Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Construction of Gene-Targeting Vectors: a Rapid Mu in vitro DNA Transposition-Based Strategy Generating Null, Potentially Hypomorphic, and Conditional Alleles

  • Published:
Transgenic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Gene targeting into mammalian genomes by means of homologous recombination is a powerful technique for analyzing gene function through generation of transgenic animals. Hundreds of mouse strains carrying targeted alleles have already been created and recent modifications of the technology, in particular generation of conditional alleles, have extended the usefulness of the methodology for a variety of special purposes. Even though the standard protocols, including the construction of gene-targeting vector plasmids, are relatively straightforward, they typically involve time-consuming and laborious gene mapping and/or sequencing steps. To produce various types of gene-targeting constructions rapidly and with minimum effort, we developed a strategy, that utilizes a highly efficient in vitro transposition reaction of phage Mu, and tested it in a targeting of the mouse Kcc2 gene locus. A vast number and different types of targeting constructions can be generated simultaneously with little or no prior sequence knowledge of the gene locus of interest. This quick and efficient general strategy will facilitate easy generation of null, potentially hypomorphic, and conditional alleles. Especially useful it will be in the cases when effects of several exons within a given gene are to be studied, a task that necessarily will involve generation of multiple constructions. The strategy extends the use of diverse recombination reactions for advanced genome engineering and complements existing recombination-based approaches for generation of gene-targeting constructions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aiyar A, Hindmarsh P, Skalka AM and Leis J (1996) Concerted integration of linear retroviral DNA by the avian sarcoma virus integrase in vitro: dependence on both long terminal repeat termini. J Virol 70: 3571–3580.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angrand P-O, Daigle N, van der Hoeven F, Scholer HR and Stewart AF (1999) Simplified generation of targeting constructs using ET recombination. Nucleic Acids Res 27: e16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akiyama K, Watanabe H, Tsukada S and Sasai H (2000) A novel method for constructing gene-targeting vectors. Nucleic Acids Res 28: e77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ausubel FM, Brent R, Kingston RE, Moore DD, Seidman JG, Smith JA et al. (1989) Curr Protocols Mol Biol 1: 1.8.4.–1.8.10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beall EL and Rio DC (1998) Transposase makes critical contacts with, and is stimulated by, single-stranded DNA at the P element termini in vitro. EMBO J 17: 2122–2136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biery MC, Stewart FJ, Stellwagen AE, Raleigh EA and Craig NL (2000) A simple in vitro Tn7-based transposition system with low target site selectivity for genome and gene analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 28: 1067–1077.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchholz F, Angrand P-O and Stewart AF (1996) A simple assay to determine the functionality of Cre or FLP recombination targets in genomic manipulation constructs. Nucleic Acids Res 24: 3118–3119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capecchi MR (1989) The new mouse genetics: altering the genome by gene targeting. Trends Genet 5: 70–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaconas G, Lavoie BD and Watson MA (1996) DNA transposition: jumping gene machine, some assembly required. Curr Biol 6: 817–820.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers RM and Kleckner N (1994) Tn10/IS10 transposase purification, activation, and in vitro reaction. J Biol Chem 269: 8029–8035.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craigie R and Mizuuchi K (1987) Transposition of Mu DNA: joining of Mu to target DNA can be uncoupled from cleavage at the ends of Mu. Cell 51: 493–501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devine SE and Boeke JD (1994) Efficient integration of artificial transposons into plasmid targets in vitro: a useful tool for DNA mapping, sequencing and genetic analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 22: 3765–3772.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellison V, Abrams H, Roe T, Lifson J and Brown P (1990). Human immunodeficiency virus integration in a cell-free system. J Virol 64: 2711–2715.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goryshin IY and Reznikoff WS (1998) Tn5 in vitro transposition. J Biol Chem 273: 7367–7374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin TJ IV, Parsons L, Leschziner AE, DeVost J, Derbyshire KM and Grindley ND (1999) in vitro transposition of Tn552: a tool for DNA sequencing and mutagenesis. Nucleic Acids Re 27: 3859–3865.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haapa S, Taira S, Heikkinen E and Savilahti H (1999a) An efficient and accurate integration of mini-Mu transposons in vitro: a general methodology for functional genetic analysis and molecular biology applications. Nucleic Acids Res 27: 2777–2784.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haapa S, Suomalainen S, Eerikäinen S, Airaksinen M, Paulin L and Savilahti H (1999b) An efficient DNA sequencing strategy based on the bacteriophage Mu in vitro DNA transposition reaction. Genome Res 9: 308–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallet B, Sherratt DJ and Hayes F (1997) Pentapeptide scanning mutagenesis: random insertion of a variable five amino acid cassette in a target protein. Nucleic Acids Res 25: 1866–1867.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasty P, Abuin A and Bradley A (2000) Gene targeting, principles, and practice in mammalian cells. In: Joyner AL. (ed) Gene Targeting, a Practical Approach, 2nd edition (pp. 1–35) Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiom K, Melek M and Gellert M (1998) DNA transposition by the RAG1 and RAG2 proteins: a possible source of oncogenic translocations. Cell 94: 463–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koes R, Souer E, Houwelingen AV, Mur L, Spelt C, Quattrocchio F, et al. (1995) Targeted gene inactivation in petunia by PCRbased selection of transposon insertion mutants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92: 8149–8153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lampe DJ, Churchill ME and Robertson HM (1996) A purified mariner transposase is sufficient to mediate transposition in vitro. EMBO J 15: 5470–5479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyers EN, Lewandoski M and Martin GR (1998) An Fgf8 mutant allelic series generated by Cre-and Flp-mediated recombination. Nature Genet 18: 136–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mizuuchi K (1992) Transpositional recombination: mechanistic insights from studies of Mu and other elements. Annu Rev Biochem 61: 1011–1051.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagy A and Rossant J (1996) Targeted mutagenesis: analysis of phenotype without germ line transmission. J Clin Invest 97: 1360–1365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagy A, Rossant J, Nagy R, Abramow-Newerly W and Roder JC (1993) Derivation of completely cell culture-derived mice from early-passage embryonic stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90: 8424–8428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagy A, Moens C, Ivanyi E, Pawling J, Gertsenstein M, Hadjantonakis AK, et al. (1998) Dissecting the role of N-myc in development using a single targeting vector to generate a series of alleles. Curr Biol 8: 661–664.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partanen J, Schwartz L and Rossant J (1998) Opposite phenotypes of hypomorphic and Y766 phosphorylation site mutations reveal a function for Fgfr1 in anteroposterior patterning of mouse embryos. Genes Dev 12: 2332–2344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne JA, Stevenson TJ and Donaldson LF (1996) Molecular characterization of a putative K-Cl cotransporter in rat brain. A neuronal-specific isoform. J Biol Chem 271: 16245–16252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raymond CK, Pownder TA and Sexson SL (1999) General method for plasmid construction using homologous recombination. Biotechniques 26: 134–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivera C, Voipio J, Payne JA, Ruusuvuori E, Lahtinen H, Lämsä K, et al. (1999) The KC/Cl-co-transporter KCC2 renders GABA hyperpolarizing during neuronal maturation. Nature 397: 251–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sambrook J, Fritch EF and Maniatis T (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 2nd edition. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauer B (1998) Inducible gene targeting in mice using the Cre/lox system. Methods 14: 381–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savilahti H, Rice PA and Mizuuchi K (1995) The phage Mu transpososome core: DNA requirements for assembly and function. EMBO J 14: 4893–4903.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh IR, Crowley RA and Brown PO (1997) High-resolution functional mapping of a cloned gene by genetic footprinting. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94: 1304–1309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soukharev S, Miller JL and Sauer B (1999) Segmental genomic replacement in embryonic stem cells by double lox targeting. Nucleic Acids Res 27: e21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storck T, Krüth U, Kolhekar R, Sprengel R and Seeburg PH (1996) Rapid construction in yeast of complex targeting vectors for gene manipulation in the mouse. Nucleic Acids Res 24: 4594–4596.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taira S, Tuimala J, Roine E, Nurmiaho-Lassila EL, Savilahti H and Romantschuk M (1999) Mutational analysis of the Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato hrpA gene encoding Hrp pilus subunit. Mol Microbiol 34: 737–744.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas KR and Capecchi MR (1987) Site-directed mutagenesis by gene targeting in mouse embryo-derived stem cells. Cell 51: 503–512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torres RM and Kühn R (1997) Laboratory protocols for conditional gene targeting. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tosi LR and Beverley SM (2000) cis and trans factors affecting Mos1 mariner evolution and transposition in vitro, and its potential for functional genomics. Nucleic Acids Res 28: 784–790.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vos JC, De Baere I and Plasterk RH (1996) Transposase is the only nematode protein required for in vitro transposition of Tc1. Genes Dev 10: 755–761.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westphal CH and Leder P (1997) Transposon-generated “knockout” and “knock-in” gene-targeting constructs for use in mice. Curr Biol 7: 530–533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams JR, Sharp JW, Kumari VG, Wilson M, Payne JA (1999) The neuron-specific K-Cl cotransporter, KCC2. Antibody development and initial characterization of the protein. J Biol Chem 274: 12656–12664.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood SA, Allen ND, Rossant J, Auerbach A and Nagy A (1993) Non-injection methods for the production of embryonic stem cell-embryo chimaeras. Nature 365: 87–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang XW, Model P and Heintz N (1997) Homologous recombination based modification in Escherichia coli and germline transmission in transgenic mice of a bacterial artificial chromosome. Nature Biotechnol 15: 859–865.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwaal RR, Broeks A, van Meyers J, Groenen JTM and Plasterk RHA (1993) Target-selected gene inactivation in Caenorhabditis elegans by using a frozen transposon insertion mutant bank. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90: 7431–7435.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vilen, H., Eerikäinen, S., Tornberg, J. et al. Construction of Gene-Targeting Vectors: a Rapid Mu in vitro DNA Transposition-Based Strategy Generating Null, Potentially Hypomorphic, and Conditional Alleles. Transgenic Res 10, 69–80 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008959231644

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008959231644

Navigation