Abstract
We investigate the performance of workload rules used to support customer order acceptance decisions in the hierarchical production control structure of a batch chemical plant. Customer order acceptance decisions need to be made at a point in time when no detailed information is available about the actual shop floor status during execution of the order. These decisions need therefore be based on aggregate models of the shop floor, which predict the feasibility of completing the customer order in time. In practice, workload rules are commonly used to estimate the availability of sufficient capacity to complete a set of orders in a given planning period. Actual observations in a batch chemical manufacturing plant show that the set of orders accepted needs to be reconsidered later, because the schedule turns out to be infeasible. Analysis of the planning processes used at the plant shows that workload rules can yields reliable results, however at the expense of a rather low capacity utilization. In practice this is often unacceptable. Since, solving a detailed scheduling problem is not feasible at this stage, this creates a dilemma that only can be solved if we can find more detailed aggregate models than workload rules can provide.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Axsäter, S. (1981) Aggregation of product data for hierarchical production planning. Operations Research, 29, 744–756.
Axsäter, S. and Jönsson, H. (1984) Aggregation and disaggregation in hierarchical production planning. EJOR, 17, 338–350.
Bertrand, J. W. M. and Wortmann, J. C. (1981) Production control and information systems for component manufacturing shops. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
Bertrand, J. W. M., Wortmann, J. C. and Wijngaard, J. (1990) Production control: a structural and design oriented approach. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
Bitran, G. R. and Tirupati, D. (1993) Hierarchical production planning. In Handbooks in OR and MS, 4, Ed. S.C. Graves et al.
Buzacott, J. A. and Shantikumar, J. G. (1993) Stochastic models of manufacturing systems. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs NJ.
Graves, S. C. (1982) Using Lagrangian techniques to solve hierarchical production planning problems. MS, 28, 260–275.
Hax, A. C. and Meal, H. C. (1975) Hierarchical integration of production planning and scheduling. In Studies in the Management Science, 1 ‘Logistics’, M.A. Geisler, (ed.). North-Holland.
Holt, C. C., Modigliani, Muth, F. J. and Simon, H. A. (1960) Planning, production, inventories and work force. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs NJ.
Hopp, W. J. and Spearman, M. L. (1996) Factory physics: foundations of manufacturing management. Irwin, London.
Meal, H. C. (1978) A study of multi-stage production planning. In Studies in Operations Management, Ed. A.C. Hax, North-Holland.
Meal, H. C. (1984) Putting production decisions where they belong. HBR, 62, 102–111.
Raaymakers, W. H. M. and Hoogeveen, J. A. (1998) Scheduling multipurpose batch process industries with no-wait restrictions by simulated annealing. Research report TUE/TM/LBS/98–04, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven.
Reklaitis, G. V. (1990) Progress and Issues in Computer-Aided Batch Process Design. In Foundations of Computer-Aided Process Design, J. J. Siirola, I. E. Grossmann and G. Stephanopoulos (eds). Elsevier, Amsterdam.
Schneeweiß, Ch. (1995) Hierarchical structures in organisations: a conceptual framework. EJOR, 86, 4–31.
Van Ooijen, H. P. G. (1996) Load-based work-order release and its effectiveness on delivery performance improvement. PhD-thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven.
Wiendahl, H.-P. (1995) Load-oriented manufacturing control. Springer, Berlin.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Raaymakers, W.H.M., Bertrand, J.M. & Fransoo, J.C. The performance of workload rules for order acceptance in batch chemical manufacturing. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 11, 217–228 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008999002145
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008999002145