Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Reconfigurable manufacturing systems: Key to future manufacturing

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Presented in this article is a review of manufacturing techniques and introduction of reconfigurable manufacturing systems; a new paradigm in manufacturing which is designed for rapid adjustment of production capacity and functionality, in response to new market conditions. A definition of reconfigurable manufacturing systems is outlined and an overview of available manufacturing techniques, their key drivers and enablers, and their impacts, achievements and limitations is presented. A historical review of manufacturing from the point-of-view of the major developments in the market, technology and sciences issues affecting manufacturing is provided. The new requirements for manufacturing are discussed and characteristics of reconfigurable manufacturing systems and their key role in future manufacturing are explained. The paper is concluded with a brief review of specific technologies and research issues related to RMSs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aronson, R. B. (1997) Operation plug-and-play is on the way. Manufacturing Engineering, 108–112.

  • Ashley, S. (1997) Manufacturing firms face the future. Mechanical Engineering, 70–74.

  • Attaran, M. (1995) Role in CIM success. Industrial Engineering, 27(12), 28–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badiru, A. B. (1992) Expert Systems Applications in Engineering and Manufacturing, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckert, B. (1990) Integrated manufacturing: New wizards of management. Industry Week, 60–84.

  • Bjorkman, T. (1996) The rationalization movement in perspective and some ergonomic implications. Applied Ergonomics, 27(2), 111–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buzacott, J. A. (1995) A perspective on new paradigm in manufacturing. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 4(2), 118–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, I. J., Chung, C. and A. Gupta (1994) The integration of JIT and FMS: Issues and decisions. Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 5(1), 4–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clegg, C. (1988) Appropriate technology for manufacturing: Some management issues. Applied Ergonomics, 19, 25–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elmuti, D. (1996) Sustaining high performance through self-managed work teams. Industrial Management, 4–9.

  • Garro, O. and Martin, P. (1993) Towards new architecture of machine tools. International Journal of Production Research, 31(10), 2403–2414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, S. L., Nagel, R. N. and Preiss, K. (1995) Agile Competitors and Virtual Organizations: Strategies for Enriching the Customer, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, Y. and Lonial, S. C. (1992) Empirical assessment of the strategic orientation of JIT manufacturing verses non-JIT manufacturers. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 15(3), 181–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gyorki, J. R. (1989) How to succeed CIM. Machine Design, 99–105.

  • Heytler, P. and Ulsoy, A.G. (1997) A Survey of Flexible and Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems (RMSs), Internal report, Engineering research center for Reconfigurable machining systems (ERC/RMS), The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horte, S. A. and Lindberg, P. (1991) Implementation of advanced manufacturing technologies: Swedish FMS experiences. International Journal of Human Factors in Manufacturing, 1, 55–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, S. J. (1997) Stream of variation theory for automotive body assembly, Annals of the CIRP, 46(1).

  • Iacocca Inst. Report, Lehigh University, (1991), 21st Century Manufacturing Enterprise Strategy, Bethlehem, PA.

  • Koren, Y. and Ulsoy, A. G. (1997) Reconfigurable manufacturing systems. Engineering Research Center for Reconfigurable Machining Systems (ERC/RMS) Report 1, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koren, Y., Heisel, U., Jovane, F., Moriwoki, T., Pritschow, G., Ulsoy, A. G., and H. Van Brussel, (1999), Reconfigurable manufacturing systems. Annals of the CIRP, vol. 2, pp. 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumara, S. R. T., Kashyap, R. L. and Soysters A. L. (eds.), (1988) Artificial intelligence: manufacturing theory and practice, Industrial engineering and management press, Norcross, GA.

  • Kusiak, A. and He, D. W. 1997, Design for agile assembly: An operational perspective International Journal of Production Research, 35(1), 157–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kusiak, A. (1987), Designing expert systems for scheduling of automated manufacturing. Industrial Engineering, 19(7), 42–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, F., 1995, High Volume Learns to Flex Manufacturing Engineering, 53–59.

  • McDermott, D. and Brown, W. A. (1996) The Ultimate 21st century market differentiator, Industrial Management, 3–7.

  • Mehrabi, M. G. and Ulsoy, A. G. (1997a), State-of-the-art in Reconfigurable manufacturing systems. Report 2, Vol. I, Engineering Research Center for Reconfigurable machining systems (ERC/RMS), The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehrabi, M. G. and Ulsoy A. G. (eds.), (1997b), State-of-the-art in technologies related to reconfigurable manufacturing systems, Report #2, Vol. II, Engineering Research Center for Reconfigurable machining systems (ERC/RMS), The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mondon, Y. (1981a), Adaptable Kanban system helps Toyota maintain just-in-time production. Industrial Engineering, 13(5), 28–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mondon, Y. (1981b), What makes the toyota production system really ticks? Industrial Engineering, 13(1), 34–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (NRC) (1998) Visionary manufacturing challenges for 2020, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Next Generation Manufacturing (NGM) Project, 1997, Next-Generation Manufacturing: A Framework for Action, Agility Forum, Leaders for Manufacturing, and Technologies Enabling Agile Manufacturing, Bethlehem, PA.

  • Noaker, P. M. (1994) The search for agile manufacturing. Manufacturing Engineering, 13, 40–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, G. G. and Bottaci, L. (1997) Modular production systems: A new manufacturing paradigm. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 8, 147–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakakibara, S., Flynn, B. B., and Schreder, R. G. (1995) A frame work and measurement instrument for JIT manufacturing. Production and Operations Management, 2(3), 177–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schonberger, R. J. (1983) Plant layout becomes product-oriented with cellular, JIT production concepts. Industrial Engineering, 15(11), 66–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seppala, P., Tuominen, E. and Koskinen, P. (1992) Impact of flexible production philosophy and advanced manufacturing technology on organizations and jobs. The International Journal of Human Factors in Engineering, 2(2), 177–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheridan, J. H. (1989) Towards the CIM solution. Industry Week, 35–80.

  • Sheridan, J. H. (1993) Agile manufacturing: step beyond lean manufacturing. Industry Week, 30–46.

  • Teresko, J. (1990), EDM: The next step toward CIM. Industry Week, 55–57.

  • The Association for Manufacturing Technology (AMT) Report (1996). A Technology Road Map for the Machine-Tool Industry.

  • Wright, P. K. (1995) Principle of open-architecture manufacturing. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 14(3), 187–202.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical Engineering and Applied Mechanics, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-2125, USA

    M. G. Mehrabi

  2. Department of Mechanical Engineering and Applied Mechanics, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-2125, USA

    A. G. Ulsoy

  3. Department of Mechanical Engineering and Applied Mechanics, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-2125, USA

    Y. Koren

Authors
  1. M. G. Mehrabi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. G. Ulsoy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Y. Koren
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mehrabi, M.G., Ulsoy, A.G. & Koren, Y. Reconfigurable manufacturing systems: Key to future manufacturing. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 11, 403–419 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008930403506

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008930403506

Search

Navigation