Skip to main content
Log in

Mr Hobbes Goes to Australia: Law, Politics and Difference

  • Published:
International Journal for the Semiotics of Law Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using current conservative discourses about the nation state in Australia as an example,the paper notices how the image of the (male-sexed) body is used to enhance theauthority of the same (white ``neutral'' agents of largely foreign capital)against the claims of difference (non-white refugees, women, Aboriginal people).The paper notices that far from protecting minority and difference, as liberalismleads one to expect, the law uses the same body image of itself to repeat theoppression. Legal education inscribes the masculinity of the phallus in thebodies and minds of its students. Other masculinity, the female, the``native'' are identified by the law rather than self-identifiedin the law after negotiation with the law.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Duncanson, I. Mr Hobbes Goes to Australia: Law, Politics and Difference. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law 13, 279–303 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008956928798

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008956928798

Keywords

Navigation