Cancer Causes & Control

, Volume 10, Issue 6, pp 525–537 | Cite as

Social class, race/ethnicity, and incidence of breast, cervix, colon, lung, and prostate cancer among Asian, black, Hispanic, and white residents of the San Francisco Bay Area, 1988–92 (United States)

  • Nancy Krieger
  • Charles QuesenberryJr
  • Tiffany Peng
  • Pamela Horn-Ross
  • Susan Stewart
  • Susan Brown
  • Karen Swallen
  • Tessie Guillermo
  • Dong Suh
  • Luz Alvarez-Martinez
  • Felicia Ward


Background: To date only eight US studies have simultaneously examined cancer incidence in relation to social class and race/ethnicity; all but one included only black and white Americans. To address gaps in knowledge we thus investigated socioeconomic gradients in cancer incidence among four mutually exclusive US racial/ethnic groups – Asian and Pacific Islander, black, Hispanic, and white – for five major cancer sites: breast, cervix, colon, lung, and prostate cancer.

Methods: We generated age-adjusted cancer incidence rates stratified by socioeconomic position using: (a) geocoded cancer registry records, (b) census population counts, and (c) 1990 census block-group socioeconomic measures. Cases (n = 70,899) were diagnosed between 1988 and 1992 and lived in seven counties located in California's San Francisco Bay Area.

Results: Incidence rates varied as much if not more by socioeconomic position than by race/ethnicity, and for each site the magnitude – and in some cases direction – of the socioeconomic gradient differed by race/ethnicity and, where applicable, by gender. Breast cancer incidence increased with affluence only among Hispanic women. Incidence of cervical cancer increased with socioeconomic deprivation among all four racial/ethnic groups, with trends strongest among white women. Lung cancer incidence increased with socioeconomic deprivation among all but Hispanics, for whom incidence increased with affluence. Colon and prostate cancer incidence were inconsistently associated with socioeconomic position.

Conclusions: These complex patterns defy easy generalization and illustrate why US cancer data should be stratified by socioeconomic position, along with race/ethnicity and gender, so as to improve cancer surveillance, research, and control.

cancer incidence census data poverty race/ethnicity socioeconomic position 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Kogevinas M, Pearce N, Susser M, Boffetta P (eds) (1997) Social Inequalities and Cancer. IARC Scientific Publications no. 138. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer/World Health Organization.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Williams DR, Collins C (1995) US socioeconomic and racial differences in health: patterns and explanations. Annu Rev Sociol 21: 349-386.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Krieger N, Rowley DL, Herman AA, Avery B, Phillips MT (1993) Racism, sexism, and social class: implications for studies of health, disease, and well-being. Am J Prev Med 9(Suppl 2): 82-122.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ernster VL, Selvin S, Sacks ST, Austin DF, Brown SM, Winklestein W Jr (1978) Prostatic cancer; mortality and incidence rates by race and social class. Am J Epidemiol 107: 311-320Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Devesa SS, Diamond EL (1980) Association of breast cancer and cervical cancer incidence with income and education among whites and blacks. J Natl Cancer Inst 65: 515-527.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Devesa SS, Diamond EL (1983) Socioeconomic and racial differences in lung cancer incidence. Am J Epidemiol 118: 818-831.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    McWhorter WP, Schatzkin AG, Horm JW, Brown CC (1989) Contribution of socioeconomic status to black/white differences in cancer incidence. Cancer 63: 982-989.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Krieger N (1990) Social class and the black/white crossover in the age-specific incidence of breast cancer: a study linking censusderived data to population-based registry records. Am J Epidemiol 131: 804-814.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bacquet CR, Horm JW, Gibbs T, Greenwald P (1991) Socioeconomic factors and cancer incidence among blacks and whites. J Natl Cancer Inst 83: 551-557.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gorey KM, Vena JE (1995) The association of near poverty status with cancer incidence among black and white adults. J Commun Health 20: 359-366.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Liu L, Deapen D, Bernstein L (1998) Socioeconomic status and cancers of the female breast and reproductive organs: a comparison across racial/ethnic populations in Los Angeles County, California (United States). Cancer Causes Control 9: 369-380.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Krieger N, Chen JT, Ebel G (1997) Can we monitor socioeconomic inequalities in health? A survey of US Health Departments' data collection and reporting practices. Public Health Reports 112: 481-491.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Krieger N, Williams D, Moss N (1997) Measuring social class in US public health research: concepts, methodologies and guidelines. Annu Rev Public Health 18: 341-378.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Krieger N (1992) Overcoming the absence of socioeconomic data in medical records: validation and application of a census-based methodology. Am J Public Health 82: 703-710.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wingo PA, Ries LAG, Rosenberg HM, Miller DS, Edwards BK (1998) Cancer incidence and mortality, 1973–1995: a report card for the US. Cancer 82: 1197-1207.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Glaser SL, Satariano ER, Leung RW, Prehn AW, Cady CM, West DW (eds) (1995) Cancer Incidence by Race/Ethnicity in the San Francisco Bay Area: Twenty years of cancer reporting 1973–1992. Union City, CA: Northern California Cancer Center.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Census of Population and Housing (1990) Summary Tape File 3 Technical Documentation, prepared by the Bureau of the Census. Washington, DC: The Bureau, 1991.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Stewart SL, Swallen K, Glaser SL, Horn-Ross PL, West DW (1998) Adjustment of cancer incidence rates for ethnic misclassification. Biometrics 54: 774-781.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Boyle P, Parkin DM (1991) Statistical methods for registries. In: Jensen OM, Parkin DM, MacLennan R, Muir CS, Skeet RG, eds. Cancer Registration: Principles and Methods (IARC Scientific Publication no. 95). Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer, pp. 126-158.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    SAS Institute Inc (1996) SAS/STAT software: changes and enhancements through Release 6.11. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Census undercount and the quality of health data for racial and ethnic populations (1994) Ethnicity Dis 4: 98-100.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kaufman JS, Cooper RS, McGee DL (1997) Socioeconomic status and health in blacks and whites: the problem of residual confounding and the resiliency of race. Epidemiology 8: 621-628.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    van Loon AJ, Brug J, Goldbohm RA, van den Brandt PA, Brug J (1995) Differences in cancer incidence and mortality among socioeconomic groups. Scand J Soc Med 23: 110-120.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    van Loon AJ, Goldbohm RA, van den Brandt PA (1994) Socioeconomic status and breast cancer incidence: a prospective cohort study. Int J Epidemiol 23: 899-905.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kelsey JL, Horn-Ross PL (1993) Breast cancer: magnitude of the problem and descriptive epidemiology. Epidemiol Rev 15: 7-16.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Krieger N (1989) Exposure, susceptibility, and breast cancer risk: a hypothesis regarding exogenous carcinogens, breast tissue development, and social gradients, including black/white differences, in breast cancer incidence. Breast Cancer Res Treat 13: 205-223.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Smith D, Taylor R, Coates M (1996) Socioeconomic differentials in cancer incidence and mortality in urban New South Wales, 1987–1991. Austral NZ J Public Health 20: 129-137.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Herrero R (1996) Epidemiology of cervical cancer. Mongr Natl Cancer Inst 21: 1-6.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Doyal L (1995) What Makes Women Sick? Gender and the Political Economy of Health. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Zierler S, Krieger N (1997) Reframing women's risk: social inequalities and HIV infection. Annu Rev Public Health 18: 401-436.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Troutt DD (1993) The Thin Red Line: How the Poor Still Pay More. Oakland, CA: West Coast Regional Office of Consumers Union.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    van Loon AJ, Goldbohm RA, Kant IJ, Swaen GM, Kremer AM, van den Brandt PA (1997) Socioeconomic status and lung cancer incidence in men in The Netherlands: is there a role for occupational exposure? J Epidemiol Commun Health 51: 24-29.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Graham H (1993) When Life's a Drag: Women, Smoking and Disadvantage. Department of Health. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kerner JF, Breen N, Tefft MC, Silsby J (1998) Tobacco use among multi-ethnic Latino populations. Ethnic Dis 8: 167-183.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Harvei S, Kravdal O (1997) The importance of marital and Socioeconomic status in incidence and survival of prostate cancer. An analysis of complete Norwegian birth cohorts. Prev Med 26: 623-632.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Merrill RM, Brawley OW (1997) Prostate cancer incidence and mortality rates among white and black men. Epidemiology 8: 126-131.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Freeman HP (1998) The meaning of race for science-considerations in the National Cancer Program. President's Cancer Panel Meeting, 9 April, 1997. Cancer 82: 219-225.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (1993) Use of race and ethnicity in public health surveillance. Summary of the CDC/ATSDR Workshop. MMWR 42(no. RR-10).Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Massey DS (1996) The age of extremes: concentrated affluence and poverty in the twenty-first century. Demography 33: 395-412.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nancy Krieger
    • 1
  • Charles QuesenberryJr
    • 2
  • Tiffany Peng
    • 2
  • Pamela Horn-Ross
    • 3
  • Susan Stewart
    • 3
  • Susan Brown
    • 3
  • Karen Swallen
    • 3
  • Tessie Guillermo
    • 4
  • Dong Suh
    • 4
  • Luz Alvarez-Martinez
    • 5
  • Felicia Ward
    • 6
  1. 1.Department of Health and Social BehaviorHarvard School of Public HealthBoston
  2. 2.Division of ResearchKaiser Foundation Research InstituteOaklandUSA
  3. 3.Northern California Cancer CenterUnion CityUSA
  4. 4.Asian and Pacific Islander American Health ForumSan FranciscoUSA
  5. 5.National Latina Health OrganizationOaklandUSA
  6. 6.Bay Area Black Women's Health ProjectOaklandUSA

Personalised recommendations