Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

How well do elderly people complete individualised quality of life measures: An exploratory study

  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This research note describes and discusses a study which investigated the feasibility of using an individualised approach to measure the quality of life (QoL) of a sample of older people who were in receipt of an early hospital discharge service. Most participants (86%) were able to identify areas of their lives which were important to them, rate their level of functioning on each of these areas and rank their life areas in order of importance. However, 39% were unable to quantify the relative importance of each area of life. Indeed, the majority (57%) of participants who were over 75 years old could not complete this ‘weighting’ or evaluative stage. The results suggest that the phenomenological approach to measuring QoL may be employed successfully with older people but that the ‘weighting’ system used by existing individualised QoL measures needs to be refined, especially when assessing people over 75.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Katz S, Ford AB, Moskowitz RW. The index of ADL: A standardised measure of biological and psychosocial func-tion. JAMA 1963; 185: 914–919.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: The Barthel Index. Maryland State Med J 1965; 14: 61–65.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Duke University Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development. Multidimensional Functional Assessment: The OARS Methodology. Durham: NC, 1978.

  4. Pfeiffer E, Johnson TM, Chiofolo RC. Functional assess-ment of elderly subjects in four service settings. J Am Geriatr Soc 1981; 29: 433–437.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Allison PJ, Locker D, Feine JS. Quality of life: A dynamic construct. Soc Sci Med 1997; 45: 221–230.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Pearlman RA, Uhlmann RF. Quality of life in chronic diseases: Perceptions of elderly patients. J Gerontol 1988; 43: M25–M30.

    Google Scholar 

  7. O'Boyle CA. Measuring the quality of later life. Philos Trans Roy Soc Lon – Biol Sci 1997; 352: 1871–1879.

    Google Scholar 

  8. O'Boyle CA, Browne J, Hickey A, McGee HM, Joyce CRB. Schedule for the Evaluation of Individual Quality of Life (SEIQoL) Administration Manual. Dublin: Depart-ment of Psychology, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ruta DA, Garratt AM, Leng M, Russell IT, MacDonald LM. A new approach to the measurement of quality of life: The Patient Generated Index. Med Care 1994; 32: 1109–1126.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Amir M, Bar-On D, Penso R. Positive–Negative Evalua-tion (PNE) scale: A new dimension of the subjective do-mains of quality of life measure. Qual Life Res 1996; 5: 73–80.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hickey AM, Bury G, O'Boyle CA, Bradley F, O'Kelly FD, Shannon W. A new short form individual quality of life measure (SEIQoL-DW): Application in a cohort of individuals with HIV/AIDS. Br Med J 1996; 313: 29–33.

    Google Scholar 

  12. O'Boyle CA, McGee H, Hickey A, O'Malley K, Joyce CRB. Individual quality of life in patients undergoing hip replacement. Lancet 1992; 339: 1088–1091.

    Google Scholar 

  13. McGee HM, O'Boyle CA, Hickey A, O'Malley K, Joyce CRB. Assessing the quality of life of the individual: The SEIQoL with a healthy and a gastroenterology unit popu-lation. Psychol Med 1991; 21: 749–759.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jenkinson C, Stradling J, Petersen S. How should we evaluate health status? A comparison of three methods in patients presenting with obstructive sleep apnoea. Qual Life Res 1998; 7: 95–100.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Herd RM, Tidman MJ, Ruta DA, Hunter JA. Measure-ment of quality of life in atopic dermatitis: Correlation and validation of two different methods. Br J Dermatol 1997; 136: 502–507.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bar-On D, Amir M. Re-examining quality of life of hy-pertensives: A new self-structured measure. Am J Hyper-tension 1993; 6: 62S–66S.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Browne JP, O'Boyle CA, McGee HM, et al. Individual quality of life in the healthy elderly. Qual Life Res 1994; 3: 235–244.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Coen R, O'Mahony D, O'Boyle C, Joyce CRB, Hiltbrunner B, Walsh JB. Measuring the quality of life of dementia patients using the Schedule for the Evaluation of Individual Quality of Life. Irish J Psychol 1993; 14: 154–163.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Browne JP, O'Boyle CA, McGee HM, McDonald NJ, Joyce CR. Development of a direct weighting procedure for quality of life domains. Qual Life Res 1997; 6: 301–309.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Korten AE, Henderson AS, Christensen H, et al. A pro-spective study of cognitive function in the elderly. Psychol Med 1997; 27: 919–930.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mangione CM, Seddon JM, Cook EF, et al. Correlates of cognitive function scores in elderly outpatients. J Am Geriatr Soc 1993; 41: 491–497.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Health and Social Care Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, The Queen's University of Belfast, Belfast, UK

    Martin Dempster & Michael Donnelly

Authors
  1. Martin Dempster
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michael Donnelly
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dempster, M., Donnelly, M. How well do elderly people complete individualised quality of life measures: An exploratory study. Qual Life Res 9, 369–375 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008959925664

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008959925664

Search

Navigation