Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Ecological assessment of vegetation from a nature reserve using regional reference data and indicator scores

  • Published:
Biodiversity & Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A method is presented for ecological assessment of botanical sample data from a nature reserve network. The approach uses regional floristic survey data for a specific biotope as a context for spatial and temporal comparison. Assessments are based upon floristic similarity to reference vegetation types and indicator scores that summarise multivariate plant species data in relation to important environmental gradients. The approach was implemented as a software tool using floristic survey data for soligenous mires in a UK region. Plant community monitoring data were assessed against reference communities from this regional baseline to illustrate the potential advantages of the method. These include; (a) allowing links to be made between multivariate plant species data and measurements of environmental drivers, (b) providing realistic assessments of spatial and temporal differences because comparisons are against typical values of indicator scores for the region, (c) providing the scope for setting realistic criteria for vegetation monitoring.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Clapham AR, Tutin TG and Moore DM (1987) The Flora of the British Isles, 3rd edition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper E and Mackintosh J (1996) NVC review of Scottish grassland surveys. Scottish Natural Heritage Review no. 65. Scottish Natural Heritage, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Critchley CNR, Smart SM, Poulton SMC and Myers GM (1996) Monitoring the consequences of vegetation management in Environmentally Sensitive Areas. In: Vegetation Management in forestry, amenity and conservation areas. Aspects of Applied Biology 44: 193–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Dayton PK, Tegner MJ, Edwards PB and Riser KL (1998) Sliding baselines, ghosts and reduced expectations in kelp forest communities. Ecol. Appl. 8: 309–322

    Google Scholar 

  • Diekmann M (1995) Use and improvement of Ellenberg's indicator values in deciduous forests of the Boreo-nemoral zone in Sweden. Ecography 18: 178–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Diekmann M and Dupre C (1997) Acidification and eutrophication of deciduous forests in northwestern Germany demonstrated by indicator species analysis. J. Veg. Sci. 8: 855–864

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellenberg H, Weber HE, Dull R, Wirth V, Werner W and Paulissen D (1991) Zeigerwerte von Pflanzen in Mitteleuropa. Scripta Geobotanica 18: 1–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Ertsen ACD, Alkemade JRM and Wassen MJ (1998) Calibrating Ellenberg indictaor values for moisture, acidity, nutrient availability and salinity in the Netherlands. Plant Ecology 135: 113–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Fojt W and Harding M (1995) Thirty years of change in the vegetation communities of three valley mires in Suffolk, England. J. Appl. Ecol. 32: 561–577

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson CWD and Brown VK (1992) Grazing and vegetation change: deflected or modified succession. J. Appl. Ecol. 29: 120–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Goslee SC, Brooks RP and Cole CA (1997) Plants as indicators of wetland water source. Plant Ecology 131: 199–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Grime JP, Hodgson JG, Hunt R and Thompson K (1995) The Electronic Comparative Plant Ecology. Chapman & Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Grootjans AP, Schipper PC and Van der Windt HJ (1985) Influence of drainage on N-mineralisation and vegetation response in wet meadows. I. Calthion palustris stands. Acta Oecologia / Oecologia Plantarum 6: 403–417

    Google Scholar 

  • Grootjans AP, Fresco LFM, de Leeuw CC and Schipper PC (1996)Degeneration of species-rich Calthion palustris hay meadows: some considerations on the community concept. J. Veg. Sci. 7: 185–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding M (1993) Redgrave and Lopham fens, East Anglia, England: a case study of change in flora and fauna due to groundwater abstraction. Biol. Cons. 66: 35–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill MO and Carey PD (1997) Prediction of yield in the Rothamsted Park Grass experiment by Ellenberg indicator values. J. Veg. Sci. 8: 574–579

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill MO, Mountford JO, Roy DB and Bunce RGH (1999) Ellenberg's indicator values for British plants. ECOFACT Volume 2, Technical Annex. Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions: ITE Monkswood, Huntingdon

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill MO, Roy DB, Mountford JO and Bunce RGH (in press) Extending Ellenberg's indicator values to a new area: an algorithmic approach. J. Appl. Ecol.

  • Hodgson JG (1991) Management for the conservation of plants with particular reference to the British flora. In: Spellerberg IF, Goldsmith FB and Morris MG (eds) The Scientific Management of Temperate Communities for Conservation, pp 81–102, 31st Symposium of the British Ecological Society. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Jongman RHG, ter Braak CJF and van Tongeren OFR (1995) Data Analysis in Community and Landscape Ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Keymer RJ and Fry G (1996) Monitoring change. In: Lawson TG and Reed TM (eds) Nature Reserves-Who Needs Them?, pp 78–82 Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Peterborough

    Google Scholar 

  • Magurran AE (1988) Ecological Diversity and its Measurement. Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald AW(1993) The role of seedbank and sown seeds in the restoration of an English flood-meadow. J. Veg. Sci. 4: 395–400

    Google Scholar 

  • Melman CP, Clausman PHMA and Udo de Haes HA (1988) The testing of three indicator systems for trophic state in grasslands. Vegetatio 75: 143–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Mountford JO and Chapman JM (1993) Water regime requirements of British wetland vegetation: using the moisture classifications of Ellenberg and Londo. J. Env. Man. 38: 248–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Mountford JO, Lakhani KH and Kirkham FW (1993) Experimental assessment of the effects of nitrogen addition under hay-cutting and aftermath grazing on the vegtetation of meadows on a Somerset peat moor. J. Appl. Ecol. 30: 321–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Philippi TE, Dixon PM and Taylor BE (1998) Detecting trends in species composition. Ecol Appl. 8: 300–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfadenhauer J and Klötzli F (1996) Restoration experiments in middle European wet terrestrial ecosytems: an overview. Vegetatio 126: 101–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Radley GP (1994) Sand Dune Vegetation Survey of GB: a national inventory. Part 1: England. Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Peterborough

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodwell JS (1991a) British Plant Communities. Vol 1. Woodland and Scrub. CUP

  • Rodwell JS (1991b) British Plant Communities. Vol 2. Mires and Heaths. CUP

  • Rodwell JS (1992) British Plant Communities. Vol 3. Grasslands and Montane Communities. CUP

  • Rodwell JS, Pignatti S, Mucina L and Schaminée JHJ (1993) European vegetation survey: update on progress. J. Veg. Sci. 6: 759–762

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute Inc. (1988) SAS/STAT User's Guide, Release 6.03 Edition, pp 405–420. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith AJE (1978) The Moss Flora of Britain and Ireland. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • ter Braak CJF and Gremmen NJM (1987) Ecological amplitudes of plant species and the internal consistency of Ellenbergs' indicator values for moisture. Vegetatio 69: 79–87

    Google Scholar 

  • ter Braak CJF and Looman CWN (1986) Weighted averaging, logistic regression and the Gaussian response model. Vegetatio 65: 3–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Thimonier A, Dupouey JL, Bost F and Becker M (1994) Simultaneous eutrophication and acidification of a forest ecosystem in North-East France. New. Phytol. 126: 533–539

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson K, Hodgson JG, Grime JP, Rorison IH and Band SR (1993) Ellenberg numbers revisited. Phytocoenologia 23: 277–289

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Maarel E (1993) Relations between sociological-ecological species groups and Ellenberg indicator values. Phytocoenologia 23: 343–362

    Google Scholar 

  • Vyvey Q (1983) Study of the seed bank in Schoeno-juncetum subnodulosi All. 1922 and in Molinietum caerulae All. 1922. Acta Botanica Neerlandica 32: 246–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler BD (1988) Species richness, species rarity and conservation evaluation of rich fen vegetation in lowland England and Wales. J. Appl. Ecol. 25: 331–353

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler BD and Shaw SC (1987) Comparative survey of habitat conditions and management characteristics of herbaceous rich-fen vegetation types. Contract survey report no. 6. Nature Conservancy Council, Peterborough

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler BD and Shaw SC (1992) Biological indicators of the dehydration and changes to East Anglian fens, past and present. English Nature Research Report No. 22. Environmental Consultancy, University of Sheffield

  • Yeo MJM, Blackstock TH and Stevens DP (1998) The use of phytosociological data in conservation assessment: a case study of lowland grasslands in mid Wales. Biol. Cons. 86: 125–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Zar JH (1984) Biostatistical Analysis, 2nd edition, p 71. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Merlewood Research Station, Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Grange-over-Sands, Cumbria, LA11 6LU, UK

    Simon M. Smart

Authors
  1. Simon M. Smart
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Smart, S.M. Ecological assessment of vegetation from a nature reserve using regional reference data and indicator scores. Biodiversity and Conservation 9, 811–832 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008948602316

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008948602316

Search

Navigation