Skip to main content
Log in

Cancer patients as `experts' in defining quality of life domains. A multicentre survey by the Italian Group for the Evaluation of Outcomes in Oncology (IGEO)

  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although the subjective nature of quality of life is generally accepted, less attention has been paid to the procedure of selecting domains to be explored with questionnaires. To explore what contributes to cancer patients' quality of life, a survey was conducted with the aim of identifying contents of quality of life using cancer patients as `experts'. A questionnaire with open-ended items aimed at exploring the meaning of quality of life and at determining the contents of health and not health related quality of life, was submitted to a sample of cancer patients stratified by residence, cancer site and stage of disease. The 248 questionnaires received were transcribed and broken down into phrases to allow coding. A content analysis was performed, using as a conceptual framework, the domains identified by the Italian Society of Psycho-Oncology. Overall, 43 domains and a list of symptoms were identified. The two most frequently reported symptoms were pain (21.4% patients) and fatigue (14.1% patients). Social relationships and psychological domains were heavily represented. Twenty sub-domains related to the domain `psychological well-being'. This study suggests that information on the content of quality of life questionnaires to be submitted to people affected by a specific disease, should be derived by studying people suffering the specific disease. These results reinforce the criticism that available quality of life instruments are more likely to reflect the perspective of health professionals than patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Editorial. Quality of life and clinical trials. Lancet 1995; 346: 1-2.

  2. Cella D. Quality of life measurement: Present and future. The 10th World Congress of Psycho-Oncology, New York, Oct 3-6 1996.

  3. Leplege A, Hunt S. The problem of quality of life. JAMA 1997; 278: 47-50.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ganz PA, Schag CAC, Lie JJ, Polinky ML, Tan S. Breast conserving versus mastectomy. Is there a difference in psychological adjustment or quality of life in the year after surgery? Cancer 1992; 69: 1729-1738.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Donovan K, Sanson-Fisher RW, Redman S. Measuring quality of life in cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 1989; 959-968.

  6. Ferrel B. The quality of life: 1525 voices of cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum 1996; 23: 909-916.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Slevin ML, Plant H, Lynch D, Drinkwater J, Gregor WM. Who should measure quality of life, doctor or the patient? Brit J Cancer 1988; 57: 109-112.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Siegrist J, Junge A. Conceptual and methodological prob-lems in research on the quality of life in clinical medicine. Soc Sci Med 1989; 29: 463-468.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cella D. Quality of life: Concepts and definition. J Pain Symptom Manage 1994; 9: 186-192.

    Google Scholar 

  10. The WHOQOL Groups. The World Health Organisation Quality of Life assessment (WHOQOL): Position paper from the World Health Organisation. Soc Sci Med 1995; 41: 1403.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Costantini M, Mencaglia E, Di Giulio P, et al. La valutazione della qualità di vita in oncologia. Razionale ed ob-iettivi della prima fase del progetto QvOnc. Tumori 1997; 83: 25-27.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Padilla GV, Ferrell B, Grant M, Rhiner M. Defining the content domain of quality of life for cancer patients with pain. Cancer Nurs 1990; 13: 108-115.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Italian Psycho-Oncology Society. Consensus Development Conference: Assessment of the quality of life in cancer clinical trials. Tumori 1992; 78: 151-154.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fleiss JL. Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportion. New York: Wiley, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gill TM, Feinstain AR. A critical appraisal of the quality of quality of life measurements. JAMA 1994; 272: 619-626.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Aaronson NK, Ahlezdai S, Bergman B, et al. The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: A quality of life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer I 1993; 85: 365-376.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cella DF, Tulsky DS, Gray G, et al. The functional as-sessment of cancer therapy scale: Development and validation of the general measure. J Clin Oncol 1993; 11: 570-579.

    Google Scholar 

  18. De Haes JCJM, Van Knippenberg FCE, Neijt JP. Measuring psychological and physical distress in cancer pa-tients: Structure and application of the Rotterdam Symptom Checklist. Br J Cancer 1990; 62: 1034-1038.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Schipper H, Clinch J, McMurray A, Lewitt M. Measuring the quality of life of cancer patients: The functional living index-cancer: Development and validation. J Clin Oncol 1984; 2: 472-483.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tamburini M, Rosso S, Gamba A, Mencaglia E, De Conno V, Ventafridda V. A therapy impact questionnaire for quality of life assessment in advanced cancer research. Ann Oncol 1992; 3: 565-570.

    Google Scholar 

  21. McCorkle R, Young K. Development of a symptom distress scale. Cancer Nurs 1978; 1: 373-378.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ware JE, Sherbourne C. The MOS 36-item short health survey (SF36). Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992; 30: 473-483

    Google Scholar 

  23. Guyatt GH, Feeny DH, Patrik DL. Measuring health related quality of life. Ann Intern Med 1993; 118: 622-629.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Bowling A. What things are important in people's lives? A survey of the public's judgements to inform scales of health related quality of life. Soc Sci Med 1995; 41: 1447-1462.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Silberfarb PM. Psychiatric problems in breast cancer. Cancer 1984; 53: 820-824.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Cohn KH. Chemotherapy from an insider's perspective. Lancet 1982; 1: 1006-1009.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Coates A, Abrahams S, Kaye SB, et al. On the receiving end patient perception of the side effects of cancer chemotherapy. Eur J Clin Oncol 1983; 19: 203-208.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ferrans CE. Quality of life through the eyes of survivors of breast cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum 1994; 21: 1645-1651.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Bloom JR. Social support, accommodation to stress and adjustment to breast cancer. Soc Sci Med 1982; 16: 1329-1338.

    Google Scholar 

  30. King CR, Haberman M, Berry DL, et al. Quality of life and cancer experience: The state of the knowledge. Oncol Nurs Forum 1997; 24: 27-41.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Schain W, Edwards BK, Gorrel CR, et al. Psychosocial and physical outcomes of primary breast cancer therapy: Mastectomy vs. excisional biopsy and irradiation. Breast Cancer Res Treat 1983; 3: 377-382.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Coates A, Fisher Dillenbeck C, McNeil DR, et al. On the receiving end II Linear Analogue Self Assessment (LASA) 158 in evaluation of aspects of the quality of life of cancer patients receiving therapy. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 1983; 1633-1637.

  33. Wyatt G, Kurtz M, Liken M. Breast cancer survivors: An exploration of quality of life issues. Cancer Nurs 1993; 16: 440-448.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Montazeri A, Lilroy R, Gillis CR, Mc Ewen J. Quality of life: Perception of lung cancer patients. Eur J Cancer 1996; 32: 2284-2289.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Lynn M. Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Res 1988; 35: 382-385.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Speca M, Robinson JW, Goodey E, Frizzel B. Patients evaluate a quality of life scale. Cancer Pract 1994; 2: 365-370.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Costantini, M., Mencaglia, E., Giulio, P. et al. Cancer patients as `experts' in defining quality of life domains. A multicentre survey by the Italian Group for the Evaluation of Outcomes in Oncology (IGEO). Qual Life Res 9, 151–159 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008967104082

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008967104082

Navigation