Skip to main content
Log in

Relief of symptoms and improvement of quality of life five years after coronary artery bypass grafting in relation to preoperative ejection fraction

  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aim: To describe the relief of symptoms and improvement in Quality of Life (QoL) 5 years after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in relation to preoperative ejection fraction (EF). Methods: Patients who underwent CABG between 1988 and 1991 in western Sweden were approached with an inquiry prior to surgery and 5 years after the operation. Quality of Life was estimated with three different instruments: Physical activity score, Nottingham Health Profile and Psychological General Well-being Index. Results: Among all patients who underwent CABG (n = 1904) the 5-year mortality rate was 27% in those with EF < 0.40 and 12% in those with EF ≥ 0.40 (p < 0.0001). In all, 849 patients, of whom 58 (7%) had EF < 0.40 participated in the evaluation. Neither physical activity, symptoms of chest pain, dyspnea nor any indices of QoL were significantly associated with preoperative EF. Improvement in physical activity, symptoms of chest pain and dyspnea and various estimates of QoL appeared similar and marked regardless of preoperative EF. Conclusion: Among survivors there was no association between preoperative EF and symptoms or various estimates of QoL 5 years after CABG. Improvement in symptoms and QoL were not dependent on preoperative EF.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. European Coronary Surgery Study Group. Long-term re-sults of prospective randomised study of coronary artery bypass surgery in stable angina pectoris. Lancet 1982; ii: 1173–1180.

    Google Scholar 

  2. CASS principal investigators and their associates. Coro-nary artery surgery study (CASS): A randomized trial of coronary artery bypass surgery. Circulation 1983; 68: 951–960.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hultgren HN, Peduzzi P, Detre K, Takaro T and the study participants. The 5 year effect of bypass surgery on relief of angina and exercise performance. Circulation 1985; 72(Suppl. V): V-79–V-83.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kirklin JW, Naftel DC, Blackstone EH, Pohost GM. Summary of a consensus concerning death and ischemic events after coronary artery bypass grafting. Circulation 1989; 79(Suppl. I): I-81–I-91.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Varnauskas E and the European Coronary Surgery Study Group. Twelve-year follow-up of survival in the randomized European coronary surgery study. N Engl J Med 1988; 319: 332–337.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Califf RM, Harrell FE Jr, Lee KL, et al. The evolution of medical and surgical therapy for coronary artery disease: A 15 year perspective. JAMA 1989; 261: 2077–2086.

    Google Scholar 

  7. CASS principal investigators and their associates. Coro-nary artery surgery study (CASS): A randomized trial of coronary artery bypass surgery. Survival data. Circulation 1983; 68: 939–950.

    Google Scholar 

  8. SjoÈ land H, Caidahl K, Wiklund I, et al. Preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction does not influence the improvement in Quality of Life after coronary artery bypass surgery. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998; 46: 198–206.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rose GA, Blackburn H, Gillum RF, Prineas RJ. Cardio-vascular survey methods. World Health Organization Monograph Series No. 56, Geneva, 2nd edn, 1982; 162–166.

  10. Eriksson H, Caidahl K, Svärdsudd K, et al. Cardiac and pulmonary causes of dyspnea. A validation of a scoring test for clinical–epidemiological use. The study of Men born in 1913. Eur Heart J 1987; 8: 1007–1014.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Eriksson H, Caidahl K, Svärdsudd K, Wilhelmsen L. Relation of dyspnea to left ventricular wall motion distur-bances in a population of 67-year-old men. Am J Cardiol 1987; 59: 1277–1282.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hagman M, Wilhelmsen L, Pennert K, Wedel H. Factors of importance for prognosis in men with angina pectoris de-rived from a random population sample. The Multifactor Primary Prevention Trial, Gothenburg, Sweden. Am J Cardiol 1988; 61: 530–535.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rogers WJ, Coggin J, Gersh BJ, et al. for the CASS in-vestigators. Ten-year follow-up of quality of life in patients randomized to receive surgery. Circulation 1990; 82: 1647–1658.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wilson A, Wiklund I, Lahti T, Wahl M. A summary index for the assessment of quality of life in angina pectoris. J Clin Epidemiol 1991; 44: 981–988.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wiklund I, Romanus B, Hunt S. Self-assessed disability in patients with arthrosis of the hip joint. Reliability of the Swedish version of the Nottingham Health Profile. Int Disabil Stud 1988; 10: 159–163.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hunt S, Wiklund I. Cross-cultural variation in the weighting of health statements: A comparison of English and Swedish valuations. Health Policy 1987; 8: 227–235.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dupuy H. The Psychological General Well-being (PGWB) Index. In: Wenger NK, Mattson ME, Furberg CD, Elinson J (eds) Assessment of Quality of Life in Clinical Trials of Cardiovascular Therapies. New York: Le Jacq Publishers, Inc; 1984: 170–183.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mayou R. The patient with angina: Symptoms and dis-ability. Postgrad Med J 1973; 49: 250–254.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Dongier M. Psychosomatic aspects in myocardial infarction in comparison with angina pectoris. Psychother Psychosom 1974; 23: 123–131.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Smith TW, Follicle MJ, Korr KS. Anger, neuroticism, type A behaviour and the experience of angina. Br J Med Psy-chol 1984; 57: 249–252.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hunt S. Subjective health indicators and health promotion. Health Promotion 1986; 3: 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  22. McCauley GA. Quality of life assessment before and after growth hormone treatment in adults with growth hormone deficiency. Acta Paediatr Scand 1989; 365(suppl): 70–72.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Goldman L, Hashimoto B, Cook F, Loscalzo A. Comparative reproducibility and validity of systems for assessing cardiovascular functional class: Advantages of a new specific activity scale. Circulation 1981; 64: 1227–1234.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Pfeffer MA, Braunwald E, MoyéL, et al. Effects of cap-topril on mortality and morbidity in patients with left ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction: Results of the survival and ventricular enlargement trial. N Engl J Med 1992; 327: 669–677.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Caine N, Sharples LD, Wallwork J. Prospective study of health related quality of life before and after coronary artery bypass grafting: Outcome at five years. Heart 1999; 81: 347–351.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Booth DC, Deupree RH, Hultgren HN, et al. Quality of life after bypass surgery for unstable angina. Circulation 1991; 83: 87–95.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Franciosa JA, Park M, Levine TB. Lack of correlation between exercise capacity and indexes of resting left ventricular performance in heart failure. Am J Cardiology 1981; 47: 33–39.

    Google Scholar 

  28. SjoÈ land H, Wiklund I, Caidahl K, Haglid M, Westberg S, Herlitz J. Improvement in quality of life and exercise ca-pacity after coronary bypass surgery. Arch Intern Med 1996; 156: 265–271.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Aravot DJ, Banner NR, Khaghani A, et al. Cardiac transplantation in the seventh decade of life. Am J Cardiol 1989; 163: 90–93.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Cowley AJ, Skene AM. Treatment of severe heart failure: Quantity or quality of life? A trial of enoximone. Br Heart J 1994; 72: 226–230.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Dracup K, Walden JA, Stevenson LW, Brecht M-L. Quality of life in patients with advanced heart failure. J Heart Lung Transplant 1992; 11: 273–279.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Caine N, Harrison SCW, Sharples LD, Wallwork J. Prospective study of quality of life before and after coronary artery bypass grafting. Brit Med J 1991; 302: 511–516.

    Google Scholar 

  33. SjoÈ land H, Caidahl K, Wiklund I, et al. Preoperative left-ventricular ejection fraction does not influence the improvement in Quality of Life after coronary artery bypass surgery. Thorac Cardiovasc Surgeon 1998; 46: 198–206.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Herlitz J, Brandrup-Wognsen G, Karlson BW, et al. Lim-itation of physical activity, dyspnoea and chest pain before and 2 years after coronary artery bypass grafting in relation to preoperative ejection fraction. Scand Cardiovasc J 2000; 34: 65–72.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Pocock SJ, Henderson RA, Seed P, Treasure T, Hampton JR for the RITA Trial participants. Quality of life em-ployment status, and anginal symptoms after coronary angioplasty or bypass surgery. 3-year follow up in the randomized intervention treatment of angina (RITA) Trial. Circulation 1996; 94: 135–142.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Langenburg SE, Buchanan SA, Blackburne LH, et al. Predicting survival after coronary revascularization for ischemic cardiomyopathy. Ann Thoracic Surg 1995; 60: 1193–1196.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Herlitz, J., Wiklund, I., Sjöland, H. et al. Relief of symptoms and improvement of quality of life five years after coronary artery bypass grafting in relation to preoperative ejection fraction. Qual Life Res 9, 467–475 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008996812130

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008996812130

Navigation