Skip to main content
Log in

A Model of the Representation of Interests in a Compound Democracy

  • Published:
Constitutional Political Economy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper provides a model of democratic government as a compound of independent elective and non elective “centers of power” that compete in fostering the demands of voters and of interest groups. The analysis describes how interests of voters and of pressure groups are represented and under what conditions the compound democracy is more responsive to voters' or to interest groups' demands. These conditions are shown to depend on the center of power's relative opportunity costs at serving a plurality of interests and on the severeness of informational asymmetries between voters and interest groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Austen-Smith, D. (1996) “Interest Groups: Money, Information and Influence.” In: Mueller, D. C. (ed.) Perspectives on Public Choice. A Handbook, pp. 296-321. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, G., and Buchanan, J. M. (1980) The Power to Tax. Analytical Foundations of a Fiscal Constitution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breton, A. (1996) Competitive Governments. An Economic Theory of Politics and Public Finance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzau, A. T., and Munger, M. C. (1986) “Legislators and Interest Groups: How Unorganized Interests Get Represented.” American Political Science Review 80: 89-106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inman, R. P., and Rubinfeld, D. L. (1996) “The Political Economy of Federalism.” In: Mueller, D. C. (ed.) Perspectives on Public Choice. A Handbook, pp. 73-105. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B. S. (1996) “The Public Choice of International Organizations.” In: Mueller, D. C. (ed.) Perspectives on Public Choice. A Handbook, pp. 106-23. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laffont, J. J., and Martimort D. (1998) “Transaction Costs, Institutional Design and the Separation of Powers.” European Economic Review 42: 673-684.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landes, W. M., and Posner, R. A. (1975) “The Independent Judiciary in an Interest-Group Perspective.” Journal of Law and Economics 18: 875-901.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, R. E., and Tollison, R. D. (1981) Politicians, Legislation and the Economy. An Inquiry into the Interest Group Theory of Government. Boston: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moe, T. M. (1996) “The Positive Theory of Public Bureaucracy.” In: Mueller, D. C. (ed.) Perspectives on Public Choice. A Handbook, pp. 445-80. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, D. C. (1989) Public Choice II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, D. C. (ed.) (1996) Perspectives on Public Choice. A Handbook. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niskanen, W. A. (1971) Bureaucracy and Representative Government. New York: Aldine Atherton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. Jr. (1971) The Logic of Collective Action. Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E., and Walker J. (1996) “Neither Markets Nor States: Linking Transformation Processes in Collecting Action Arenas.” In: Mueller, D. C. (ed.) Perspectives on Public Choice. A Handbook, pp. 35-72. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, V. (1987) The Political Theory of a Compound Republic. Designing the American Experiment. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson T., Roland G., and Tabellini G. (1997a) “Separation of Powers and Political Accountability.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 115: 1163-1202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson T., Roland G., and Tabellini G. (1997b) “Comparative Politics and Public Finance.” IGIER Working Paper n. 114.

  • Rowley, C. K. (1994) “Introduction.” In: Rowley, C. K. (ed.) Public Choice Theory, Vol. I. Aldershot: Edward Elgar: IX-XXIX.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tollison, R. D. (1996) “Rent Seeking.” In: Mueller, D. C. (ed.) Perspectives on Public Choice. A Handbook, pp. 506-25. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weingast, B. R, and Marshall, W. (1988) “The Industrial Organization of Congress: Or, Why Legislatures, Like Firms, Are Not Organized as Markets.” Journal of Political Economy 89: 642-664.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittman, D. (1989) “Why Democracies Produce Efficient Results.” Journal of Political Economy 97: 1395-1424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittman, D. (1996) The Myth of Democratic Failure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bavetta, S., Padovano, F. A Model of the Representation of Interests in a Compound Democracy. Constitutional Political Economy 11, 5–25 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009010715599

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009010715599

Navigation