Skip to main content
Log in

From Democratic Dualism to Political Realism: Transforming the Constitution

  • Published:
Constitutional Political Economy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the latest volume of Bruce Ackerman's We the People, he sets out to demonstrate that the Constitution has been legitimately amended by “unconventional” means, or by mechanisms other than the Article V amendment process. In making this argument, Ackerman offers a rich constitutional history of the Founding period, the Reconstruction era, and the New Deal. He successfully demonstrates that unconventional methods were used to alter accepted constitutional meaning and government practices during these periods. Unfortunately, Ackerman does not provide an adequate theory that can demonstrate the legal significance of these historical events for future constitutional practice. Moreover, his effort to legitimate the New Deal's constitutional revolution undermines his own normative theory of “dualist democracy” and seems to embrace a standard Legal Realist analysis that the Constitution simply is whatever powerful government officials declare it to mean.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackerman, B. (1984) "Discovering the Constitution." Yale Law Journal 93: 1013–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackerman, B. (1985) "Beyond Carolene Products." Harvard Law Review 98: 713–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackerman, B. (1988) "Transformative Appointments." Harvard Law Review 101: 1164–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackerman, B. (1989) "Constitutional Politics/Constitutional Law." Yale Law Journal 99: 453–547.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackerman, B. (1991) We the People: Vol. 1, Foundations. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackerman, B. (1992) "Liberating Abstraction." University of Chicago Law Review 59: 317–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackerman, B. (1997) "A Generation of Betrayal?" Fordham Law Review 65: 1519–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackerman, B. (1998) We the People: Vol. 2, Transformations. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackerman, B., and Golove, D. (1995) Is Nafta Constitutional? Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackerman, B., and Katyal, N.K. (1995) "Our Unconventional Founding." University of Chicago Law Review 62: 475–573.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, R. (1977) Government by Judiciary: The Transformation of the Fourteenth Amendment. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bickel, A. M. (1962) The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bork, R. H. (1990) The Tempting of America: The Political Seduction of the Law. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnham, W. D. (1970) Critical Elections and the Mainsprings of American Politics. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmines, E. G., and Stimson, J. A. (1989) Issue Evolution: Race and the Transformation of American Politics.Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, R. (1978) Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ely, J. H. (1980) Democracy and Distrust: A Theory of Judicial Review. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, R. A. (1985) Takings: Private Property and the Power of Eminent Domain. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, J. E. (1998)"We the Unconventional American People." University of Chicago Law Review65: 1513–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillman, H. (1993) The Constitution Besieged: The Rise and Demise of Lochner Era Police Powers Jurisprudence.Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leuchtenburg, W. E. (1995) The Supreme Court Reborn: The Constitutional Revolution in the Age of Roosevelt.New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madison, J., Hamilton, A., and Jay, J. (1961) The Federalist Papers. Rossiter, C. (ed.) New York: Mentor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, H. C. (1991) America's Constitutional Soul. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayhew, D. R. (1991) Divided We Govern: Party Control, Lawmaking, and Investigations, 1946–1990. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, G. N. (1999) "Review of Bruce Ackerman's We the People: Transformations." The Green Bag 2: 209–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherry, S. (1992) "The Ghost of Liberalism Past." Harvard Law Review 105: 918–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skowronek, S. (1993) The Politics Presidents Make: Leadership from John Adams to George Bush. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunstein, C. R. (1993) The Partial Constitution. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittington, K. E. (1999a) Constitutional Construction: Divided Powers and Constitutional Meaning. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittington, K. E. (1999b) Constitutional Interpretation: Textual Meaning, Original Intent and Judicial Review.Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, G. S. (1969) The Creation of the American Republic, 1776–1787. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Whittington, K.E. From Democratic Dualism to Political Realism: Transforming the Constitution. Constitutional Political Economy 10, 405–414 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009083219010

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009083219010

Keywords

Navigation