Skip to main content
Log in

Abstract

Technological literacy has been given official sanction; it is the end of technology education in the United States. For most technology educators, the construct is neutral, and something nobody could be ‘against’. This article situates technological literacy in its ideological context of competitive supremacy and conservative politics. In opposition to a ‘neutral’ notion of this construct, a turn toward critical technological literacy is negotiated. Critical technological literacy represents an overtly political turn toward overcoming forms of power that sustain inequities in the built world. To engage in these politics, it is argued that technology educators will necessarily have to resituate their practice within cultural studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Aptheker, H.: 1989, Literary Legacy of W.E.B. Dubois, Kraus International Publications, White Plains, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, M.: 1995, ‘Literacy, Technology and Technological Literacy’, International Journal of Technology and Design Education 5(2), 119-137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, P. & Harrison, G.: 1993, ‘Technological Capability’, in R. McCormick, P. Murphy & M. Harrison (eds.), Teaching and Learning Technology, Addison-Wesley, New York, 51-57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blacker, D.: 1994, ‘On the Alleged Neutrality of Technology: A Study in Dewey’s Experience and Nature, The Journal of Speculative Philosophy 8(4), 297-317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonser, F. G.: 1928a, ‘The Most Outstanding Next Steps for Curriculum Makers in the United States: A Response by Frederick Gordon Bonser’, Teachers College Record 30(3), 200-204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonser, F. G.: 1932, ‘The Industrial Arts in an Efficient Education’, in F. G. Bonser (ed.), Life Needs and Education, Teachers College Press, New York, 95-106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brameld, T.: 1941, ‘Toward a Philosophy of Workers’ Education’, in T. Brameld (ed.), Workers’ Education in the United States, Harper & Brothers, New York, 278-302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braundy, M.: 1997, Orientation to Trades and Technology: A Curriculum and Resource Book With Special Emphasis on the Needs of Women, Open Learning Agency, Burnaby BC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryson, M. & de Castell, S.: 1998, ‘Telling Tales Out of School: Modernist, Critical, and Postmodern ‘True Stoires’ About Educational Computing’, in H. Bromley & M. Apple (eds.), Education/Technology/Power: Educational Computing as Social Practice, State University of New York Press, Albany, NY, 65-84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burbles, N. & Calister, T.: 1996, ‘Knowledge at the Crossroads: Some Alternative Futures of Hypertext Learning Environments’, Educational Theory 46, 23-34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colelli, L.: 1994, Tech Prep and Technology Education: A Positive Focus for Competitive Literacy, ITEA, Reston, VA.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Castell, S.: 1998, ‘From Data Information to Learning and Understanding’, http://www.educ.sfu.ca/gentech/libweb.htm.

  • Department For Education: 1987, Design and Technological Activity, Her Majesty’s Printing Office, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeVore, P.: 1986, ‘Measuring Technological Literacy: Problems and Issues’, Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society 6(2 & 3), 202-209.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeVore, P.: 1992, ‘Technological Literacy and Social Purpose’, Theory Into Practice 31(1), 59-63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J.: 15 May 1915, ‘Education vs. Trade-Training-Dr. Dewey’s Reply’, The New Republic 3(28), 42-43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J.: 1917, ‘Learning to Earn’, School and Society 5(4), 331-335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J.: 1922, ‘Education as Politics’, New Republic 32, 139-141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. & Dewey, E.: 1915/1962, Schools of Tomorrow, E.P. Dutton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • DuBois, W. E. B.: 1932, ‘Education and Work’, Journal of Negro Education 1(1), 60-74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DuBois, W. E. B.: 1933/1986, ‘The Right to Work’, in N. Higgins (ed.), W. E. B. DuBois: Writings, Library of America, New York, 1235-1238.

    Google Scholar 

  • DuBois, W. E. B.: 1936/1985, ‘The Negro and Social Reconstruction’, in H. Aptheker (ed.), Against Racism: Unpublished Essays, Papers, Addresses, 1887-1961, University of Massachusets Press, Amherst, MA, 145-160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dugger, W.: 1995, ‘Technology for all Americans’, The Technology Teacher 54(5), 3-6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyrenfurth, M.: 1983, ‘The Route to Technological Literacy’, VocEd 58(1), 42-44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyrenfurth, M.: 1991, ‘Technological Literacy Synthesized’, in M. Dyrenfurth and M. Kozak (eds.), Technological Literacy, 40th Yearbook of the Council for Technology Teacher Education, Glencoe, Peoria, IL, 138-183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Education Commission of the States: 1983, A Summary of Major Reports on Education, Author, Denver, CO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng, F. & Petrina, S.: 1998, What do We do With the Waste?: Towards Natural Cultural Studies. Unpublished manuscript.

  • Fleming, R.: 1989, ‘Literacy for a Technological Age’, Science Education 73(4), 391-404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster, P.: 1995, ‘Industrial Arts/Technology Education as a Social Study: The Original Intent?’, Journal of Technology Education 6(2), 4-18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, W. T.: 1996, ‘A Research Agenda for Technology Education’, The Technology Teacher 56(1), 31-33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P.: 1970, Pedagogy of the Oppressed, trans. by M.B. Ramos, Continuum, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagel, C.: 1997, ‘Literacy and Technology: Reflections and Insights for Technological Literacy’, Journal of Industrial Teacher Education 34(3), 6-34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. P.: 1990, Social Linguistics and Literacies: Ideology in Discourses, Falmer, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. P., Hull, G. & Lankshear, C.: 1996, The New Work Order: Behind the Language of the New Capitalism, Westview, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilberti, A.: 1989, Technological Literacy as a Curriculum Movement in Education. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, S. & Cutcliffe, S.: 1982, ‘STS, Technology Literacy, and the Arts Curriculum’, Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society 2(3), 291-305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gowen, S. G.: 1992, The Politics of Workplace Literacy, Teachers College Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gowan, S. G.: 1994, ‘The “Literacy Myth” at Work’, in R. Lakes (ed.), Critical Education for Work, Ablex Publishing Corporation, Norwood, NJ, 35-49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, M.: 1991, ‘The Literacy Debate and the Public School: Going Beyond the Functional’, Educational Horizons 60(3), 129-168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregson, J.: 1993, ‘Critical Pedagogy for Vocational Education’, Journal of Industrial Education 30(2), 3-19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossberg, L.: 1994, ‘Introduction: Bringin’ it All Back Home-Pedagogy and Cultural Studies’, in H. Giroux & P. McLaren (eds.), Betrween Borders: Pedagogy and the Politics of Cultural Studies, Routledge, New York, 1-28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, S. (ed.): 1997, Representation: Cultural Rand Signifying Practices, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, R. & Froelich, M.: 1994, ‘Technological Literacy’, Canadian Vocational Journal 30(1), 13-19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D.: 1985, ‘Manifesto for Cyborgs: Science, Technology and Socialist Feminism in the 1980s’, Socialist Review 80, 65-108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D.: 1995, ‘Cyborgs and Symbionts’, in C. H. Gray (ed.), The Cyborg Handbook, Routledge, New York, xi-xix.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoepfl, M.: 1993, ‘Technological Literacy Viewed from Without’, Paper presented at the Convention of the International Technology Education Association, Charlotte, NC.

  • Hooks, B.: 1994, Teaching to Transgress: Education as the Practice of Freedom, Routledge, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, G. (ed.): 1997, Changing Work, Changing Workers: Critical Perspectives on Language, Literacy and Skills, State University of New York Press, Albany, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Technology Education Association: 1996, Technology for All Americans, Author, Reston, VA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, E.: 1997a, ‘Technological Literacy: Concepts and Constructs’, Journal of Technology Studies 23(1), 2-5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, E.: 1997b, ‘Scientific and Technological Literacy: Meanings and Rationales’, in E. Jenkins (ed.), Innovations in Science and Technology Education, vol. VI, UNESCO, Paris, 11-39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, K.: 1996, ‘Some Thoughts on African Americans’ Struggle to Participate in Technology Education’, Journal of Technology Studies 22(1), 49-54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellner, D.: 1998, ‘Multiple Literacies and Critical Pedagogy in a Multicultural Society’, Educational Theory 48, 103-122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakes, R. (ed.): 1994, Critical Education for Work: Multidisciplinary Approaches, Ablex, Norwood, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lankshear, C.: 1997, Changing Literacies, Open University Press, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lankshear, C. & Lawler, M.: 1987, Literacy, Schooling and Revolution, Falmer, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lankshear, C. & McLaren, P. (eds.): 1993, Critical Literacy, State University of New York Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B.: 1991, ‘Technology is Society Made Durable’, in. J. Law (ed.), A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination, Routledge, New York, 103-131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, T.: 1996, ‘Accommodating Border Crossings’, Journal of Industrial Teacher Education 33(2), 7-27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, T.: 1997, ‘America’s Choice: Literacy or Productivity’, Curriculum Inquiry 27(4), 391-422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, T. & Gagel, C.: 1992, ‘Technological Literacy: A Critical Analysis’, Journal of Curriculum Studies 24(2), 117-138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liddament, T.: 1993, ‘Technological Capability: A Problematic Concept’, Design Studies 14(3), 330-343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liddament, T.: 1994, ‘Technological Literacy: The Construction of Meaning’, Design Studies 15(2), 189-213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macedo, D.: 1994, Literacies of Power: What Americans are Not Allowed to Know, Westview, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackay, H.: 1992, ‘From Computer literacy to Technology Literacy’, in J. Beynon & H. Mackay (eds.), Technological Literacy and the Curriculum, Falmer, New York, 125-147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Media Foundation: 1999, ‘Information: The Media Foundation’, http://www.adbusters.org/information/foundatio n.html.

  • McLaren, P.: 1995, Critical Pedagogy and Predatory Culture, Routledge, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaren, P., Hammer, R., Sholle, D. & Reilly, S.: 1997, Rethinking Media Literacy, Peter Lang, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, C.: 1995, ‘Developing Environmental Literacy’, The Technology Teacher 54(3), 30-34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, C. & Weiler, K.: 1991, Rewriting Literacy: Culture and Discourse of the Other, Bergin & Garvey, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, W.: 1997, Critical Literacy in the Classroom, Routledge, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadin, M.: 1997, The Civilization of Illiteracy, Dresden University Press, Dresden, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Commission on Excellence in Education: 1991, A Nation at Risk: The Imperative for Educational Reform, US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Education Goals Panel: 1991, The National Education Goals Report., US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noble, D.: 1984a, ‘Computer Literacy and Ideology’, Teachers College Record 85(4), 602-614.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noble, D.: 1984b, ‘The Underside of Computer Literacy’, Raritan 3(4), 37-64.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Riley, P.: 1996, ‘A Different Storytelling of Technology Education Curriculum Revisions’, Journal of Technology Education 7(2), 28-40.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Riley, P.: 1999, Opening up Technology Discourses to Difference (Ph.D. diss., The Ohio State University).

  • Orr, D. W.: 1992, Ecological Literacy, State University of New York Press, Albany, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, M. & Lankshear, C.: 1996, ‘Critical Literacy and Digital Texts’, Educational Theory 46, 51-70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrina, S.: 1993, ‘Under the Corporate Thumb: Troubles with Our MATE (Modular Approach to Technology Education’, Journal of Technology Education 5(1), 72-80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrina, S.: 1995, ‘The End of Technology Eucation: A Response to Theodore Lewis and Karen Zuga’, Journal of Industrial Teacher Education 32(3), 75-82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrina, S.: 1998a, ‘Multidisciplinary Technology Education’, International Journal of Technology and Design Education 8(2), 103-138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrina, S.: 1998b, ‘Men at Work: Inspecting the Foundations of Technology Education’, Journal of Technology Education 36(1), 99-121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrina, S.: 1999, A Theory of Practice in Multidisciplinary Technology Education, Unpublished manuscript.

  • Petrina, S., Hill, A. M. & Lewis, T.: under review, ‘The Political Ecology of Design and Technology Education: Toward Sustainable Practice’, International Journal of Technology and Design Education.

  • Petrina, S. & Volk, K.: 1995b, ‘Industrial Arts Movement’s History, Vision and Ideal: Relevant, Contemporary, Used but Unrecognized (part I)’, Journal of Technology Studies 21(1), 24-32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrina, S. & Volk, K.: 1995c, ‘Industrial Arts Movement’s History, Vision and Ideal: Relevant, Contemporary, Used but Unrecognized (part II)’, Journal of Technology Studies 21(2), 28-35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prime, G.: 1998, ‘Tailoring Assessment of Technological Literacy Learning’, Journal of Technology Studies 24(1), 18-23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pucel, D.: 1989, ‘Technological Literacy: A Goal and Role for Secondary Industrial Education’, Journal of technology and Society 2(2), 33-46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pucel, D.: 1995, ‘Developing Technological Literacy’, The Technology Teacher 55(3), 35-43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, R.: 1982, ‘STS: Core of Technological Literacy’, Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society 2(3), 289-290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shamos, M.: 1995, The Myth of Scientific Literacy, Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shea, C., Kahane, E. & Sola, P. (eds.): 1989, The New Servants of Power: A Critique of the 1980s School Reform Movement., Greenwood, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shor, I.: 1988, ‘Working Hands and Critical Minds: A Paulo Freire Model for Job Training’, Journal of Education 170(2), 102-121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shor, I.: 1992, Culture Wars: School and Society in the Conservative Restoration, 1969-1984, Routledge & Kegan Paul, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, R., Dippo, D. & Schenke, A.: 1991, Learning Work: A Critical Pedagogy of Work Education, Bergen & Garvey, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Street, B.: 1984, Literacy in Theory and Practice, Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Technology Education Advisory Council: 1988, Technology: A National Imperative, International Technology Education Association, Reston, VA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todd, R.: 1991, ‘The Natures and Challenges of Technological Literacy’, in M. Dyrenfurth and M. Kozak (eds.), Technological Literacy, 40th Yearbook of the Council for Technology Teacher Education, Glencoe, Peoria, IL, 10-27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuman, M.: 1987, A Preface to Literacy, University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa, AL.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. House of Representatives: 1986, ‘Technology Education Act of 1986’, 99th Congress, second session, 1986, H. Doc 343-24.

  • Waetjen, W.: 1987, ‘The Autonomy of Technology: A Challenge to Education’, The Technology Teacher 46(6), 7-14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waetjen, W.: 1988, ‘Forward’, in Technology Education Advisory Council, Technology: A National Imperative, ITEA, Reston, VA, n.p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waetjen, W.: 1993, ‘Technological Literacy Reconsidered’, Journal of Technology Education 4(2), 5-11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waks, L.: 1986, ‘Reflections on Technological Literacy’, Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society 6(2 & 3), 331-336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westbury, I. & Purves, A. (eds.): 1988, Cultural Literacy and the Idea of General Education, 87th yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, part II, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willinsky, J.: 1990, The New Literacy, Routledge, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willinsky, J.: 1991, ‘Postmodern Literacy: A Primer’, Interchange 22(4), 50-76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wirth, A.: 1989, ‘Toward a Post-Industrial Intelligence and Democratic Renewal’, Journal of Industrial Teacher Education 27(1), 5-21.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Petrina, S. The Politics of Technological Literacy. International Journal of Technology and Design Education 10, 181–206 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008919120846

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008919120846

Navigation