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Barron, A. Feminism, Aestheticism and the Limits of Law. Feminist Legal Studies 8, 275–317 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009240600265
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009240600265