Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of casting method on castability of titanium and dental alloys

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Titanium, once considered to be difficult to cast because of its relatively high melting point \(\left( {1670 \pm 50^\circ {\text{C}}} \right)\) and strong chemical affinity, can now be acceptably cast using newly developed casting apparatus. The objectives of this study were to examine the castability of commercially pure (CP) titanium using an ultra high-speed centrifugal casting machine and a pressure difference-type casting unit and to compare the castability of titanium with that of conventional dental casting alloys. To determine castability, two types of patterns were used: a mesh pattern of 22 × 24 mm cut polyether thread sieve, and a saucer pattern (24 mm diameter) perforated to create four T-shaped ends. The casting equipment significantly affected the mold filling of both patterns \(\left( {p < 0.001} \right)\). The castability indices obtained from both patterns of CP titanium cast in the centrifugal casting machine were significantly \(\left( {p < 0.05} \right)\) better than the indices of the castings produced in the pressure-difference casting unit. The radiographs of the saucer pattern cast in the centrifugal casting machine showed some pores that were fewer and smaller in size than the pores found in castings made in the pressure-difference unit. When the ultra high-speed centrifugal casting machine was used with the manufacturer’s recommended mold material, the castability of titanium was similar to that of gold alloy or Ni-Cr alloy cast by conventional means.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. E. Stenman and M. Bergma, Scand. J. Dent. Res. 97 (1989) 76.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. A. Marcusso, Contact Dermatitis 34 (1996) 320.

    Google Scholar 

  3. T. Okabe and H. Herø, Cells and Materials 5 (1995) 211.

    Google Scholar 

  4. R. R. Wang and A. M. Boyle, J. Prosthet. Dent. 70 (1993) 275.

    Google Scholar 

  5. H. Herø, M. Syverud and M. Waarli, Dent. Mater. 9 (1993) 15.

    Google Scholar 

  6. I. Watanabe, J. H. Watkins, H. Nakajima, M. Atsuta and T. Okabe, J. Dent. Res. 76 (1997) 773.

    Google Scholar 

  7. T. Togaya and K. Ida, in Transactions of the 3rd World Biomaterials Congress, Kyoto, Japan, April 21–23, 1988 (Business Center for Acad. Soc., Tokyo, Japan, 1988) 5P–34, 575.

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. Kuroiwa, K. Wada, Y. Hibino, O. Yoshida, Y. Kakumoto, H. Kouchi, K. Nagayama and H. Hashimoto, J. Jpn. Dent. Mater. 9 (1990) 279 (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. Syverud and H. Herø, Dent. Mater. 11 (1995) 14.

    Google Scholar 

  10. T. I. Chai and R. S. Stein, J. Prosthet. Dent. 73 (1995) 534.

    Google Scholar 

  11. D. H. Gehl and S. H. Payne, ibid. 28 (1972) 439.

    Google Scholar 

  12. K. Asgar, in “Dental Biomaterials-Research Priorities”, (DHEW Publ No. (NIH) 74-548, 1973) p. 27.

  13. K. Asgar and A. H. Arfaei, J. Dent. Res. 56B (1977) 647.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Idem., J. Prosthet. Dent. 54 (1985) 60.

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. M. Meyer, C. P. Susz and R. Barraud, J. Dent. Res. 62 (1983) 342.

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. R. Mackert and J. P. Moffa, ibid. 54 (1975) 355.

    Google Scholar 

  17. M. T. Barreto, A. J. Goldberg, D. A. Nitkin and G. Mumford, J. Prosthet. Dent. 44 (1980) 504.

    Google Scholar 

  18. P. F. Vincent, L. Steven and K. E. Basford, ibid. 37 (1977) 527.

    Google Scholar 

  19. P. J. Brockhurst, V. G. Mclaverty and Z. Kasloff, Oper. Dent. 8 (1983) 130.

    Google Scholar 

  20. C. Bessing, Acta Odontol. Scand. 44 (1986) 165.

    Google Scholar 

  21. R. P. Whitlock, R. W. Hinman, G. T. Eden, J. A. Tesk, G. Dickson and E. E. Parry, J. Dent. Res. 60 (1981) 374.

    Google Scholar 

  22. R. H. Jarvis, T. J. Jenkins and L. A. Tedesco, J. Prosthet. Dent. 51 (1984) 490.

    Google Scholar 

  23. R. A. Kaminski, K. J. Anusavice, T. Okabe, P. K. Morse and P. E. Casteel, ibid. 53 (1985) 329.

    Google Scholar 

  24. S. E. Reagan and J. C. Kois, Quintessence Dent. Techno. 9 (1985) 667.

    Google Scholar 

  25. R. W. Hinman, J. A. Tesk, R. P. Whitlock, E. E. Parry and J. S. Durkowski, J. Dent. Res. 64 (1985) 134.

    Google Scholar 

  26. J. Takahashi, J. Z. Zhang and M. Okazaki, Dent. Mater. J. 12 (1993) 238.

    Google Scholar 

  27. T. Aoki, Tsurumi Dent. J. 22 (1996) 15.

    Google Scholar 

  28. C. Bessing and M. Bergman, Scand. Dent. J. 16 (1992) 109.

    Google Scholar 

  29. M. Syverud, T. Okabe and H. Herø, Eur. J. Oral Sci. 103 (1995) 327.

    Google Scholar 

  30. K. Tajima, S. Matsuda, S. Kitajima, Y. Yokoyama, H. Kakigawa and Y. Kozono, Dent. Mater. J. 13 (1994) 206.

    Google Scholar 

  31. J. Takahashi, J. Z. Zhang and M. Okazaki, ibid. 12 (1993) 245.

    Google Scholar 

  32. K. Watanabe, S. Okawa, O. Miyakawa, S. Nakano, N. Shiokawa and M. Kobayashi, ibid. 10 (1991) 128.

    Google Scholar 

  33. “Metals Handbook”, Volume 15, Casting (American Society for Metals, Metals Park, OH, 1988).

  34. K. Watanabe, J. Japan Inst. Metals 61 (1997) 662.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Watanabe, I., Woldu, M., Watanabe, K. et al. Effect of casting method on castability of titanium and dental alloys. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine 11, 547–553 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008972018025

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008972018025

Keywords

Navigation