Abstract
The paper describes a multivariable statistical regression technique for computing the 3D stress tensor applied to the shut-in pressure data obtained on fractures during in-situ stress measurement by hydraulic fracturing in a short borehole. This method computes the mean value of components of the 3D stress tensor and their confidence intervals at a desired confidence level. This has been applied to the data of shut-in pressure from Narwapahar mine, India and Kamaishi mine, Japan. The computed in-situ stress tensor is corroborated with that obtained by other methods.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amadei, B. and Stephansson, O. (1997) Rock Stress and its Measurement, Chapman and Hall, London, p. 490.
Box, G. E., Hunter, W. G. and Hunter, J. S. (1978) Statistics for Experimenters. John Wiley and Sons, New York, p. 653.
Cornet, F. H. and Valette, B. (1984) In-situ stress determination from hydraulic injection test data, J. Geophysics. Res. 89, 11527–11537
Haimson, B. C. (1978) The hydrofracturing stress measuring method and recent field results, Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sc. Geomech. Abstr. 15, 167–178.
Hayashi, K., Sato, A. and Ito, T. (1997) In-situ stress measurements by hydraulic fracturing for a rock mass with many planes of weakness. Int. J. Rock Mech.Mining. Sci. 34(1), 45–58.
Jaeger, J. C. and Cook, N. G. W. (1979) Fundamentals of Rock Mechanics, 3rd Ed. Chapman and Hall, London, p. 593.
Sahoo, B. C. (1997) In-situ stress measurement by hydraulic fracturing technique and stress analysis by numerical modelling. M. Tech. Thesis, Dept. of Mining Eng., Indian School of Mines, Dhanbad, India.
Zou, D. H. (1995) Statistical regression applied to borehole strain measurement data analysis. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 13, 17–27.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Singh, U.K., Sahoo, B.C. Computing the 3D in-situ stress field from shut-in pressure data using statistical regression. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering 18, 119–137 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008961423474
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008961423474