Abstract
Our fiscal process divorces payment from use. Whilethis divorce has led many analysts of government to separatediscussion of public expenditures from their funding, or usefrom payment, we argue that this approach does not provide auseful framework for understanding our public choices. We arguethat it is the divorce of payment from use that underlies ourfiscal process and, rather than simply “dismiss out of hand”the study of our fiscal process, it should be an integral partof our study of government. Our framework for describing fiscalinstitutions indicates how our fiscal process invites rent-seekingbecause it allows beneficiaries of programs to avoid paymentfor those programs. We conclude by examining how various changesin the fiscal process may influence our public choices.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
References
Black, D. (1958) The Theory of Committees and Elections. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bowen, H. R. (1943) "The Interpretation of Voting in the Allocation of Economic Resources." Quarterly Journal of Economics 58: 27–48.
Buchanan, J. M. (1963) "The Economics of Earmarked Taxes." Journal of Political Economy 71: 457–69.
Buchanan, J. M. (1967) Public Finance in Democratic Process. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
Browning, E. K. (1975) "Collective Choice and General Fund Financing," Journal of Political Economy 83: 377–90.
Friedman, M., and Friedman, R. (1983) The Tryanny of the Status Quo. Orlando, Fl.: Harcourt, Brace and Jovanovich.
Frolich, N., and Oppenheimer, J. (1990) "Redistributive Politics: A Theory of Taxation for an Incumbent Democracy." Public Choice 64: 135–54.
Goetz, C. J. (1968) "Earmarked Taxes and Majority Rule Budgetary Processes." American Economic Review 58: 128–36.
Hettich, W., and Winer, S. (1984) "A Positive Model of Tax Structure." Journal of Public Economics 24: 67–87.
Hunter, W. J., and Nelson, M. A. (1989) "Interest Group Demand for Taxation." Public Choice 62: 41–62.
Marlow, M. L. (1992) "Intergovernmental Competition, Voice and Exit Options, and the Design of Fiscal Structure." Constitutional Political Economy 3: 73–88.
Marlow, M. L., and Orzechowski,W. (1988) "Controlling Leviathan Through Tax Reduction." Public Choice 58: 237–45.
Orzechowski, W. (1991) "Reaganomics and the Use of Collective Rebates." Public Choice 69: 311–22.
Perez, A., and Snell. R. (1995) Earmarking State Taxes. Denver, Col.: National Conference of State Legislatures.
Tullock, G. (1989) The Economics of Special Privilege and Rent Seeking. Norwell, Mass.: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Wagner, R. E. (1988) "The Calculus of Consent: A Wicksellian Retrospective." Public Choice 56: 153–66.
Wagner, R. E., (ed.) (1991) Charging for Government. User Charges and Earmarked Taxes in Principle and Practice. London: Routledge.
Wagner, R. E. (1992) "Grazing the Federal Budgetary Commons: The Rational Politics of Budgetary Irresponsibility." The Journal of Law and Politics IX: 105–19.
Wicksell, K. (1896) Finanztheoretische Untersuchungen, nebst Darstellung und Kritik des Steuerwesens Schwedens. Jena: Gustav Fischer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Marlow, M.L., Orzechowski, W.P. The Separation of Spending from Taxation: Implications for Collective Choices. Constitutional Political Economy 8, 151–163 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009016509573
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009016509573
Keywords
- Public Choice
- Public Expenditure
- Collective Choice
- Process Divorce
- Fiscal Process